Designing a stated choice experiment: The value of a qualitative process

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1-18

  Kløjgaard, Mirja Elisabeth ^a   Bech, Mickael ^a   Søgaard, Rikke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Attribute and level selection; Design; Discrete choice experiment; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880557291     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70050-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, T., J. F., Rihn, S. D., Glassman, B. L., Currier, T. J., Albert and F. M., Phillips, 2009. An Evidence-Based Approach to Spine Surgery. American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(6 Suppl.), 15S-24S.
2. Ashcroft, D.M., E., Seston C. E., Griffiths, 2006. Trade-offs between the benefits and risks of drug treatment for psoriasis: a discrete choice experiment with U.K. dermatologists. British Journal of Dermatology, 155(6), 1236-1241. (Pubitemid 44730001)
3. Baltussen, R. And L., Niessen, 2006. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4(14).
4. Bateman, I. J., R. T., Carson, B., Day, W. M., Hanemann, N., Hanley, T., Hett, M.J., Lee, G., Loomes, S., Mourato, E., Özdemiroglu and D. W., Pearce, 2002. Economic Evaluation with Stated Preference Techniques - A Manual. 1st edition, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham.
5. Bennett, J. and R. K., Blamey, 2001. The Choice Modelling approach to Environmental Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK.
6. Blamey, R. K., J. W., Bennett, J. J., Louviere, M. D., Morrison, and J. C., Rolfe, 2002. Attribute causality in environmental choice modelling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(2), 167-186. (Pubitemid 36006265)
7. Chou, R., J., Baisden, E. J., Carragee, D. K., Resnick, W. O., Shaffer, J. D., Loeser, 2009. Surgery for Low Back Pain. A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine, 34(10), 1094-1109.
8. Coast, J. and S., Horrocks, 2007. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12(1): 25-30. (Pubitemid 46174202)
9. Coast, J., H., Al-Janabi, E. J., Sutton, S., Horrocks, J., Vosper, D. R., Swancutt and T., Flynn, 2012. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Economics, 21(6), 730-741.
10. De Bekker-Grob, E. W., M., Ryan and K., Gerard, 2012. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature. Health Economics, 21(2), 145-172.
11. Goldman, D., Lakdawalla, D., Philipson, T. J. and Yin, W. (2010). Valuing health technologies at NICE: recommendations for improved incorporation of treatment value in HTA. Health Economics, 19: 1109-1116.
12. Green, P. E. and V., Srinivasan, 1978. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research - Issues and Outlook 2. Journal of consumer research, 5(2), 103-123.
13. Hall, J., R., Viney, M., Haas and J. J., Louviere, 2004. Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to evaluate health care programs. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 1026-1032. (Pubitemid 39072432)
14. Hensher, D. A., J. M., Rose and W. H., Greene, 2005. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Irwin, Z. N., A., Hilibrand and M., Gustavel, 2005. Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Spine.1;30(19):2208-13. (Pubitemid 41429202)
16. Kjaer T., D, Gyrd-Hansen and I., Willaing, 2006. Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 22(2), 211-218.
17. Kløjgaard, M., M., Bech, B., Dahl and R., Søgaard, forthcoming. Preferences for Spine Surgery -a Systematic Literature Review.
18. Kuper, A., L., Lingard and W. Levinson, 2008. Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 337(7671).
19. Lancsar, E. And J., Louviere, 2006. Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Economics, 15(8), 797-811. (Pubitemid 44184131)
20. Lancsar, E. and J., Louviere, 2008. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform health care decision making: a user's guide. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(8), 661-677. (Pubitemid 351989058)
21. Lee, Y. T. and E. T., Bradlow, 2007. Automatic construction of conjoint attributes and levels from online consumers reviews. University of Pennsylvania. The Warton School.
22. Mangham, L., 2007. Addressing the Human Resource Crisis in Malawi's Health Sector: Employment preferences of public sector registered nurses, ESAU Working Paper 18.
