Are we getting the critical view? A prospective study of photographic documentation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

HPB

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 859-863

  Lam, Tracey ^a   Usatoff, Val ^a,b   Chan, Steven T F ^a,b  

^a WESTERN HEALTH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CYSTIC DUCT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ARTERY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DOCUMENTATION; GALLBLADDER; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CYSTIC DUCT; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODDS RATIO; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905719719     PISSN: 1365182X     EISSN: 14772574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12243     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D'Acapito F, Vellone M, etal. (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140: 986-992. (Pubitemid 41464467)
2. Savassi-Rocha PR, Ferreira JT, Diniz MT, Sanchez SR,. (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brazil: analysis of 33563 cases. Int Surg 82: 208-213. (Pubitemid 27443033)
3. Wu YV, Linehan DC,. (2010) Bile duct injuries in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Clin North Am 90: 787-802.
4. Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R, Wibin E, Dallemagne B, Deweer F, etal. (1997) The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 11: 1171-1178. (Pubitemid 127524453)
5. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, etal. (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196-202.
6. Dekker SW, Hugh TB,. (2008) Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg 78: 1109-1114.
7. Kholdebarin R, Boetto J, Harnish JL, Urbach DR,. (2008) Risk factors for bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-control study. Surg Innov 15: 114-119. (Pubitemid 351728973)
8. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ,. (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180: 101-105.
9. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM,. (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211: 132-138.
10. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. (2008) Surgical Audit and Peer Review: A Guide By the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 3rd edn. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
11. Ludbrook J,. (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29: 527-536. (Pubitemid 34639322)
12. Buddingh KT, Morks AN, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Blauww CB, van Dam GM, Ploeg RJ, etal. (2012) Documenting the correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26: 79-85.
13. Gale EAM,. (2004) The Hawthorne studies-a fable for our times? Q J Med 97: 439-449. (Pubitemid 38967418)
14. Plaiser PW, Pauwels MMS, Lange JF,. (2001) Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print? HPB 3: 197-199. (Pubitemid 34149999)
15. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, etal. (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 873-885.
16. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Quality Working Group. (2009) Improving Colonoscopy Services in Australia [WWW document]. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. URL http://www. cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/ 3FD09B61D2B4E286CA25770B007D1537/$File/Improving%20col%20serv0709.pdf (last accessed 29 December 2013).
17. Chandrasekhar S, Randolph G, Seidman M, etal. (2013) Clinical practice guideline: improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148 (6 Suppl.): S1-S37. doi: 10.1177/0194599813487301 [WWW document]. URL http://oto.sagepub.com/content/148/6-suppl/S1.full.pdf+html (last accessed 29 December 2013).
18. Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, Thomas A, Buie WD, Cataldo P, etal. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1269-1284. (Pubitemid 39180201)
19. Connor SJ, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ,. (2013) Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB (Oxford). [WWW document]. URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.surgeons.org/doi/10.1111/hpb.12161/full (last accessed 29 December 2013).
20. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad DC, Horgan S, etal. (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189: 566-574.