Clinical value of SPECT/CT for evaluation of patients with painful knees after total knee arthroplasty - A new dimension of diagnostics?

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Hirschmann, Michael T ^a   Konala, Praveen ^b   Iranpour, Farhad ^b   Kerner, Anna ^c   Rasch, Helmut ^c   Friederich, Niklaus F ^a  

^a Kantonsspital Bruderholz ^*  (Switzerland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETIDRONIC ACID TC 99M;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ADULT; AGED; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79551574967     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-36     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. DA Dennis, J Arthroplasty 2004 19 (Pubitemid 38746714)
2. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. V Mandalia K Eyres P Schranz AD Toms, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 3 265 271 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.20140 18310744 (Pubitemid 351428938)
3. The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. AD Toms V Mandalia R Haigh B Hopwood, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009 91 2 143 150 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.20995 19190044
4. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? PF Sharkey WJ Hozack RH Rothman S Shastri SM Jacoby, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 404 7 13 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003 12439231 (Pubitemid 35351042)
5. Combined single-photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT): clinical value for the knee surgeons? MT Hirschmann F Iranpour K Davda H Rasch R Hugli NF Friederich, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009 18 3 341 345 10.1007/s00167-009-0879-9 19629436
6. A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography. MT Hirschmann F Iranpour P Konala A Kerner H Rasch JP Cobb NF Friederich, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010 18 7 934 944 10.1007/s00167-010-1070-z 20148326
7. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Henckel R Richards K Lozhkin S Harris FM Baena AR Barrett JP Cobb, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006 88 11 1513 1518 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17986 17075100 (Pubitemid 44782136)
8. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. T Suter M Zanetti M Schmid J Romero, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 5 744 748 10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.012 16877163 (Pubitemid 44108579)
9. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: A literature review. J Victor, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009 95 5 365 372 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.011 19592323
10. The use of scintigraphy to detect increased osseous metabolic activity about the knee. S Dye MH Chew, J Bone Joint Surg 1993 75 1388 1406 (Pubitemid 23331237)
11. [Nuclear medical imaging in case of painful knee arthroplasty]. S Gratz H Hoffken JW Kaiser TM Behr H Strosche P Reize, Radiologe 2009 49 1 59 67 10.1007/s00117-008-1703-0 18597065
12. Is SPECT/CT with a hybrid camera useful to improve scintigraphic imaging interpretation? O Schillaci R Danieli C Manni G Simonetti, Nucl Med Commun 2004 25 7 705 710 10.1097/01.mnm.0000130240.83949.54 15208498 (Pubitemid 38901688)
13. SPECT/CT imaging in general orthopedic practice. S Scharf, Semin Nucl Med 2009 39 5 293 307 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.06.002 19646556
14. SPECT-CT compared with conventional imaging modalities for the assessment of the varus and valgus malaligned hindfoot. M Knupp GI Pagenstert A Barg L Bolliger ME Easley B Hintermann, J Orthop Res 2009 27 11 1461 6 10.1002/jor.20922 19472383
15. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. TK Fehring S Odum WL Griffin JB Mason M Nadaud, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 392 315 318 10.1097/00003086- 200111000-00041 11716402 (Pubitemid 33054961)
16. Significance of a "hot patella" in total knee replacement without primary patellar resurfacing. R Ahmad GS Kumar K Katam D Dunlop JL Pozo, Knee 2009 16 5 337 340 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.001 19254845
17. SPECT-CT imaging in degenerative joint disease of the foot and ankle. GI Pagenstert A Barg AG Leumann H Rasch J Muller-Brand B Hintermann V Valderrabano, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009 91 9 1191 1196 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22570 19721045
18. Evaluation of aseptic loosening of knee prostheses by quantitative bone scintigraphy. R Klett D Steiner S Laurich R Bauer J Kordelle, Nuklearmedizin 2008 47 4 163 166 18690376
19. Three-phase bone scan pattern in asymptomatic uncemented total knee arthroplasty. D Rubello D Caricasulo N Borsato F Chierichetti P Zanco G Ferlin, Eur J Nucl Med 1996 23 10 1400 1403 10.1007/BF01367598 8781147 (Pubitemid 26340595)
20. Quantitative scintigraphic evaluation of total knee arthroplasties: a feasibility study. GM Sacchetti F Ghisellini M Brambilla A De Consoli P Fornara E Rizzo M Rudoni E Inglese M Cannas, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996 325 181 189 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00021 8998872 (Pubitemid 26108445)
21. Limitations of quantitative radionuclide bone scanning in the evaluation of total knee replacement. H Verlooy J Victor L Renson A Vandecruys P Drent L Mortelmans M De Roo, Clin Nucl Med 1993 18 8 671 674 10.1097/00003072-199308000- 00010 8403699 (Pubitemid 23229601)
22. Radionuclide imaging of asymptomatic versus symptomatic total knee arthroplasties. SG Kantor R Schneider JN Insall MW Becker, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990 260 118 123 2225613 (Pubitemid 20381527)
23. Imaging of total knee arthroplasty. KR Math SF Zaidi C Petchprapa SF Harwin, Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006 10 1 47 63 10.1055/s-2006-934216 16514580
24. [Effect of rotation of the femoral and tibial components on patellofemoral malalignment in knee arthroplasty]. H Kienapfel HP Springorum A Ziegler KJ Klose C Georg P Griss, Orthopade 2003 32 4 312 318 10.1007/s00132-002-0441-7 12707695 (Pubitemid 36597197)
25. A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Victor D Van Doninck L Labey F Van Glabbeek P Parizel J Bellemans, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009 91 5 683 690 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21827 19407308
26. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. RL Barrack T Schrader AJ Bertot MW Wolfe L Myers, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 392 46 55 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00006 11716424 (Pubitemid 33054928)
27. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. RA Berger LS Crossett JJ Jacobs HE Rubash, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 356 144 153 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021 9917679 (Pubitemid 29019483)
28. [Significance of axial rotation alignment of components of knee prostheses]. J Romero T Stahelin T Wyss S Hofmann, Orthopade 2003 32 6 461 468 12819884 (Pubitemid 36829884)
29. A study of the effect of tibial tray rotation on a specific mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. EA Chowdhury ML Porter, J Arthroplasty 2005 20 6 793 797 10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.058 16139718