Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 671-693

  Bohner, Gerd ^a   Pina, Afroditi ^b   Viki, G Tendayi ^b   Siebler, Frank ^c  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Rape myths; Rape proclivity; Sexual aggression; Sexual violence; Social norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956551221     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: 14772744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2010.492349     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abbey, A., & McAuslan, P. (2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students' perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747-756.
2. Abrams, D., Viki, G.T.N., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Berkowitz, A.D. (2002). Fostering men's responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In P.A. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships (pp. 163-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Bohner, G. (1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen: Sozialpsychologische Untersuchungen ü ber tä terentlastende und opferfeindliche Ü berzeugungen im Bereich sexueller Gewalt [Rape myths: Social psychological studies on beliefs that exonerate the assailant and blame the victim of sexual violence]. Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
6. Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., Pina, A., Siebler, F., & Viki, G.T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective, and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In M.A.H. Horvath & J.M. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17-45). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
7. Bohner, G., Jarvis, C.I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819-828.
8. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
9. Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 286-297.
10. Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
11. Buss, D.M. & Malamuth, N. (Eds.) (1996). Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
13. Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
14. Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319-325.
15. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S., & Wood, W. (1981). An attribution analysis of persuasion. In J.H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 37-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Epps, K.J., Haworth, R., & Swaffer, T. (1993). Attitudes toward women and rape among male adolescents convicted of sexual versus nonsexual crimes. Journal of Psychology, 127, 501-506.
17. Eyssel, F., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2006). Perceived rape myth acceptance of others predicts rape proclivity: Social norm or judgmental anchoring? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 93-99.
18. Eyssel, F., Bohner, G., Süssenbach, P., & Schreiber, P. (2009). Neuentwicklung und alidierungeines szenariobasierten Verfahrens zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Aggression [New development and validation of a scenario-based measure of sexual aggression proclivity]. Diagnostica, 55, 117-127.
19. Fabiano, P.M., Perkins, H.W., Berkowitz, A., Linkenbach, J., & Stark, C. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52, 105-111.
20. Feild, H.S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 166-179.
21. Fonow, M.M., Richardson, L., & Wemmerus, V.A. (1992). Feminist rape education: Does it work? Gender and Society, 6, 108-121.
22. Foubert, J.D. (2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape prevention program on fraternity men's attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48, 158-163.
23. Foubert, J.D., & Marriott, K.A. (1997). Effects of a sexual assault peer education program on men's belief in rape myths. Sex Roles, 36, 259-268.
24. Foubert, J.D., & McEwen, M.K. (1998). An all-male rape prevention peer education program: Decreasing fraternity men's behavioral intent to rape. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 548-556.
25. Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English." Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422-440.
26. Goethals, G.R., & Darley, J.M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J.M. Suls & R.M. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes (pp. 259-278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
27. Goethals, G.R., & Darley, J.M. (1986). Social comparison theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In B. Mullen & G.R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 21-47). New York: Springer.
28. Green, S.K., Lightfoot, M.A., Bandy, C., & Buchanan, D.R. (1985). A general model of the attribution process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 159-179.
29. Jetten, J., & Spears, R. (2003). The divisive potential of differences and similarities: The role of intergroup distinctiveness in intergroup differentiation. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 203-241.
30. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862-879.
31. Kelley, H.H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
32. Kley, H., Gerger, H., Siebler, F., & Bohner, G. (2002, September). Deutsche Fassung der Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale [Geman adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale]. Poster presented at the 43rd 'Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie', Berlin, Germany, 22-26 September 2002.
33. Koralewski, M.A., & Conger, J.C. (1992). The assessment of social skills among sexually coercive college males. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 169-188.
34. Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher-education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
35. Krahé, B. (2009). Sexuelle Aggression und Opfererfahrung unter Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen: Prävalenz und Prädiktoren [Sexual aggression and victimization among adolescents and young adults: Prevalence and predictors]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 173-183.
36. Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
37. Loh, C., Gidycz, C.A., Lobo, T.R., & Luthra, R. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1325-1348.
38. Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
39. Lonsway, K.A., & Kothari, C. (2000). First year campus acquaintance rape education: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory intervention. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 220-232.
40. Malamuth, N.M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
41. Malamuth, N.M. (1989). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part two. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 324-354.
42. Malamuth, N.M. (1998). An evolutionary-based model integrating research on the characteristics of sexually coercive men. In J.G. Adair, D. Bélanger, & K.L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science. Vol. 1: Social, personal, and cultural aspects (pp. 151-184). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
43. Malamuth, N.M., & Check, J.V.P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299-320.
44. Marshall, W.L. (1999). Current status of North American assessment and treatment programs for sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 221-239.
45. O'Donohue, W., Yeater, E.A., & Fanetti, M. (2003). Rape prevention with college males: The roles of rape myth acceptance, victim empathy, and outcome expectancies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 513-531.
46. Overholser, J.C., & Beck, S. (1986). Multimethod assessment of rapists, child molesters, and three control groups on behavioral and psychological measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 682-687.
47. Park, B., & Judd, C.M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
48. Payne, D.L., Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
49. Pepitone, A. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 641-653.
50. Preacher, K.J., & Leonardelli, G.J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://people.ku.edu/-preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
51. Quackenbush, R.L. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed, and undifferentiated males on dimensions of attitudes toward rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 318-342.
52. Shaffer, L.S. (1983). Toward Pepitone's vision of a normative social psychology: What is a social norm? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 275-294.
53. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1981). Manipulating salience: Causal assessment in natural settings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 554-558.
54. Schwendinger, J.R., & Schwendinger, H. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18-26.
55. Seto, M.C., & Barbaree, H.E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1235-1248.
56. Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 159-163.
57. Sykes, G.M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
58. Temkin, J., & Krahé, B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford, UK: Hart.
59. Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
60. Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., & White, K.M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Selfidentity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225-244.
61. Tieger, T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 147-158.
62. Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K.A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between-subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 820-828.
63. Turner, J.C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
64. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
65. Wellen, J.M., Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (1998). Group norms and attitude-behavior consistency: The role of group salience and mood. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 48-56