Periacetabular bone metabolism following hip revision surgery: PET-based evaluation of allograft osteointegration;Messung des periacetabulären knochenstoffwechsels nach hüftendoprothesenwechsel: Eine PET-Studie zur osteointegration von allografts

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 147-154

  Bernstein, Peter ^a   Beuthien Baumann, B ^a   Kotzerke, J ^a   Hofheinz, F ^b   Zessin, J ^b   Stiehler, M ^a   Gunther K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF ION BEAM PHYSICS AND MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acetabular; Allograft; Bone metabolism; Endoprosthesis; NaF PET

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; DICLOFENAC; SODIUM FLUORIDE F 18; TANTALUM; TRACER; FLUORINE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; SODIUM FLUORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE IMPLANT; BONE METABOLISM; BONE REGENERATION; CANCELLOUS BONE ALLOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARD UPTAKE VALUE; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRABECULAR BONE; ACETABULUM; ALLOGRAFT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC USE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ACETABULUM; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLOGRAFTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; HUMANS; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SODIUM FLUORIDE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905510661     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0607-13-06     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aarvold A, Smith JO, Tayton ER et al. From bench to clinic and back: skeletal stem cells and impaction bone grafting for regeneration of bone defects. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012; doi: 10.1002/term.1577.
2. Bailey DL, Willowson KP. Quantitative SPECT/ CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2542-4.
3. Berding G, Burchert W, van den Hoff J et al. Evaluation of the incorporation of bone grafts used in maxillofacial surgery with [18 F]fluoride ion and dynamic positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22: 1133-1140.
4. Bernstein P, Bornhäuser M, Günther K-P, Stiehler M. Knochen Tissue Engineering in der klinischen Anwendung-eine Standortbestimmung. Orthopäde 2009; 38: 1029-1037.
5. Blake GM, Park-Holohan SJ, Cook GJ, Fogelman I. Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18 F-fluoride and 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate. Semin Nucl Med 2001; 31: 28-49.
6. Fujikawa Y, Torisu T, Takasita M, Masumi S. Grafted bone used in acetabular reconstruction: assessment by SPECT scintigraphy. Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24: 441-445.
7. Hawkins RA, Choi Y, Huang SC et al. Evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of fluorine-18-fluoride ion with PET. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 633-642.
8. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Iranpour F et al. Clinical value of SPECT/CT for evaluation of patients with painful knees after total knee arthroplasty-a new dimension of diagnostics? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 36.
9. Hofheinz F, Langner J, Petr J et al. A method for model-free partial volume correction in oncological PET. EJNMMI Res 2012; 2: 16.
10. Hofheinz F, Potzsch C, Oehme L et al. Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET. Evaluation of a dedicated software tool and comparison with manual delineation in clinical data sets. Nuklearmedizin 2012; 51: 9-16.
11. Hsu WK, Feeley BT, Krenek L et al. The use of 18 F-fluoride and 18 F-FDG PET scancs to assess fracture healing in a rat femur model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 1291-1301.
12. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 33-44.
13. Piert M, Winter E, Becker GA, Bilger K, Machulla H, Muller-Schauenburg W, et al. Allogenic bone graft viability after hip revision arthroplasty assessed by dynamic [18 F]fluoride ion positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 615-624.
14. Piert M, Zittel T, Becker G et al. Assessment of porcine bone metabolism by dynamic [18 F]fluoride ion PET: correlation with bone histomorphometry. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1091-1100.
15. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria 2011.
16. Sörensen J, Ullmark G, Långström B, Nilsson O. Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morselized allografts. Acta Orthop 2003; 74: 633-643.
17. Strobel K, Steurer-Dober I, Huellner MW et al. Importance of SPECT/CT for knee and hip joint prostheses. Radiologe 2012; 52: 629-635.
18. Tagil M, Jeppsson C, Aspenberg P. Bone graft incorporation. Effects of osteogenic protein-1 and impaction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 371: 240-245.
19. Tam HH, Bhaludin B, Rahman F et al. SPECT-CT in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 82-95.
20. Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Heyligers IC et al. Bone metabolism after total hip revision surgery with impacted grafting: Evaluation using H2 15 O and [18 F]fluoride PET. A pilot study. Mol Imaging Biol 2008; 10: 288-293.
21. Tsiridis E, Ali Z, Bhalla A, Heliotis M et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Optimization of Impaction Allografting by Demineralization and Addition of rh-OP-1. J Orth Res 2007; 25: 1425-1437.
22. Ullmark G, Sundgren K, Milbrink J et al. Osteonecrosis following resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 670-674.
23. Ullmark G, Sundgren K, Milbrink J, Nilsson O. Femoral head viability following resurfacing arthroplasty. A clinical positron emission tomography study. Hip Int 2011; 21: 66-70.