The Individualised Patient-Progress System: A decade of international collaborative networking

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 181-191

  Sales, Célia M D ^a,b,c   Alves, P C G ^d   Evans, C ^f   Elliott, R ^g   Almeida, S ^h   Ashworth, M ^d   Cruz, A S ⁱ   Del Pino Montesinos, J I ^j   Fernandes, S ^k   Falcao C ^l   Fialho, T ^m   Gomez Sousa, M ^j   Gonzalez, A ^k   Lucas, P ^k   Lucas, C ⁿ   Magalhaes A ^l   Moita, G ^o   Oliveira, F ⁿ   Beviá, F Ortega ^p   Pereira, J ^q   García, J Perez ^r   Prata, F X Pina ^s   Silva, E ^h   Soares, L ⁿ   Sousa, D ^k   Vieira, F ^t   Tavares, S ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF MAIA   (Portugal)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e EAST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^h PORTUGUESE ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE   (Portugal)

ⁱ UNIVERSIDADE FERNANDO PESSOA   (Portugal)

^j HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN MACARENA   (Spain)

^k ISPA   (Portugal)

^l Hospital do Espirito Santo   (Portugal)

^m HOSPITAL DE SANTA MARIA   (Portugal)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF MADEIRA   (Portugal)

^o Letrnia Du Universideade do Porto   (Portugal)

^p UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^q Casa de Alba   (Spain)

^r BCN   (Spain)

^s UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^t UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

more..

Author keywords

individualised measures; IPPS; outcome monitoring; personalised assessment; practice research networks; psychotherapy outcome

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905685551     PISSN: 14733145     EISSN: 17461405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14733145.2014.929417     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alves, P. C., Sales, C. M., & Ashworth, M. (2013). Enhancing the patient involvement in outcomes: A study protocol of personalised outcome measurement in the treatment of substance misuse. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 337-349. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-337
2. Ashworth, M., Shepherd, M., Christey, J., Matthews, V., Wright, K., Parmentier, H., Godfrey, E. (2004). A client-generated psychometric instrument: The development of 'PSYCHLOPS'. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4(2), 27-31. doi:10.1080/14733140412331383913
3. Barkham, M., & Margison, F. (2007). Practice-based evidence as a complement to evidence-based practice: From dichotomy to chiasmus. In C. Freeman & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based psychotherapies: A guide for research and practice (pp. 443-476). Chichester: John Wiley.
4. Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., Evans, R., Evans, C., & Margison, F. (2010). The CORE measures & CORE system: Measuring, monitoring, and managing quality evaluation in the psychological therapies. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psychological therapies (pp. 175-219). Chichester: Wiley.
5. Carvalho, M. J., Faustino, I., Nascimento, A., & Sales, C. M. D. (2008). Understanding Pamina's recovery: An application of the hermeneutic single-case efficacy design. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 8, 166-173. doi:10.1080/14733140802211002
6. Cummings, A. L., Martin, J., Hallberg, E., & Slemon, A. (1992). Memory for therapeutic events, session effectiveness and working alliance in short-term counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 306-312. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.306
7. Elliott, R. (1993). Helpful aspects of therapy form. Retrieved from http://www.experiential-researchers.org/instruments/elliott/hat.pdf
8. Elliott, R. (2001). The Client Change Interview protocol. Retrieved from http://www.experiential-researchers.org/instruments/elliott/hat.pdf
9. Elliott, R. (2002). Hermeneutic single-case efficacy design. Psychotherapy Research, 12(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/713869614
10. Elliott, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy research, 20(2), 123-135. doi:10.1080/10503300903470743
11. Elliott, R., Mack, C., & Shapiro, D. (1999). Simplified personal questionnaire procedure. Retrieved from http://www.experiential-researchers.org/instruments/elliott/pqprocedure.html
12. Elliott, R., Wagner, J., Sales, C., Rodgers, B., Alves, P., & Café, M. (submitted). Psychometrics of the simplified personal questionnaire: A client-generated outcome measure. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(1), 51-60. doi:10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
14. Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247-255. doi:10.1080/713680250
15. Gray, P., & Mellor-Clark, J. (Eds.). (2007). CORE: A decade of development. Rugby: CORE IMS.
16. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172.
17. Llewelyn, S. P. (1988). Psychological therapy as viewed by clients and therapists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 223-237. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00779.x
18. Lucas, C., Soares, L., Oliveira, F., Sales, C. M. D., & Alves, P. C. G. (2012, October). IPPS in routine clinical settings: The experience of Psychological Counselling Service of Madeira University. Oral presentation at the 3rd Meeting of SPR European and UK Chapters, Porto, Portugal.
19. McLeod, J. (1999). Practitioner research in counselling. London: Sage.
20. Pereira, J. G., & Romão de Sousa, J. (2014). Casa de Alba: Therapeutic community for severe mental health problems. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 16(1), 61-68. doi:10.1080/13642537.2013.879331
21. Sales, C. M. D. (2005). Terapia Familiar en Contexto Psiquia′ trico - Aportaciones para la Comprensión del Cambio Psicoterapéutico [Family therapy in the psychiatric context - Towards psychotherapeutic change understanding] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
22. Sales, C. M. D., & Alves, P. C. G. (2012). Individualized Patient-progress systems: Why we need to move towards a personalized evaluation of psychological treatments [Special issue about tracking systems]. Canadian Psychology, 53(2), 115-121. doi:10.1037/a0028053
23. Sales, C. M. D., & Alves, P. C. G. (submitted). Measurement of the patient perspective: A review of tools and research designs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24. a cibernética de la prática investigada en terapia familiar [Towards a 3rd cibernetic of researched practice in family therapy?]. Oral presentation at the XXIII Congreso Nacional de Terapia Familiar de la Federación Española de Asociaciones de Terapia Familiar, Universidade Pontifícia de Salamanca, Spain.
25. Sales, C., Gonçalves, S., Fragoeiro, A., Noronha, S., & Elliott, R. (2007). Psychotherapists openness to routine naturalistic idiographic research. Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 4, 145-161. doi:10.5920/mhldrp.2007.42145
26. Sales, C. M. D., Gonçalves, S., Silva, I. F., Duarte, J., Sousa, D., Fernandes, E., Sousa, Z., & Elliott, R. (2007, March). Portuguese adaptation of qualitative change process instruments. Paper presented at The European Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Funchal, Portugal.
27. Sales, C. M. D., Moleiro, C., Evans, C., & Alves, P. C. G. (2012). Versão Portuguesa do CORE-OM: Tradução, adaptação e estudo preliminar das suas propriedades psicométricas [CORE-OM: Translation, adaptation and preliminary study of its psychometric properties]. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 39, 54-59. doi:10.1590/S0101-60832012000200003
28. Sales, C. M. D., & Wakker, P. P. (2009). The metric-frequency measure of similarity for ill-structured data sets, with an application to family therapy. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 663-682. doi:10.1348/000711008X376070