Correction: A room with a viewpoint revisited: descriptive norms and hotel guests' towel reuse behavior (PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 8 (e104086) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104086);A room with a viewpoint revisited: Descriptive norms and hotel guests' towel reuse behavior

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Bohner, Gerd ^a   Schlüter, Lena E ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HOTEL INDUSTRY; HUMAN; HYGIENE PRODUCT; INDUSTRY; MALE; MORALITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PILOT STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; RECYCLING; TOWEL; BED; EMPORIATRICS; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BEDDING AND LINENS; EQUIPMENT REUSE; GERMANY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL VALUES; TRAVEL MEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905457259     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106606     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35: 472-482. doi:10.1086/586910
2. Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, Reno RR (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201-234. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
3. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB (2009) Normative influences on consumption and conservation behaviors. In: Wänke M, editor. Social psychology of consumer behavior. New York: Psychology Press. pp. 273-296.
4. Terry DJ, Hogg MA (1996) Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 776-793. doi:10.1177/0146167296228002
5. Bohner G, Pina A, Viki GT, Siebler F (2010) Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups. Psychology, Crime & Law 16: 671-693. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.492349
6. Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
7. Zell E, Alicke MD (2009) Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 467-482. doi:10.1037/a0015453
8. Darke PR, Chaiken S, Bohner G, Einwiller S, Erb H, et al. (1998) Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 1205-1215. doi:10.1177/01461672982411007
9. Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Science 31: 900-912. doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0727
10. McShane BB, Bradlow ET, Berger J (2012) Visual influence and social groups. Journal of Marketing Research 49: 854-871. doi:10.1509/jmr.11.0223
11. Schultz WP, Khazian AM, Zaleski AC (2008) Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence 3: 4-23. doi:10.1080/15534510701755614
12. Reese G, Loew K, Steffgen G (2014) A towel less: Social norms enhance proenvironmental behavior in hotels. The Journal of Social Psychology 154: 97-100. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.855623
13. Rosenthal R (1990) How are we doing in soft psychology?. American Psychologist 45: 775-777. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.775
14. Makel MC, Plucker JA, Hegarty B (2012) Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 537-542. doi:10.1177/1745691612460688
15. Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M (2012) Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 615-631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058
16. Brandt MJ (2013) Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104: 765-785. doi: 10.1037/a0031751
17. Burger JM (2009) Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today. American Psychologist 64: 1-11. doi: 10.1037/a0010932
18. Doyen S, Klein O, Pichon C, Cleeremans A (2012) Behavioral priming: it's all in the mind, but whose mind. PLoS ONE 7 (1): e29081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
19. Grau I, Bohner G (2014) Anchoring revisited: The role of the comparative question. PLoS ONE 9 (1): e86056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086056
20. Barreto M, Ellemers N (2000) You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 891-906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001
21. Garcia SM, Tor A (2009) The N-effect: More competitors, less competition. Psychological Science 20: 871-877. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02385.x
22. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Rosenthal E (2009) What makes Europe greener than the U.S.? Available: http://e360.yale.edu/feature/what-makes-europe-greener-than-the-us/2193/. Accessed 22 January 2014
24. World Bank (2014) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). Available: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC. Accessed 22 January 2014
25. Sedikides C, Gaertner L, Toguchi Y (2003) Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84: 60-79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514. 84.1.60 (Pubitemid 37177425)
26. Stroebe W, Strack F (2014) The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9: 59-71. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450
27. Erb H, Bohner G, Hewstone M, Werth L, Reinhard M (2006) Large minorities and small majorities: Interactive effects of inferred and explicit consensus on attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28: 221-231. doi:10.1207/ s15324834basp2803-2 (Pubitemid 44620897)
28. Bohner G, Moskowitz GB, Chaiken S (1995) The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology 6: 33-68. doi:10.1080/14792779443000003
29. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Goldman R (1981) Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 847-855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
30. Göckeritz S, Schultz PW, Rendón T, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, et al. (2010) Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology 14: 514-523. doi:10.1002/ejsp.643
31. Bohner G, Crow K, Erb H, Schwarz N (1992) Affect and persuasion: Mood effects on the processing of persuasive message content and context cues and on subsequent behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 22: 511-530. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220602