A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: Results from a French multicentre collaborative study

BJU International

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 256-263

  Masson Lecomte, Alexandra ^a,b   Bensalah, Karim ^c,d   Seringe, Elise ^a,b   Vaessen, Christophe ^a,b   De La Taille, Alexandre ^a,e   Doumerc, Nicolas ^f,g   Rischmann, Pascal ^f,g   Bruyère, Franck ^h,i   Soustelle, Laurent ^j,k   Droupy, Stéphane ^j,k   Rouprêt, Morgan ^a,b  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c REIMS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Université de Reims Champagnes Ardenne   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^f CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^h CHU BRETONNEAU   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^j DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

^k UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

more..

Author keywords

laparoscopy; nephron sparing surgery; recurrence; renal cell carcinoma; robotics; small renal mass; tumour diameter

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; HEMOSTATIC AGENT; OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE;

ADULT; AGE; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY SCORE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORING SYSTEM; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CREATININE; FEMALE; FRANCE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATIVE TIME; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; WARM ISCHEMIA;

EID: 84873184804     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11528.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cooperberg MR, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Villalta JD, Carroll PR, Kane CJ,. Decreasing size at diagnosis of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma: analysis from the National Cancer Data Base, 1993 to 2004. J Urol 2008; 179: 2131-2135
2. Nguyen MM, Gill IS, Ellison LM,. The evolving presentation of renal carcinoma in the United States: trends from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. J Urol 2006; 176: 2397-2400
3. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 543-552
4. Sun M, Trinh QD, Bianchi M, et al. A non-cancer-related survival benefit is associated with partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 725-731
5. Thiruchelvam PT, Willicombe M, Hakim N, Taube D, Papalois V,. Renal transplantation. BMJ 2011; 343: d7300
6. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 41-46
7. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 340-345
8. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009; 182: 866-872
9. Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754-758
10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG,. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844-853
11. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137-147
12. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V, et al. A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2011; [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.08.004
13. Crepel M, Bernhard JC, Bellec L, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a French multicentre experience. Prog Urol 2007; 17: 45-49
14. Lebeau T, Roupret M, Ferhi K, et al. Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 536-542
15. Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 341-349
16. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 398-406
17. Lane BR, Gill IS,. 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2010; 183: 473-479
18. Yates DR, Rouprêt M, Bitker MO, Vaessen C,. To infinity and beyond: the robotic toy story. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 263-265
19. Kaouk JH, Hillyer SP, Autorino R, et al. 252 robotic partial nephrectomies: evolving renorrhaphy technique and surgical outcomes at a single institution. Urology 2011; 78: 1338-1344
20. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 815-820
21. Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 1257-1262
22. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 466-471
23. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008; 179: 2158-2163
24. Moreno Sierra J, Fernandez Perez C, Ortiz Oshiro E, et al. Key areas in the learning curve for robotic urological surgery: a Spanish multicentre survey. Urol Int 2011; 87: 64-69
25. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V,. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 127-132