Outcomes and limitations of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 441-447

  Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a   Rossanese, Marta ^b   Gnech, Michele ^b   Novara, Giacomo ^b   Mottrie, Alexandre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

functional outcomes; laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; nephron sparing surgery; oncologic outcomes; perioperative outcomes; renal cell carcinoma; robot assisted partial nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SOLITARY KIDNEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRON; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905385828     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000095     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2012; 62:1023-1033.
2. Froghi S, Ahmed K, Khan MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a). BJU Int 2013; 112:322-333.
3. Ficarra V, Minervini A, Antonelli A, et al. A multicenter matched-pair analysis comparing robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2013; 113:936-941.
4. Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Fiori C. Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics. BJU Int 2013; 112:1125-1132.
5. Nadu A, Goldberg H, Lubin M, Baniel J. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for totally intrarenal tumours. BJU Int 2013; 112:E82-E86.
6. Di Pierro GB, Tartaglia N, Aresu L, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for endophytichilar tumors: feasibility and outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:769-774.
7. George AK, Herati AS, Rais-Bahrami S, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 2014; 83:111-115.
8. George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, et al. Perioperative outcomes of offclamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2013; 111:E235-E241.
9. Salami SS, George AK, Rais-Bahrami S, et al. Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. J Endourol 2014; 28:191-195.
10. Shao P, Tang L, Li P, et al. Application of a vasculature model and standardization of the renal hilar approach in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for precise segmental artery clamping. Eur Urol 2013; 63:1072-1081.
11. Favaretto RL, Sanchez-Salas R, Benoist N, et al. Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: mid-term results. J Endourol 2013; 27:52-57.
12. Patel HD, Mullins JK, Pierorazio PM, et al. Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013; 189:1229-1235.
13. Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME, et al. Perioperative complications of robotassisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology 2013; 81:573-579.
14. Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S, et al. Positive surgical margins in robotassisted partial nephrectomy: a multiinstitutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 2013; 190:1674-1679.
15. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R, et al. Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 64:744-750.
16. Sandhu GS, Kim EH, Tanagho YS, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: off-clamp technique. J Endourol 2013; 27:4-7.
17. Kaczmarek BF, Tanagho YS, Hillyer SP, et al. Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multiinstitutional propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 2013; 64:988-993.
18. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Bensalah K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for tumors over 4 cm: operative results and preliminary oncologic outcomes from a multicentre French study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:799-803.
19. Eyraud R, Long JA, Snow-Lisy D, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes. Urology 2013; 81:1246-1251.
20. Volpe A, Garrou D, Amparore D, et al. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with high surgical complexity. BJU Int 2014. doi: 10.1111/bju.12751.
21. Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2012; 61:1257-1262.
22. Hillyer SP, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multiinstitutional analysis. Urology 2013; 81:93-97.
23. Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 2013; 20:484-491.
24. Abreu AL, Berger AK, Aron M, et al. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for single versus multiple renal tumors. J Urol 2013; 189:462-467.
25. Kumar RK, Sammon JD, Kaczmarek BF, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease: a multiinstitutional propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 2013; 65:1205-1210.
26. Autorino R, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, et al. Repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): feasibility and early outcomes. BJU Int 2013; 111:767-772.
27. Zhang X, Shen Z, Zhong S, et al. Comparison of peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2013; 112:1133-1142.
28. Ficarra V, Novara G, Volpe A, Mottrie A. Robot-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the time for meta-analysis has not yet arrived. BJU Int 2013; 112:E334-E336.
29. Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, et al. A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int 2013; 111:256-263.
30. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, et al. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 2013; 189:1236-1242.
31. Springer C, Hoda MR, Fajkovic H, et al. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients. BJU Int 2013; 111:281-288.
32. Mellon MJ, Lucas SM, Kum JB, et al. A comparison of pathologic outcomes of matched robotic and open partial nephrectomies. Int Urol Nephrol 2013; 45:381-385.