Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-85

  Buddingh, K T ^a   Morks, A N ^a   Ten Cate Hoedemaker, H O ^a   Blaauw, C B ^a   Van Dam, G M ^a   Ploeg, R J ^a   Hofker, H S ^a   Nieuwenhuijs, V B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Critical view of safety; Intraoperative cholangiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC DUCT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TREATMENT INDICATION; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGITIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; DOCUMENTATION; GALLSTONE; HISTOLOGY; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREATITIS; PATHOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD;

CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLECYSTITIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; CYSTIC DUCT; DOCUMENTATION; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREATITIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84857431595     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1831-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101-125
2. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229:449-457 (Pubitemid 30191740)
3. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289:1639-1644 (Pubitemid 37430268)
4. Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152, 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141:1207-1213 (Pubitemid 44956636)
5. Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JBF, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1639-8
6. Lange JF, Stassen LPS (2006) Best practice: De techniek van de laparoscopische cholecystectomie (Critical View of Safety [CVS]; Werkgroep Endoscopische Chirurgie van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Heelkunde)
7. Emous M, Westerterp M, Wind J, Eerenberg JP, van Geloven AA (2010) Registering the critical view of safety: photo or video? Surg Endosc 24:2527-2530
8. Plaisier P, Pauwels M, Lange J (2001) Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print? HPB Oxford 3:197-199 (Pubitemid 34149999)
9. Buddingh KT, Weersma RK, Savenije RA, van Dam GM, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2011) Lower rate of major bile duct injury and increased intraoperative management of common bile duct stones after implementation of routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg [Epub ahead of print]
10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
11. Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 211:1-7
12. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132-138
13. Buddingh KT, Hofker HS, Cate Hoedemaker HO, van Dam GM, Ploeg RJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2011) Safety measures during cholecystectomy: results of a nationwide survey. World J Surg 35:1235-1241
14. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, Hunter JG (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460-469 (Pubitemid 38176423)
15. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Donohue JH, Fletcher DR, Hunter JG, Oddsdottir M, Rossi RL, Tsao J, Windsor J (1995) Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 9:1076-1080
16. Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251:682-685
17. de Reuver PR, Wind J, Cremers JE, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ (2008) Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice. J Am Coll Surg 206:328-334
18. Scurr JR, Brigstocke JR, Shields DA, Scurr JH (2010) Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:286-291
19. de Reuver PR, Dijkgraaf MG, Gevers SK, Gouma DJ (2008) Poor agreement among expert witnesses in bile duct injury malpractice litigation: an expert panel survey. Ann Surg 248:815-820
20. Chandler JG, Voyles CR, Floore TL, Bartholomew LA (1997) Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps. J Gastrointest Surg 1:138-145 (Pubitemid 127433831)
21. Stewart L, Hunter JG, Wetter A, Chin B, Way LW (2010) Operative reports: form and function. Arch Surg 145:865-871