The use of ict in public decision-making participation

ECIS 2013 - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Alexandra, Cunha Maria ^a   Ritta, Coelho Taiane ^b   Marlei, Pozzebon ^c  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Critical discourse analysis; Digital participative budget; Electronic participation; Information and communication technology; Social representations theory

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; DIGITAL PARTICIPATIVE BUDGET; ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS;

BUDGET CONTROL;

EID: 84905845365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Abric, J. C. (1994). Méthodologie de recueil des représentations sociales. In: Abric, J.C. Pratiques socials et représentations. Paris, França: Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Ainsworth, S., Hardy, C. and Harley, B. (2005). Online Consultation: e-democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 120-145.
3. Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133.
4. Audebrand, L. and Iacobus, A. (2008). Avoiding Potential Traps in Fair Trade Marketing: A Social Representation Perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16, 3-19.
5. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community and Accelerated Pluralism. Polity. XXXI (1), 133-160.
6. Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. I. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, Oxford, UK.
7. Cukier, W. And Ngwenyama, O, Bauer, R. &Midletton, C. (2008). A Critical Analyses of Media Discourse on Information Technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analyses. Info Systems Journal, 19, 175-196. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.
8. Dertouzos, M. (1997). What Will Be: How the New Information Marketplace will Change Our Lives. Harper, San Francisco, CA.
9. Doolin, B. (1998). Information Technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13, 301.
10. Fairclough, N. (1996). A Reply to Henry Winddowson's Discourse Analyses: A Critical View. Language and Literature, 5(1), 1-8.
11. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analyses: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London, UK.
12. Gal, U. and Berente, N. (2008). A social representations perspective in information systems implementation: Rethinking the concept of "frames". Information Technology &People, 21(2), 133-154. Doi: 10.1108/09593840810881051.
13. Grönlund, Å. (2001). Democracy in an IT-framed society. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 23-26.
14. Grönlund, Å. and Horan, T. (2005). Introducing e-GOV: History, definitions and issues. Communications of the AIS, 15, 713-729.
15. Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. Discourse and power. (2004). In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick,& L. Putnam (Eds.). Handbook of organizational discourse , pp. 299-316. London, UK: Sage.
16. Kaganer, E. and Vaast, E. (2010). Responding to the (almost) unknown: Social representations and corporate policies of social media. ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
17. Kling, R. (ed). (1996). Hopes and Horrors: Technological Utopianism and anti-Utopianism in Narratives of Computerization. In R. Kling. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
18. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, France.
19. Moscovici, S. (2001). The phenomenon of social representations. In G. Duveen (Ed.). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. New York University Press, New York, NY.
20. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu, HI, USA.
21. Macintosh, A. (2007). Challenges and barriers of eParticipation in Europe? Mendeley. Downloaded on: 27 may 2012. Obtained in: http://www.sweden. gov.se/content/1/c6/08/49/42/9d411e53.pdf.
22. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. Knopf , New York, NY.
23. Ngwenyama, O.K. and Lee, A.S. (1997). Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextually of Meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-167.
24. Pawlowski, S.D., Kaganer, E.A. and Cater III, J.J. (2007). Focusing the research agenda on burnout in IT: Social representations of burnout in the profession. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(5), 612-627.
25. Pozzebon, M. (2003). The implementation of Configurable Technologies: negotiations between global principles and local contexts. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
26. Pinho, J. A. G.(2011). Sociedade da informação, capitalismo e sociedade civil: reflexões, sobre política, internet e democracia na realidade brasileira. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 51(1), 098-106.
27. Prefeitura BH. (2008). Revista Comemorativa do Orçamento Participativo de BH 15 anos.
28. Rose, J., Grönlund, A. and Andersen, K., V. (2007). What is eParticipation?. In A. Avdic, K. Hedström, J. Rose, Å. Grönlund (ed). Understanding eParticipation: Contemporary PhD eParticipation Studies in Europe. Örebro University Library, Sweden.
29. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., and Flak, K. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 400-428.
30. Sucha, I. and Grönlund, A. (2012). eParticipation research: Systematizing the field. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 373-382. Doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.11.005
31. Thompson, M.P.A. (2004). ICT, Power, and Developmental Discourse: A critical analyses. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20, 1-26.
32. Vaast, E. (2007). Danger is in the eye of the beholders: social representations in information systems security in healthcare. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 130-52.
33. Vaast, E. and Walsham, G. (2005). Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization, 14, 65-89.
34. Winner, L. (1986). Mythinformation: romantic politics in the information age. In C. Mitcham &A. Huning (ed.). Philosophy and technology II: Information technology and computers in theory and practice. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Holanda.