Quantitative risk assessment of the Italian gas distribution network

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-17

  Vianello, Chiara ^a   Maschio, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hazmat; Land use planning; Natural gas; Risk analysis; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES; GASES; LAND USE; NATURAL GAS; PUBLIC WORKS; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

GAS DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; HAZMAT; HIGH PRESSURE NATURAL GAS; INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS; LAND USE PLANNING; OPERATING PRESSURE; PHYSICAL RESOURCES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; LAND-USE PLANNING;

RISK ASSESSMENT; NATURAL GAS;

EID: 84906059704     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. API API 581 risk based inspection technology 2008.
2. Boot H. The use of risk criteria in comparing transportation alternatives. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2013, 31:199-204.
3. Borysiewicz M., Potempski S. Methods of hazard identification and prioritisation of risk for people resulting due to major transportation accidents 2001, Raport IAE-77/A. Świerk, Poland.
4. Brito a, Dealmeida a Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliability Engineering System Safety 2009, 94(2):187-198. 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.014.
5. Bubbico R., Maschio G., Mazzarotta B., Milazzo M.F., Parisi E. Risk management of road and rail transport of hazardous materials in Sicily. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19(1):32-38. Retrieved from. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423005000574.
6. Center for Chemical Process Safety Guidelines for chemical transportation risk analysis 1995, (Center for Chemical Process Safety "Guidelines" series), Wiley-AIChE, Retrieved from. http://www.amazon.com/Guidelines-Chemical-Transportation-Analysis-Process/dp/0816906262.
7. CONCAWE Oil pipelines Management Group's Special Task Force on oil pipeline spillages (OP/STF-1) 2011, Brussels.
8. DIRECTIVE 2012/18/EU. (n.d.).
9. Dziubinski M., Fratczak M., Markowski A.S. Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19(5):399-408. 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.10.007.
10. Egidi D., Foraboschi F.P., Spadoni G., Amendola A. The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1995, 49(1):75-89. 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00026-X.
11. EGIG Gas pipeline incident 2011.
12. Erkut E., Alp O. Integrated routing and scheduling of hazmat trucks with stops en route. Transportation Science 2007, 41(1):107-122. 10.1287/trsc.1060.0176.
13. Fabiano B., Currò F., Palazzi E., Pastorino R. Aframework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2002, 93(1):1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00034-1.
14. Han Z.Y., Weng W.G. An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(3):428-436. 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003.
15. Health and Safety Executive Major hazard aspects of the transport of dangerous substances 1991, HSE Books, Retrieved from. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hazard-Aspects-Transport-Dangerous-Substances/dp/0118856995.
16. Hill R.T., Catmur J.R. Risks from hazardous pipelines in the United Kingdom 1994, Health and Safety Executive Contract Research Report No. 82, Retrieved March 04, 2014, from. http://workboostwales.net/research/crr_pdf/1994/crr94082.pdf.
17. HInt Dossier Gas pipeline explosion at Ghislenghien, Belgium 2005.
18. HSE & Contract Research Report 210 Assessing the risk from gasoline pipelines in the United Kingdom based on a review of historical experience 1999.
19. http://www.asme.org. (n.d.).
20. INTeg-Risk Course VD-R35 TRA - Transportation risk assessment 2012.
21. Jo Y.-D., Ahn B.J. Amethod of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2005, 123(1-3):1-12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.034.
22. Jo Y., Crowl D. Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2008, 21(6):589-595. 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.006.
23. Kara B.Y., Verter V. Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Science 2004, 38(2):188-196. 10.1287/trsc.1030.0065.
24. Landucci G., Tugnoli A., Busini V., Derudi M., Rota R., Cozzani V. The viareggio LPG accident: lessons learnt. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24(4):466-476. 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.001.
25. Markowski A.S. Loss prevention in industry, Part III-Management of process safety 2000, Technical University of Lodz.
26. Mathurkar H.N., Gupta A. A.Cross-country pipeline safety assessment 2006, India.
27. Medina H., Arnaldos J., Casal J., Bonvicini S., Cozzani V. Risk-based optimization of the design of on-shore pipeline shutdown systems. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012, 25(3):489-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.005.
28. Metropolo P.L., Brown A.E. Natural gas pipeline accident consequence analysis. Process Safety Progress 2004, 23:307-310. Retrieved from. http://journals.ohiolink.edu/ejc/article.cgi?issn=10668527%26issue=v23i0004%26article=307_ngpaca.
29. Milazzo M.F., Lisi R., Maschio G., Antonioni G., Spadoni G. Astudy of land transport of dangerous substances in Eastern Sicily. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(3):393-403. Retrieved from. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423010000197.
30. Ministero dello sviluppo economico DECRETO 17 aprile 2008 2008, Retrieved from. http://gazzette.comune.jesi.an.it/2008/145/2.htm.
31. Montiel H., Vílchez J.A., Arnaldos J., Casal J. Historical analysis of accidents in the transportation of natural gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1996, 51(1-3):77-92. 10.1016/S0304-3894(96)01819-5.
32. Muhlbauer W.K. Pipeline risk management manual 1996, 438. Gulf Professional Publishing, Retrieved from. http://www.amazon.com/Pipeline-Management-Manual-Second-Edition/dp/0884156680, 2nd ed.
33. OGP Risk assessment data directory 2010, Report No. 434-7.
34. Saeid Mokhatab, Poe W.A., Speight J.G. Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing 2006, Gulf Professional Publication, ISBN: 978-0-7506-7776-9.
35. Schork J.M., Lutostansky E.M., Auvil S.R. Societal risk criteria and pipelines. Pipeline and Gas Journal 2012, Retrieved March 04, 2014, from. http://www.pipelineandgasjournal.com/societal-risk-criteria-and-pipelines.
36. Sklavounos S., Rigas F. Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19(1):24-31. 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.002.
37. Slater D.H., Cox R.A., Comer P.J., Pyman M. Safety issues in the siting of LNG terminals. Gastech '79 LNG/LPG Conf. Pap.; (United States) 1979, 4(1). Retrieved from. http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6215157.
38. TNO Purple book - Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment 1999, (CPR18E, Ed.). CPR18E.
39. Vianello C., Maschio G. Risk analysis of natural gas pipeline: case study of a generic pipeline. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2011, 24:1309-1314. Retrieved from. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955489903%26partnerID=40%26md5=41b601333906f79591e0379ef7461808.
40. Yuhua D., Datao Y. Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2005, 18(2):83-88. 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.12.003.
41. Lac Megantic, Canada 2014:. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/railway-behind-lac-megantic-derailment-was-cited-for-brake-violations/article16848316/.
42. National Transport Safety Board,. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/reports.html.