The value of personal information online: Results from three stated preference discrete choice experiments in the UK

ECIS 2013 - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Potoglou, Dimitris ^a   Patil, Sunil ^b   Palacios, Juan Francisco ^c   Feijóo, Claudio ^c   Gijón, Covadonga ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiments; Insurance; Online purchase; Personal information; Privacy; Pure search; Search engines; Stated preference; UK

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INSURANCE; SEARCH ENGINES;

DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PERSONAL INFORMATION; PURE SEARCH; STATED PREFERENCES; UK;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84905851664     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. 3 IEEE Security Privacy Magazine 26-33 IEEE. doi:10.1109/MSP.2005.22
2. Allenby, G. M., Shively, T. S., Yang, S. and Garratt, M. (2004) A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Science, 23(95-108).
3. Beresford, A. R., Preibusch, S., & Kübler, D. (2010). Unwillingness to Pay for Privacy: A Field Experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No 5017, 117(5017), 25-27. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.077
4. Bierlaire, M. (2003). BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models, Switzerland.
5. Birol, E., Karousakis, K. and Koundouri, P. (2006). Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics, 60, 145-156.
6. Bliemer, M. and Rose, J. M. (2009). 'Designing Stated Choice Experiments: State of the Art' in Kitamura, R., Yoshii, T. and Yamamoto, T., eds., The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 499-538.
7. Bughin, J. (2011). The Webs 100 billion surplus. Retrieved from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The-Webs-100-billion-euro-surplus-2724
8. Cooper, A. (2008). A survey of query log privacy-enhancing techniques from a policy perspective. ACM Trans. Web, 2(4), 1-27. doi:10.1145/1409220. 1409222
9. Cvrcek, D., Kumpost, M., Matyas, V., & Danezis, G. (2006). A study on the value of location privacy. Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society WPES 06, 109. doi:10.1145/1179601.1179621
10. Danezis, G., Lewis, S., & Anderson, R. (2005). How Much is Location Privacy Worth ? Fourth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, 78, 739-748. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01230.x
11. Hann, I. H., Hui, K. L., Lee, T. S., & Png, I. P. L. (2002). Online information privacy: Measuring the cost-benefit trade-off. TwentyThird International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-10). Citeseer.
12. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis-A Primer, New York: Cambridge Univ..
13. Hess, S., Rose, J. M. and Polak, J. (2010). Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(7), 405-417.
14. Hess, S., Train, K. and Polak, J. (2006). On the use of modified Latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of mixed logit model for vehicle choice. Transportation Research Part B, 40(2), 147-163.
15. Huber, J. and Swerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 307-317.
16. Huberman, B. A., Adar, E., & Fine, L. R. (2005). Valuating privacy. 3 IEEE Security Privacy Magazine 22-25doi:10.1109/MSP.2005.137
17. Iraguen, P. and Ortuzar, J. (2004). Willingness-to-pay for reducing fatal accident risk in urban areas: an Internet-based Web page stated preference survey. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 513-524.
18. Kløjgaard, M. E., Bech, M. and Søgaard, R. (2012). Designing a stated choice experiment: The value of qualitative process. Journal of Choice Modelling, 5(2), 1-18.
19. Louviere, J. and Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregated data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
20. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge Press.
21. McFadden, D. (1974). 'Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour' in Zerembka, P., ed. Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, 105-142.
22. Ngene (2010) Ngene 1.0.2 User Manual and Reference Guide: The cutting edge in experimental design, ChoiceMetrics, Sydney.
23. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context. Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Standford U. Press.
24. Office for National Statistics (2011) 'Internet Access-Households and inviduals', available: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference- tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-226727 [accessed Nov. 2012].
25. Ryan, M., Bate, A., Eastmond, C. J. and Ludbrook, A. (2001) Use of discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences. Quality in Health Care, 10(Supplement 1), i55-i60.