23. Lloyd, A., E., McIntosh, K. F., Rabe, A., Williams, 2007. Patient preferences for asthma therapy: a discrete choice experiment. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 16(4), 241-248.
24. Louviere, J., D. A., Hensher and J., Swait, 2000. Stated Choice Methods, analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, U.K.
25. Mangham, L. J., K., Hanson and B., McPake, 2009. How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning, 24(2), 151-158.
26. Mark, T. L. And J., Swait, 2003. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value in Health, 6(4), 474-482. (Pubitemid 36929736)
27. Mays, N. And C., Pope, 2000. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320(7226), 50-52.
28. Mortimer, D. and L., Segal, 2008. Is the value of a life or life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 6(8).
29. Peters, E., D., Vastfjall, P., Slovic, C. K., Mertz, K., Mazzocco and S., Dickert, 2006.Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407-413. (Pubitemid 43657915)
30. Philips, K. A., F. R., Johnson and T., Maddala 2001. Measuring what people value: A comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys. Health Services Research, 37(6), 1659-1679. (Pubitemid 36070259)
31. Phillips, K.A., T., Maddala and F. R., Johnson, 2002. Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing. Health Services Research, 37(6), 1681-1705. (Pubitemid 36070260)
32. Ratcliffe, J., M., Buxton, T., McGarry, R, Sheldon and J. Chancellor, 2004. Patients' preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford), 43(3), 337-345. (Pubitemid 38313184)
33. Ratcliffe, J., R., Van Haselen, M., Buxton, K., Hardy, J., Colehan and M., Partridge, 2002. Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. Thorax, 57(6), 503-508. (Pubitemid 34627981)
34. Ratcliffe, J. and L., Longworth, 2002. Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(1), 139-144. (Pubitemid 34408536)
35. Roux, L., C., Ubach, C., Donaldson, and M., Ryan, 2004. Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: an application of the discrete choice experiment. Obesity Research, 12(8), 1342-1351. (Pubitemid 41137479)
36. Ryan, M. and K., Gerard, 2003. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care: current practice and future prospects. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2(1), 55-64.
37. Ryan, M., 1999. A role for conjoint analysis in technology assessment in health care? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15(3), 443-457. (Pubitemid 29466178)
38. Salkeld, G., M., Solomon, L., Short, M., Ryan and J. E., Ward 2003. Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 449-455. (Pubitemid 37038228)
39. Sculpher, M., S., Bryan, P., Fry, P., de Winter, H., Payne and M. Emberton, 2004. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. British Medical Journal, 328(7436): 382.
40. Seston, E.M., R. A., Elliott, P. R., Noyce and K., Payne, 2007. Women's preferences for the provision of emergency hormonal contraception services. Pharmacy World and Science, 29(3), 183-189. (Pubitemid 46872980)
41. Shackley P, R., Slack and J., Michaels, 2001. Vascular patients' preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 6(3), 151-157. (Pubitemid 32607102)
42. Smith H.E., J. F., Rihn, D. S., Brodke, R., Guyer, D., Coric, B., Lonner, A.P., Shelokov, B. L., Currier, L., Riley, F. M., Phillips and T. J., Albtert, 2009. Spine Care: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Cost of Emerging Technology. American Journal of Medical Quality. 24(6 Suppl), 25S-31S.
43. Telser, H. and P., Zweifel, 2002. Measuring willingness-to-pay for risk reduction: an application of conjoint analysis. Health Economics, 11(2), 129-139. (Pubitemid 34257015)
44. Yi. D., M., Ryan, S., Campbell, A., Elliott, N., Torrance, A., Chambers, M., Johnston, P., Hannaford and B. H., Smith, 2011. Using discrete choice experiments to inform randomised controlled trials: an application to chronic low back pain management in primary care. European Journal of Pain, 15(5), 531.e1-531.e10.