|
Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 506-511
|
Uterine artery embolization should not be recommended without careful consideration in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids
|
Author keywords
Convalescence; Laparoscopic surgery; Side effect; Uterine artery embolization; Uterine fibroids
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ADVERSE OUTCOME;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY;
EXERCISE;
FATIGUE;
FEMALE;
FEVER;
FOLLOW UP;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MYOMECTOMY;
NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
PAIN;
TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION;
UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION;
UTERUS MYOMA;
VAGINA DISCHARGE;
WORK;
ADULT;
EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LEIOMYOMA;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 34547696770
PISSN: 13418076
EISSN: 14470756
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00580.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (9)
|