Development of the PROMIS® health expectancies of smoking item banks

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL.3, 2014, Pages

  Edelen, Maria Orlando ^a   Tucker, Joan S ^a   Shadel, William G ^a   Stucky, Brian D ^a   Cerully, Jennifer ^a   Li, Zhen ^b   Hansen, Mark ^b   Cai, Li ^b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH; HEALTH EXPECTANCY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RACE DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; ADOLESCENT; CALIBRATION; ETHNIC GROUP; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIBRATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SMOKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906046883     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu053     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-815614-X
2. Bize, R., Burnand, B., Mueller, Y., Rège-Walther, M., Camain, J. Y., & Cornuz, J. (2012). Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD004705. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004705.pub4
3. Brandon, T. H., & Baker, T. B. (1991). The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment, 3, 484-491.
4. Brandon, T. H., Herzog, T. A., Irvin, J. E., & Gwaltney, C. J. (2004). Cognitive and social learning models of drug dependence: Implications for the assessment of tobacco dependence in adolescents. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 99(Suppl. 1), 51-77. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00737.x
5. Brewer, N., Chapman, G., Gibbons, F., Gerard, M., McCaul, K., & Weinstein, N. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136-145. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
6. Brown, R. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti (Eds.), The tobacco dependence treatment handbook (pp. 178-229). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Cai, L. (2010). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75, 33-57. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9136-x
9. Cai, L., du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
10. Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized fullinformation item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221-248. doi:10.1037/a0023350
11. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Rose, M. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11. doi:10.1097/01. mlr.0000258615.42478.55
12. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289. doi:10.2307/1165285
13. Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 644-645. doi:10.1177/0146621608329892
14. Copeland, A. L., Brandon, T. H., & Quinn, E. P. (1995). The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment, 7, 484-494. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.484
15. DeWalt, D., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12-S21. doi:10.1097/01/ mlr.0000254567.79743.e2
16. Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl. 1), 5-18. Retrieved from http://rd.springer.com/ journal/11136
17. Edelen, M. O., Stucky, B. D., Hansen, M., Tucker, J. S., Shadel, W. G., & Cai, L. (2014) The PROMIS® smoking initiative: initial validity evidence for six new smoking item banks. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16, S249-S259.
18. Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the mini-mental status examination. Medical Care, 44(Suppl. 3), S134-S142. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245251.83359.8c
19. Edelen, M. O., Tucker, J. S., Shadel, W. G., Stucky, B. D., & Cai, L. (2012). Toward a more systematic assessment of smoking: Development of a smoking module for PROMIS. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 1278-1284. doi:10.1016/j. addbeh.2012.06.016
20. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. (1992). Full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423-436. doi:10.1007/ BF02295430
22. ® smoking item banks. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 16, S174-S188.
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
24. McKee, S. A., O'Malley, S. S., Salovey, P., Krishnan-Sarin, S., & Mazure, C. M. (2005). Perceived risks and benefits of smoking cessation: Gender-specific predictors of motivation and treatment outcome. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 423-435. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.027
25. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
26. Orlando, M., & Marshall, G. (2002). Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD Checklist: Detection and evaluation of impact. Psychological Assessment, 14, 50-59. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.50
27. Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Cella, D. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life items banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl. 1), S22-S31. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04
28. Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
29. Rohsenow, D., Abrams, D., Monti, P., Colby, S., Martin, R., & Niaura, R. (2003). The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations. Development and psychometric properties. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1257-1270. doi:10.1016/ S0306-4603(02)00254-X
30. Romer, D. & Jamieson, P. (2001). The role of perceived risk in starting and stopping smoking. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 64-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Schlam, T. R., & Baker, T. B. (2013). Interventions for tobacco smoking. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 675-702. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185602
32. Stead, L. F., Buitrago, D., Preciado, N., Sanchez, G., Hartmann-Boyce, J., & Lancaster, T. (2013). Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5. Art. No.: CD000165. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000165.pub4
33. Strasser, A., Tang, K., Romer, D., Jepson, C., & Cappella, J. (2012). Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: Recall and viewing patterns. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 41-47. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026
34. Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., & Edelen, M. O. (2013). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 41-57. doi:10.1177/0146621612462759
35. Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 141-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2004) The health consequences of smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_ statistics/sgr/2004/index.htm
37. Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 12, 324-333. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.4.324
38. Weinstein, N. D. (2001). Smokers' recognition of their own vulnerability to harm. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 81-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591-615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506