Uterine-sparing minimally invasive interventions in women with uterine fibroids: A systematic review and indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 858-867

  Panagiotopoulou, Nikoletta ^a   Nethra, Shankaralingaiah ^b   Karavolos, Stamatios ^c   Ahmad, Gaity ^b   Karabis, Andreas ^d   Burls, Amanda ^e  

^a Leigh Infirmary   (United Kingdom)

^b PENNINE ACUTE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

^d MAPI GROUP   (Netherlands)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

fibroids; indirect treatment comparison; myomectomy; uterine artery embolization; uterine artery occlusion; Uterine sparing surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC UTERINE ARTERY OCCLUSION; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MYOMECTOMY; OVARY INSUFFICIENCY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERUS MYOMA;

FIBROIDS; INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON; MYOMECTOMY; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERINE ARTERY OCCLUSION; UTERINE SPARING SURGERY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LEIOMYOMA; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERINE MYOMECTOMY; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 84905970824     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12441     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Gentry CC, Okolo SO, Fong LF, Crow JC, Maclean AB, Perrett CW,. Quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor-A in leiomyomas and adjacent myometrium. Clin Sci (Lond). 2001; 101: 691-5.
2. Flynn M, Jamison M, Datta S, Myers E,. Health care resource use for uterine fibroid tumors in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 955-64.
3. Lee DW, Gibson TB, Carls GS, Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S, Steward EA,. Uterine fibroid treatment patterns in a population of insured women. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 566-74.
4. Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, Stuart G, Rankins N, Thieda P, et al. Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2007; 154: 1-122.
5. Nieman LK, Blocker W, Nansel T, Mahoney S, Reynolds J, Blithe D, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of CDB-2914 treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 767e1-72.
6. Tristan M, Orozco LJ, Steed A, Ramírez-Morera A, Stone P,. Mifepristone for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 8: CD007687.
7. York. Results of fibroid network survey. In: FEMME study group. A randomized trial of treating fibroids with either embolization or myomectomy to measure the effect on quality of life, among women wishing to avoid hysterectomy: the FEMME study. Available online at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/ projects/hta/085322 (accessed January 2, 2014).
8. Poettgen H,. [Clinical contribution to female identity crisis after loss of the uterus] (in German.) Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1993; 43: 428-31.
9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Heavy menstrual bleeding. Clinical Guideline CG044. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007. Available online at: http://www.nice.org.uk/ nicemedia/live/11002/30404/30404.pdf (accessed January 2, 2014).
10. Istre O,. Management of symptomatic fibroids: conservative surgical treatment modalities other than abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 22: 735-47.
11. Goldfard HA,. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995; 22: 807-19.
12. Odnusi KO, Rutherford TJ, Olive DL, Bia F, Parkash V, Brown J, et al. Cryomyolysis in the management of uterine fibroids: technique and complications. Surg Technol Int. 1999; 8: 173-8.
13. LeBlang SD, Hoctor K, Steinberg FL,. Leiomyoma shrinkage after MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment: report of 80 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 274-80.
14. Gurtcheff SE, Sharp HT,. Complications associated with global endometrial ablation: the utility of the MAUDE Database. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 1278-82.
15. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, Vilos G, Common A, Zaidi M, et al.; Ontario UFE Collaborative Group. Tolerance, hospital stay, and recovery after uterine artery embolization for fibroids: the Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14: 1243-50.
16. Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M,. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5: CD005073.
17. Higgins JPT, Green S, (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available online at: www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed January 2, 2014).
18. Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP,. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ. 2005; 331: 897-900.
19. Lu G, Ades AE,. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004; 23: 3105-24.
20. Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, Stam W,. Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons. Value Health. 2008; 11: 956-64.
21. Dempster AP,. The direct use of likelihood for significance testing. Stat Comput. 1997; 7: 247-52.
22. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Ades AE,. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A generalised linear modelling framework for pair-wise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Available online at: http://www.nicedsu.org.uk/ (accessed October 9, 2012).
23. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A,. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2002; 64: 583-639.
24. Ambat S, Mittal S, Srivastava DN, Misra R, Dadhwal V, Ghosh B,. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for management of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 105: 162-5.
25. Hald K, Noreng HJ, Istre O, Kløw NE,. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine arteries for leiomyomas: long-term results of a randomized comparative trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20: 1303-10.
26. Hald K, Kløw NE, Qvigstad E, Istre O,. Laparoscopic occlusion compared with embolization of uterine vessels: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 20-7.
27. Helal A, Mashaly Ael-M, Amer T,. Uterine artery occlusion for treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas. JSLS. 2010; 14: 386-90.
28. Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM,. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life-results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35: 530-6.
29. Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O,. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008; 31: 73-85.
30. Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY,. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 387-400.
31. Broder MS, Goodwin S, Chen G, Tang LJ, Costantino MM, Nguyen MH, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 864-8.
32. Gaetje R, Mavrova-Risteska L, Zangos S, Karn T, Kissler S, Vogl T, et al. Clinical outcome after myomectomy versus uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2007; 67: 748-752.
33. Siskin GP, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Goodwin SC, Sterling K, Lipman JC, Nosher JL, et al.; UAE versus Myomectomy Study Group. A prospective multicenter comparative study between myomectomy and uterine artery embolization with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17: 1287-95.
34. Narayan A, Lee AS, Kuo GP, Powe N, Kim HS,. Uterine artery embolization versus abdominal myomectomy: a long-term clinical outcome comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21: 1011-7.
35. Ohgi S, Nakagawa K, Inoue H, Yasuda M, Saito H,. Uterine artery embolization should not be recommended without careful consideration in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007; 33: 506-11.
36. Razavi MK, Hwang G, Jahed A, Modanlou S, Chen B,. Abdominal myomectomy versus uterine fibroid embolization in the treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 1571-5.
37. Spies JB, Bradley LD, Guido R, Maxwell GL, Levine BA, Coyne K,. Outcomes from leiomyoma therapies: comparison with normal controls. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 641-52.
38. Hald K, Langebrekke A, Kløw NE, Noreng HJ, Berge AB, Istre O,. Laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: initial experience and comparison to uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 37-43.
39. Mara M, Kubinova K, Maskova J, Horak P, Belsan T, Kuzel D,. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion: the outcomes of a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35: 1041-52.
40. Mara M, Maskova J, Kubinova K, Horak P, Novotna M, Kuzel D,. Comparison of UAE and laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion (LUAO) for fibroids: the results of non-randomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33: 0174-1551.
41. Park KH, Kim JY, Shin JS, Kwon JY, Koo JS, Jeong KA, et al. Treatment outcomes of uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation for uterine myoma. Yonsei Med J. 2003; 44: 694-702.
42. Qu X, Cheng Z, Yang W, Xu L, Dai H, Hu L,. Controlled clinical trial assessing the effect of laparoscopic uterine arterial occlusion on ovarian reserve. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 47-52.
43. Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V, Diamond J, Daraï E, Seinera P, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 18-21.
44. Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V,. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 869-72.
45. Hovsepian DM, Siskin GP, Bonn J, Cardella JF, Clark TW, Lampmann LE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004; 27: 307-13.
46. Holub Z, Mara M, Kuzel D, Jabor A, Maskova J, Eim J,. Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 1886-91.
47. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62: e1-34.