Examining adoption of electronic district (e- district) system in Indian context: A validation of extended technology acceptance model

20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Rana, Nripendra P ^a   Dwivedi, Yogesh K ^a   Weerakkody, Vishanth ^b   Piercy, Niall C ^a   Williams, Michael D ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adoption; E district system; E government; India; TAM; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

HARDWARE;

ADOPTION; E-DISTRICT SYSTEM; E-GOVERNMENT; INDIA; TAM; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84905965456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Al-Gahtani, S.S. 2003. "Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes", Information Technology for Development (10:1), pp. 57-69.
2. Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W. 1988. "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach," Psychological Bulletin (103:3), pp. 411-423.
3. Anthopoulos, L.G., Siozons, P., and Tsoukalas, L.A. 2007. "Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services," Government Information Quarterly (24:2), pp. 353-376.
4. Bandura, A. 1977. "Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change," Psychology Review (84:2), pp. 191-215.
5. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bentler, P., and Bonett, D. 1980. "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures," Psychological Bulletin (88:3), pp. 588-606.
7. Boateng, R., Heeks, R., Molla, A., and Hinson, R. 2008. Contributor "E-commerce and socio-economic development: conceptualizing the link," Internet Research (18:5), pp. 565-594.
8. Chiang, L. 2009. "Trust and security in the e-voting system," Electronic Government, an International Journal (6:4), pp. 343-360.
9. Chin, W.W., and Todd, P.A. 1995. "On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution," MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp. 237-246.
10. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. 1989. "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models," Management Science (35:8), pp. 982-1002.
11. Davis, F.D. 1986. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation. Massachusetts: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. Davis, F.D. 1989. "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp. 319-339.
13. Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Zhang, J., and Wang, B. 2008. "Subscription of Mobile Services: The Role of TAM and Trust," 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pp. 1-4.
14. Eze, U.C., Yaw, L.H., Manyeki, J.K., and Har, L.C. 2011. "Contributor Factors Affecting Internet Banking Adoption among Young Adults: Evidence from Malaysia," International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research (5:1), pp. 377-381.
15. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. 1981. "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research (18:1), pp. 39-50.
16. Fusilier, M., and Durlabhji, S. 2005. "An exploration of student Internet use in India the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior," Campus-Wide Information Systems (22:4), pp. 233-246.
17. Gefen, D. 2000. "E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust," Omega: The International Journal of Management Science (28:6), pp. 725-737.
18. Hoyle, R.H. 1995. The Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Basic Concepts and Fundamental Issues. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. Hu, L.-T., and Bentler, P.M. 1999. "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional versus new alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling (6:1), pp. 1-55.
20. Hu, P.J-H., Chen, H., Hu, H-F., Larson, C., and Butierez, C. 2011. " Contributor Law enforcement officers' acceptance of advanced e-government technology: A survey study of COPLINK Mobile," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (10:1), pp. 6-16.
21. Igbaria, M., and Iivari, J. 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega (23:6), pp. 587-605.
22. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L. 1999. " Contributor Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs," MIS Quarterly (23:2), pp. 183-213.
23. Kim, H.J., Pan, G., and Pan, S.L. 2007. " Contributor Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea," Government Information Quarterly (24:2), pp. 338-352.
24. Lu, C-T., Huang, S-Y., and Lo, P-Y. 2010. " Contributor An empirical study of on-line tax filing acceptance model: Integrating TAM and TPB," African Journal of Business Management (4:5), pp. 800-810.
25. Moore, G.C., and Benbasat, I. 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research (2:3), pp. 192-222.
26. Netemeyer, R.G., Johnston, M.W., and Burton, S. 1990. " Contributor Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework," Journal of Applied Psychology (75:2), pp. 148-157.
27. Phang, C.W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B.C.Y., and Teo, H-H. 2006. "Senior Citizens' Acceptance of Information Systems: A Study in the Context of e-Government Services," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (53:4), pp. 555-569.
28. Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S., and Vandenbosch, M. 2001. " Contributor Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system," Information Systems Research (12:2), pp. 208-222.
29. Radner, R., and Rothschild, M. 1975. "On the allocation of effort," Journal of Economic Theory (10:3), pp. 358-376.
30. Rogers, E.M. 2002. "Diffusion of preventive innovations," Addictive Behaviors (27:6), pp.989l-993
31. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.
32. Sambasivan, M., Wemyss, G.P., and Rose, R.C. 2010. "User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia," Internet Research (20:2), pp. 169-187.
33. Steiger, J.H., and Lind, J.C. 1980. "Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors," Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.
34. Susanto, T.D., and Goodwin, R. 2011. "User Acceptance of SMS-Based eGovernment Services," In M. Janssen, H.J. Scholl, M.A. Wimmer, and Y-H. Tan (eds.): EGOV 2011, LNCS 6846, pp. 75-87.
35. Taylor, S., and Todd, P.A. 1995. "Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behaviour: A study of consumer adoption," International Journal of Research in Marketing (12:2), pp. 137-155.
36. Venkatesh, V. 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research (11:4), pp. 342-365.
37. Wang, Y-S. 2002. "The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study," Government Information Quarterly (20:4), pp. 333-352.
38. Wang, Y-S., and Liao, Y-W. 2008. "Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success," Government Information Quarterly (25:4), pp. 717-733.