Interdisciplinary application of structuration theory for e-government: A case study of an IT-enabled budget reform

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages

  Puron Cid, Gabriel ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Electronic government; Interdisciplinary; Structuration theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873057277     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Basettihalli R., Kim H.-W., Lee H.-L., Noh S.-E. Structural analysis of e-government in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems 2010, 20(2):1-21.
2. Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43(1):50-65.
3. Bryant C.G., Jary D. The uses of structuration theory: A typology 2001, Palgrave, Houndmills.
4. Clemons E.K., Reddi S.P., Row M.C. Impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The "move to the middle" hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems 1993, 10(2):9-35.
5. Dawes S.S., Eglene O. New models of collaboration for delivering government services: A dynamic model drawn from multi-national research. CTG Working Paper, No. 01-2008 2008.
6. Dawes S.S., Helbig N., Gil-García J.R. Highlights: Exploring the feasibility of a digital government journal 2004, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY.
7. Dawes S.S., Pardo T.A. Building collaborative digital government systems. Advances in digital government. Technology, human factors, and policy 2002, 259-273. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. W.J. McIver, A. Elmagarmid (Eds.).
8. Dawes S.S., Préfontaine L. Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM 2003, 46:40-42.
9. De Lancer Julnes P., Holzer M. Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review 2001, 61(6):693-708.
10. DeSanctis G., Poole M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 1994, 5(2):121-147.
11. Eglene O., Dawes S.S., Schneider C.A. Authority and leadership patterns in public sector knowledge networks. American Review of Public Administration 2007, 37:91-112.
12. Elgarah W., Falaleeva N., Saunders C.S., Ilie V., Shim J.T., Courtney J.F. Data exchange in interorganizational relationships: Review through multiple conceptual lenses. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 2005, 36(1).
13. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change 2001, The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
14. Gant J.P. Digital government and geographic information systems. Digital government: Principles and best practices 2004, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA. A. Pavlichev, A. Garson. (Eds.).
15. Garson G.D. The promise of digital government. Digital government: Principles and best practices 2004, 2-15. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA. A. Pavlichev, A. Garson (Eds.).
16. Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis 1979, Macmillan, London.
17. Giddens A. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration 1984, Polity (publisher), Cambridge.
18. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2005). Enacting state websites: A mixed method study exploring e-government success in multi-organizational settings. Ph.D., University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.
19. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A. e-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(2):187-216.
20. Grizzle G.A., Pettijohn C.D. Implementing performance-based program budgeting: A system-dynamics perspective. Public Administration Review 2002, 62(1). (January/February 2, (X)X).
21. Heeks R. Implementing and managing eGovernment. An international context 2006, Sage Publications, London.
22. Ingraham P.W. In pursuit of performance management systems in state and local government 2007, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
23. Jones M.R., Karsten H. Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly 2008, 23(1):127-157.
24. Karahanna E., Watson R.T. Information systems leadership. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2006, 53(171-176).
25. Lüder K.G. A contingency model of governmental accounting innovations in the political-administrative environment. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting 1992, 7:99-127.
26. MacIntosh N.B., Scapens R.W. Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1990, 15(5):455-477.
27. Melkers J.E., Willoughby K.G. Budgeters' views of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review 2001, 61(1):54-64. (Jan.-Feb.).
28. OECD The e-Government imperative 2003, OECD, Paris, France.
29. OECD Performance budgeting in OECD countries 2007, OECD, Paris, France.
30. Orlikowski W.J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1992, 3(3):398-427.
31. Orlikowski W.J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 2000, 11:404-428.
32. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Dawes S.S., Burke G.B. Modeling the social and technical processes of interorganizational information integration. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii 2004.
33. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Thompson F., Zhang J. Knowledge sharing in cross-boundary information systems development. Journal of Information Technology and Management 2006, 7(4).
34. Pardo T.A., Gil-Garcia J.R., Burke G.B. Building response capacity through cross-boundary information sharing: The critical role of trust. Expanding the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies 2006, IOS Press, Amsterdam. P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (Eds.).
35. Pardo T.A., Gil-Garcia J.R., Burke G.B., Pardo T.A., Gil-Garcia J.R., Burke G.B. Informal leadership and networks: Lessons from the response to the West Nile Virus outbreak. Expanding the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies 2007, IOS Press, Amsterdam. P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (Eds.).
36. Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public management reform: An international comparison 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Puron-Cid, G. (2010). Extending structuration theory: A study of an IT-enabled budget reform in Mexico. Ph.D., University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.
38. Scapens R.W., MacIntosh N.B. Structure and agency in management accounting research: A response to Boland's interpretative act. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1996, 21(7/8).
39. Schick A. Getting performance budgeting to perform. Paper presented at the Conferencia Internacional de Presupuesto por Resultados, Mexico City 2008.
40. Scholl Hans J. Electronic government: A study domain past its infancy. Electronic Government: Information, Technology and Transformation 2009, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk. H.J. Scholl (Ed.).
41. Scholz R.W., Tietje O. Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge 2002, Sage Publications Inc., London.
42. Seal W. Modernity, modernization and the deinstitutionalization of incremental budgeting in local government. Financial Accountability and Management 2003, 19(2):93-116.
43. SHCP Propuesta de decreto que reforma, adiciona y deroga diversas disposiciones de la Constitucion Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2007, March.
44. SHCP Lineamientos Generales para el Proceso de Programacion y Presupuestacion para el Ejercicio Fiscal 2008 2007, (07/17/2007)
45. SHCP Directrices Generales para Avanzar hacia el Presupuesto basado en Resultados y el Sistema de Evaluacion del Desempeño 2007, (07/17/2007).
46. SHCP Lineamientos para la Integracion del Proyecto de Presupuesto de Egresos de la Federacion para el Ejercicio Fiscal 2008 2007, (08/22/2007)
47. SHCP Manual del Usuario Version 1.0 del Sistema de Evaluacion del Desempeno SED. Carga de Matriz de Marco Logico 2007, May.
48. SHCP Lineamientos para el Seguimiento de los Avances en el Cumplimiento de las Metas de los Indicadores del Presupuesto de Egresos de la Federacion para el Ejercicio Fiscal 2009 2009, (04/02/2009)
49. Sydow J., Windeler A. Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science 1998, 9:265-284.
50. Van Reeth, W. (2002). The bearable lightness of budgeting. An explorative research on the uneven implementation of performance oriented budget reform. Ph.D. Doctoral Degree Thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Germany.
51. Van Veenstra A.F., Janssen M., Tan Y.H. Towards an understanding of E-government induced change-Drawing on organization and structuration theories. International Federation for Information Processing 2010, 1-12. M.A. Wimmer (Ed.).
52. Walsham G., Han C.K. Information systems strategy formation and implementation: The case of a central government agency. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 1993, 3(3):191-209.
53. Wang X.-H. Assessing performance measurement impact: A study of U.S. local governments. Public Performance and Management Review 2002, 26(1):26-43.
54. Yin R.K. Case study research, design and methods 2003, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.