An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 428-436

  Han, Z Y ^a   Weng, W G ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Natural gas pipeline; Quantitative evaluation; Risk analysis; Safety management

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC LOSS; GAS PIPELINE NETWORKS; INDIVIDUAL RISKS; PROBABILITY ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; RE-DISTRIBUTION; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SAFETY PERFORMANCE; SOCIETAL RISKS; URBAN SAFETY;

ACCIDENTS; GAS INDUSTRY; GAS PIPELINES; GAS SUPPLY; GASES; NATURAL GAS PIPELINES; NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION; PIPELINES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 77950950432     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albert R., Jeong H., and Barabási A.L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406 (2000) 378-382
2. Alonso F.D., Ferradas E.G., and Pérez J.F.S. Characteristic overpressure-impulse-distance curves for vapour cloud explosions using the TNO multi-energy model. Journal of Hazardous Materials A137 (2006) 734-741
3. Alonso F.D., Ferradaś E.G., and Miñarro M.D. Consequence analysis by means of characteristic curves to determine the damage to buildings from the detonation of explosive substances as a function of TNT equivalence. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 21 (2008) 74-81
4. Alonso F.D., Ferradas E.G., and Pérez J.F.S. Consequence analysis to determine damage to buildings from vapour cloud explosions using characteristic curves. Journal of Hazardous Materials 159 (2008) 264-270
5. Arnaldos J., Casal J., Montiel H., Sanchez-Carricondo M., and Vilchez J.A. Design of a computer tool for the evaluation of the consequences of accidental natural gas releases in distribution pipes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 11 2 (1998) 135-148
6. Api RP 521. Recommended practice 521. 3rd ed. (1990), API, Washington, DC
7. Api RP 581. Recommended practice 581. Risk based resource document (2000), API, Washington, DC
8. Cagno E., Caron F., Mancini M., and Ruggeri F. Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 67 (2000) 275-284
9. CCPS. Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of vapor cloud explosions, flash fires and BLEVEs (1994), AIChE, New York
10. CPQRA. Guideline for chemical process quantitative risk analysis (1988), The Center for Chemical Process Safety of American Institute of Chemical Engineers. 0-8169-0402-2
11. Cui H., Xu Z.S., and Song W.H. Quantitative comparative analysis on explosion and poisoning accidents of artificial gas. Journal of Catastrophe 23 (2008) 96-100 (In Chinese)
12. EGIG. (1999). European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group. Gas Pipeline Incidents, fourth Report 1970-1998.
13. Ferradaś E.G., Alonso F.D., and Miñarro M.D. Consequence analysis by means of characteristic curves to determine the damage to buildings from bursting spherical vessels. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 86 (2008) 175-181
14. Han Z.Y., and Weng W.G. An overview of quantitative risk analysis methods for natural gas pipelines. Journal of China Safety Science Journal 19 (2009) 154-164 (in Chinese)
15. Huang C., Weng W.G., and Wu J.H. Failure propagation model for city gas pipeline network. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology) 48 (2008) 1283-1286 (in Chinese)
16. IGE. Steel pipeline for high pressure gas transmission. Recommendations on transmission and distribution practice IGE/TD/1. 4th ed. (2001), The Institution of Gas Engineers, London, UK (Communication 1670)
17. Jo Y.D., and Ahn B.J. Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15 3 (2002) 179-188
18. Jo Y.D., and Ahn B.J. A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials A123 (2005) 1-12
19. Jo Y.D., and Ahn B.J. A simple model for the release rate of hazardous gas from a hole on high-pressure pipelines. Journal of Hazardous Materials A97 (2003) 31-46
20. Jo Y.D., and Crowl D.A. Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 21 (2008) 589-595
21. Jonkman S.N., van Gelder P.H., and Vrijling J.K. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials 99 (2003) 1-30
22. Krueger J., and Smith D. A practical approach to fire hazard analysis for offshore structures. Journal of Hazardous Materials 104 (2003) 107-122
23. Li C.M. Design basis of gas network hydraulic calculation procedure (1997), China Coal Industry Publishing House (in Chinese)
24. Luo J.H., Zheng M., Zhao X.W., Huo C.Y., and Yang L. Simplified expression for estimating release rate of hazardous gas from a hole on high-pressure pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 362-366
25. Mazzoldi A., Hill T., and Colls J.J. CFD and Gaussian atmospheric dispersion models: a comparison for leak from carbon dioxide transportation and storage facilities. Journal of Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008) 8046-8054
26. Metropolo, P. L., & Brown, A. E. P. (2004). Natural gas pipeline accident consequence analysis. In 3rd international conference on computer simulation in risk Analysis & hazard mitigation, Sintra, Portugal (pp. 307-310).
27. Montiel H., Vilchez J.A., and Amaldos J. Historical analysis of accidents in the transportation of natural gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials 51 (1996) 77-92
28. Montiel H., Vi{dotless}lchez J.A., and Casal J. Mathematical modeling of accidental gas releases. Journal of Hazardous Materials 59 (1998) 211-233
29. Rausch A.H., Eisenberg N.A., and Lynch C.J. Continuing development of the vulnerability model (VM2) (1977), Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC
30. Sklavounos S., and Rigas F. Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (2006) 24-31
31. Suardin J.A., McPhate A.J., and Sipkema A. Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): an effective screening and comparison tool. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 87 (2009) 147-160
32. TNO Purple Book. Guideline for quantitative risk assessment (1999), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Netherlands
33. Vrouwenvelder A.C., Lovegrove R., and Holicky M. Risk assessment and risk communication in civil engineering. Safety, Risk and Reliability-Trends in Engineering (2001) 1-6 Malta
34. Yang Z., Li X.H., and Lai J.B. Analysis on the diffusion hazards of dynamic leakage of gas pipeline. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 (2007) 47-53
35. Yu D.M., and Feng C.G. The damage of explosions and the division of their injury regions. Journal of China Safety Science 5 (1995) 13-17 (in Chinese)