Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Clinical Interventions in Aging

Volumn 9, Issue , 2014, Pages 1241-1246

  Gao, Lei ^a   Hu, Xin ^a   Liu, Yu Qi ^a   Xue, Qiao ^a   Feng, Quan Zhou ^a  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Octogenarians; Percutaneous coronary intervention; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCYSTEINE; STREPTOKINASE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; BLOOD VESSEL COMPLIANCE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CAUSE OF DEATH; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMORBIDITY; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; FIBRINOLYSIS; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HEART FAILURE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART REINFARCTION; HEART VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART VENTRICLE REMODELING; HUMAN; LEFT VENTRICULAR DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NO REFLOW PHENOMENON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; REVIEW; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905497692     PISSN: 11769092     EISSN: 11781998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S62642     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR series on public health and aging. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(6):101-116.
2. Singh M, Mathew V, Garratt KN, et al. Effect of age on the outcome of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at the Mayo Clinic. Am J Med. 2000;108(3):187-192.
3. Newell MC, Henry JT, Henry TD, et al. Impact of age on treatment and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2011; 161(4):664-672.
4. Yang X, Zhao Y, Wu H, et al. The coexistence of comorbidities at admission is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of 5523 cases in China. Int J Cardiol. 2012;155(3):451-452.
5. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115(19): 2570-2589.
6. Wang YC, Hwang JJ, Hung CS, Kao HL, Chiang FT, Tseng CD. Outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105(6): 451-458.
7. Skelding KA, Mehta LS, Pica MC, et al. Primary percutaneous interventions for acute myocardial infarction in octogenarians: a single-center experience. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25(8):363-366.
8. Sosnowski C, Janeczko-Sosnowska E, Wozniak J, et al. Primary coronary intervention in diabetic octogenarians with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiol Pol. 2007;65(10):1181-1186.
9. Antonsen L, Jensen LO, Terkelsen CJ, et al. Outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians and nonagenarians with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: from the Western Denmark Heart Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81(6):912-919.
10. Oduncu V, Erkol A, Tanalp AC, et al. [Comparison of early and late clinical outcomes in patients >= 80 versus >80 years of age after successful primary angioplasty for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013;41(4): 319-328.
11. Claessen BE, Kikkert WJ, Engstrom AE, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in octogenarians: trends and outcomes. Heart. 2010;96(11):843-847.
12. Yamanaka F, Jeong MH, Saito S, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between octogenarians and non-octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction in the drug-eluting stent era: analysis of the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Cardiol. 2013;62(4): 210-216.
13. de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van 't Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(11): 1723-1728.
14. ClinicalTrials.gov. Senior PAMI: Primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. May 14, 2010. Available from: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov/ct2/show/NCT00136929. Accessed June 19, 2014.
15. TheHeart.Org. O'Riordan M. SENIOR PAMI: primary PCI not better than lytic therapy in elderly patients. May 14, 2010. Available from: www.theheart.org/article/581549.do. Accessed June 19, 2014.
16. Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M, et al. Primary angioplasty vs fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(1):51-60.
17. Goldenberg I, Matetzky S, Halkin A, et al. Primary angioplasty with routine stenting compared with thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2003;145(5): 862-867.
18. Mehta RH, Sadiq I, Goldberg RJ, et al. Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with that of thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2004;147(2):253-259.
19. Berger AK, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Thrombolytic therapy in older patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(2):366-374.
20. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):625-634.
21. Carro A, Kaski JC. Myocardial infarction in the elderly. Aging Dis. 2011; 2(2):116-137.
22. Dangas GD, Singh HS. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians: navigate with caution. Heart. 2010;96(11):813-814.
23. Inbar R, Shoenfeld Y. Elevated cardiac troponins: the ultimate marker for myocardial necrosis, but not without a differential diagnosis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(1):50-53.
24. Picarra BC, Santos AR, Celeiro M, et al. Non-cardiac comorbidities in the very elderly with acute myocardial infarction: prevalence and influence on management and in-hospital mortality. Rev Port Cardiol. 2011;30(4):379-392.
25. Renilla A, Barreiro M, Barriales V, Torres F, Alvarez P, Lambert JL. Management and risk factors for mortality in very elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(1): 146-151.
26. Zhao WS, Li KB, Zhang Y, Wang HS, Wang LF, Yang XC. [The in-hospital mortality and its determinants for very elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2011;50(12): 1023-1025.
27. Timoteo AT, Ramos R, Toste A, et al. [Impact of age on treatment and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction, particularly in very elderly patients]. Rev Port Cardiol. 2011;30(12):897-903. Portuguese.
28. Okmen E. [Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013;41(4):329-331. Turkish.
29. DeGeare VS, Stone GW, Grines L, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(1):30-34.
30. Moonen LA, vant Veer M, Pijls NH. Procedural and long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. Neth Heart J. 2010;18(3):129-134.
31. Sakai K, Nagayama S, Ihara K, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly aged >/=75 years. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79(1):50-56.
32. Tok D, Turak O, Ozcan F, et al. [Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in elderly aged 75 years and over: in-hospital mortality and clinical outcome]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2012;40(7):565-573. Turkish.
33. Wang TY, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention and drug-eluting stent use among patients >85 years of age in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2):105-112.
34. Page M, Doucet M, Eisenberg MJ, Behlouli H, Pilote L. Temporal trends in revascularization and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction among the very elderly. CMAJ. 2010;182(13):1415-1420.
35. Kinnaird T, Anderson R, Hill J, Thomas M. Bleeding during percutaneous intervention: tailoring the approach to minimise risk. Heart. 2009; 95(1):15-19.
36. Dodson JA, Wang Y, Chaudhry SI, Curtis JP. Bleeding-avoidance strategies and outcomes in patients 80 years of age with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the NCDR CathPCI Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(1):1-6.
37. Arzamendi D, Ly HQ, Tanguay JF, et al. Effect on bleeding, time to revascularization, and one-year clinical outcomes of the radial approach during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(2): 148-154.
38. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-1420.
39. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 127(4):e362-e425.
40. Lopes RD, Alexander KP, Manoukian SV, et al. Advanced age, antithrombotic strategy, and bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(12):1021-1030.
41. Sadat U. N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced acute kidney injury: clinical use against principles of evidence-based clinical medicine. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;12(1):1-3.
42. ACT Investigators. Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT). Circulation. 2011;124(11):1250-1259.
43. Erturk M, Uslu N, Gorgulu S, et al. Does intravenous or oral high-dose N-acetylcysteine in addition to saline prevent contrast-induced nephropathy assessed by cystatin C. Coron Artery Dis. 2014;25(2):111-117.
44. Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008;117(5):686-697.
45. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, et al. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(9):828-837.
46. Migliorini A, Moschi G, Valenti R, et al. Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;152(5):903-908.
47. Iwakura K, Ito H, Okamura A, et al. Nicorandil treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circ J. 2009;73(5): 925-931.
48. Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Bhatt DL. Role of adjunctive thrombectomy and embolic protection devices in acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(24):2989-3001.
49. Parodi G, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of manual thrombus aspiration with rheolytic thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):224-230.
50. Jolly SS, Bertrand OF. Another chapter in the story of thrombectomy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a story not yet finished. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(14):1024-1026.