Comparison of long‐term outcomes of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 100, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 864-868

  Broder, Michael S ^a   Goodwin, Scott ^b   Chen, Gary ^c   Tang, Linda J ^d   Costantino, Mary M ^e   Nguyen, Michael H ^f   Yegul, Tugce N ^g   Erberich, Heike ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONE;

ABDOMINAL DISTENSION; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSMENORRHEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD; MENORRHAGIA; MYOMECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY FREQUENCY; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERUS MYOMA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIES; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LEIOMYOMA; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 0036854939     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02182-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kjerulff KH, Erickson AB, Langerberg PW. Chronic gynecologic conditions reported by US women: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1984 to 1992. Am J Public Health 1996;86:195-6.
2. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:549-55.
3. Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy in Southern California. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:199-205.
4. Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash EG. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:415-9.
5. La Morte AI, Laiwani S, Diamond MP. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:897-900.
6. Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Messopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: A transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1795-6.
7. Buttram VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: Etiology, symptomatology and management. Fertil Steril 1981;36:433-45.
8. Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Babaki-Fard K, Dubuisson JB. Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:595-602.
9. Ravina J, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Bouret J, Houdart E, Aymard A, et al. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995;346:671-2.
10. Landow W. UAE survey results. SCVIR News. 2000; 14(2):27.
11. Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:29-34.
12. Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Lee M, Chen G, Perrella R, Vedantham S, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999;10:1159-65.
13. Worthington-Kirsch RL, Delaney ML, Hutchins FL. Uterine artery embolization for the management of myomata in patients without complaints of menorrhagia. Minim Invasive Ther 1998;7:27.
14. Walker WJ, Dover R, Sutton C. Bilateral uterine artery embolization for myomas, results and complications. Minim Invasive Ther 1998;7:26.
15. Pron GE, Common AA, Sniderman KW, Bell SD, Simons ME, Vanderburgh LC. Radiological embolization of uterine arteries for symptomatic myomas: Preliminary findings of a Canadian multicenter trial. Minim Invasive Ther 1998;7:26.
16. Broder MS, Harris K, Morton S, Sherbourne C, Brook R. Uterine artery embolization: A systematic review of the literature and proposal for research. RAND Report MR-1138. Santa Monica, California: RAND, 1999.
17. Broder MS, Landow WJ, Goodwin SC, Brook RH, Sherbourne CD, Harris K. An agenda for research into uterine artery embolization: Results of an expert panel conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:509-15.
18. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Kardache M, Dahan H, Abitbol M, et al. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: Treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology 2000;215:428-31.
19. Hwang GI, Razavi MK, Chen BH. A single-center study comparing abdominal myomectomy with uterine artery embolization for treatment of myomas. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(4 Suppl 1):S7.
20. Hutchins FL Jr. Abdominal myomectomy as a treatment for symptomatic uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;22:781-9.
21. Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:237-40.
22. Vercellini P, Maddalena S, De Giorgi OD, Aimi G, Crosignani PG. Abdominal myomectomy for infertility: A comprehensive review. Hum Reprod 1998;13:873-9.
23. Subramanian S, Clark MA, Isaacson K. Outcome and resource use associated with myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:583-7.
24. Matchar DB, Myers ER, Barber MW, Couchman GM, Datta S, Gray RN, et al. Management of uterine fibroids. AHRQ publication no. 01-E052. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001.