Pointwise ensemble of meta-models using v nearest points cross-validation

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 383-394

  Lee, Yongbin ^a   Choi, Dong Hoon ^b  

^a PIDOTECH Inc   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Meta model; Pointwise ensemble of meta models; v nearest points cross validation

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; FUNCTIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURATE PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE CONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS; META MODEL; NEAREST POINT; POINT OF INTEREST; PREDICTION PERFORMANCE; ROBUST PREDICTIONS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84905818324     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-014-1067-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidiscip O 37:279-294
2. Balabanov V, Haftka RT, Grossman B, Mason WH, Watson LT (1998) Multifidelity response model for HSCT wing bending material weight. In: Proceedings of 7th AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. St Louis, pp AIAA Paper 98-4804
3. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Design 127:1077-1087 (Pubitemid 41709565)
5. Craig KJ, Stander N, Dooge DA, Varadappa S (2002) MDO of automotive vehicles for crashworthiness and NVH using response surface methods. In: Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Atlanta, pp AIAA Paper 2002-5607
6. Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121-2136 (Pubitemid 41084679)
7. Giunta AA, Balabanov V, Haim D, Grossman B, Mason WH, Watson LT, Haftka RT (1997) Multidisciplinary optimisation of a supersonic transport using design of experiments theory and response surface modeling. Aeronaut J 101:347-356 (Pubitemid 127547509)
8. Giunta AA, Watson LT (1998) A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models. In: Proceedings of 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. St. Louis, pp AIAA Paper 98-4758
9. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip O 33:199-216 (Pubitemid 46198778)
10. Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip O 23:1-13 (Pubitemid 34271934)
11. Kurtaran H, Eskandarian A, Marzougui D, Bedewi NE (2002) Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations. Comput Mech 29:409-421 (Pubitemid 35422280)
12. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
13. Orr MJL (1996) Introduction to radial basis neural networks. Techncal report-Center for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh University, Scotland
14. Park JS (1994) Optimal latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Infer 39:95-111
15. Queipo NV, Goicochea JV, Pintos S (2002a) Surrogate modeling-based optimization of SAGD processes. J Petrol Sci Eng 35:83-93 (Pubitemid 34866035)
16. Queipo NV, Verde AJ, Canelon J, Pintos S (2002b) Efficient global optimization for hydraulic fracturing treatment design. J Petrol Sci Eng 35:151-166 (Pubitemid 35003395)
17. Sacks J, Welch W, Mitchell T, Wynn H (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409-435
18. Sanchez E, Pintos S, Queipo NV (2008) Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications. Struct Multidiscip O 36:247-261
19. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199-222 (Pubitemid 39063488)
20. Stander N, Roux W, Giger M, Redhe M, Fedorova N, Haarhoff J (2004) A comparison of meta-modeling techniques for crashworthiness optimization. In: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Albany, pp AIAA-2004-4489
21. Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK, Papila N, Shyy W (2004) Computational-fluid- dynamics-based design optimization for single-element rocket injector. J Propul Power 20:705-717
22. Wang L, Beeson D, Wiggs G, Rayasam M (2006) A comparison of metamodeling methods using practical industry requirements. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Newport, pp AIAA Paper 06-1811
23. Zerpa LE, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J-L (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Petrol Sci Eng 47:197-208 (Pubitemid 40829362)