Synthesis, characterization, permeation and antibacterial properties of cellulose acetate/polyethylene glycol membranes modified with chitosan

Desalination

Volumn 351, Issue , 2014, Pages 59-69

  Waheed, Sidra ^a   Ahmad, Adnan ^a   Khan, Shahzad Maqsood ^a   Gul, Sabad e ^a   Jamil, Tahir ^a   Islam, Atif ^a   Hussain, Tousif ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB   (Pakistan)

^b GC UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Antibacterial; Cellulose acetate; Chitosan; Phase inversion; Polyethylene glycol; Reverse osmosis

Indexed keywords

ALIPHATIC COMPOUNDS; CELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MORPHOLOGY; PERMEATION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENES; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STREAM FLOW; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ANTI-BACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIBACTERIAL; ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES; CELLULOSE ACETATE MEMBRANE; CELLULOSE ACETATES; COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS; PHASE INVERSION; REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANTS;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

ANTIBIOTICS; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; CELLULOSE; MEMBRANE; POLYMER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84905378640     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Shiklomanov I.A. Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int. 2009, 25:11-32.
2. Falkenmark M. Growing water scarcity in agriculture: future challenge to global water security. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2013, 371.
3. Ball P. Seeking the solution. Nature 2005, 436.
4. Gleick P.H. Water in crisis: paths to sustainable water use. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8:571-579.
5. Johnsona N., Ravnborgb H.M., Westermanna O., Probst K. User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy 2001, 3:507-520.
6. Dudgeon D., Arthington A.H., Gessner M.O., Kawabata Z., Knowler D.J., Leveque C., Naiman R.J., Richard A., Soto D., Stiassny M., Sullivan C.A. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81:163-182.
7. Postel S.L. Water for food production: will there be enough in 2025?. Bioscience 1998, 48:629-637.
8. Hoepner T., Lattemann S. Chemical impacts from seawater desalination plants- a case study of northern red sea. Desalination 2002, 152:130-140.
9. Hoepner T., Windelberg J. Elements of environmental impact studies on coastal desalination plants. Desalination 1996, 108:11-18.
10. Gude V.G., Nirmalakhandan N. Desalination using low-grade heat sources. J. Energy Eng. 2008, 134:95-101.
11. Karagiannis I.C., Soldatos P.G. Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment. Desalination 2008, 223:448-456.
12. Kalogirou S.A. Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources. Prog. Energy Combust. 2005, 31:242-281.
13. Idris A., Yet L.K. The effect of different molecular weight PEG additives on cellulose acetate asymmetric dialysis membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:920-927.
14. Charcosset C. A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination. Desalination 2009, 245:214-231.
15. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim R. Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment - a review. Desalination 2006, 194:211-231.
16. Lang W., Shen J., Zhang Y., Yu Y., Guo Y., Liu C. Preparation and characterizations of charged poly(vinylbutyral) hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes with perfluorosulfonic acid as additive. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 430:1-10.
17. Buonomenna M.G. Nano-enhanced reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2013, 314:73-88.
18. Caneba G.T., Soong D.S. Polymer membrane formation through the thermal-inversion process. 1. Experimental study of membrane structure formation. Macromolecules 1985, 18:2538-2545.
19. Membrane preparation/phase inversion membranes 2000, Netherlands, Academic Press. M. Muller (Ed.).
20. Li D., Krantz W., Greenberg A.R., Sani R.L. Membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS): model development and validation. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 276:50-60.
21. Arya R.K. Drying induced phase separation in multicomponent polymeric coatings - simulation study. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2012, 1:48-52.
22. Rustemeyer P. History of CA and evolution of the markets. Macromol. Symp. 2004, 208:1-6.
23. Fischer S., Thummler K., Volkert B., Hettrich K., Schmidt I., Fischer K. Properties and applications of cellulose acetate. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 262:89-96.
24. Saeki D., Nagao S., Sawada I., Ohmukai Y., Maruyama T., Matsuyama H. Development of antibacterial polyamide reverse osmosis membrane modified with a covalently immobilized enzyme. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428:403-409.
25. Hassanien A.M., El-Hashash M.A., Mekewi M.A., Guirguis D.B., Ramadan A.M. Fabrication of polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose acetate (PVA/CA/PEG) antibacterial membrane for potential water purification application. Hydrol. Curr. Res. 2013, 4.
26. Ashraf M.A., Maah M.J., Qureshi A.K., Gharibreza M., Yusoff I. Synthetic polymer composite membrane for the desalination of saline water. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:3650-3661.
27. Islam A., Yasin T., Rehman I. Synthesis of hybrid polymer networks of irradiated chitosan/poly(vinylalcohol) for biomedical applications. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014, 96:115-119.
28. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L., Jay J. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341-1362.
29. Smolders C.A., Smolders A.J. Formation of membranes by means of immersion precipitation. Part II. The mechanism of formation of membranes prepared from the system cellulose acetate-acetone-water. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 34:67-86.
30. Eckelt J., Loske S., Gonçalves M.C., Wolf B.A. Formation of micro- and nano-spheric particles (filter dust) during the preparation of cellulose acetate membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 212:69-74.
31. Li J., Nagai K., Nakacawa T., Wang S. Preparation of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) and cellulose acetate (CA) blend membranes and their gas permeabiIities. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 58:1455-1463.
32. Li J., Nagai K., Wang S., Nagai K., Nakagawa T., Mau A. Effect of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) on gas permeabilities and permselectivities in its cellulose acetate (CA) blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 138:143-152.
33. Gizli N. Morphological characterization of cellulose acetate based reverse osmosis membranes by atomic microscopy (AFM) effect of evaporation time. Chem. Chem. Technol. 2011, 5:327-333.
34. Stamatialis D.F., Dias C.R., Pinho M.N. Atomic force microscopy of dense and asymmetric cellulose-based membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 160:235-242.
35. Singh S., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T., Ramamurthy P. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142:111-127.
36. Saljoughi E., Sadrzadeh M., Mohammadi T. Effect of preparation variables on morphology and pure water permeation flux through asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:627-634.
37. Arthanareeswaran G., Devi T.K.S., Raajenthiren M. Effect of silica particles on cellulose acetate blend ultrafiltration membranes: part I. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 64:38-47.
38. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:2388-2394.
39. Arthanareeswaran G., Devi T.K.S., Mohan D. Development, characterization and separation performance of organic-inorganic membranes: part II. Effect of additives. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 67:271-281.
40. Chou W., Yu D., Yang M. The preparation and characterization of silver-loading cellulose acetate hollow fiber membrane for water treatment. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2005, 16:600-607.
41. Cappuccino J.G., Sherman N. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual 1998, Cummings Science Publishing, California.
42. Zafar M., Ali M., Khan S.M., Jamil T., Butt M.T.Z. Effect of additives on the properties and performance of cellulose acetate derivative membranes in the separation of isopropanol/water mixtures. Desalination 2012, 285:359-365.
43. Liu C., Bai R. Preparation of chitosan/cellulose acetate blend hollow fibers for adsorptive performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 267:68-77.
44. Ali M., Zafar M., Jamil T., Butt M.T.Z. Influence of glycol additives on the structure and performance of cellulose acetate/zinc oxide blend membranes. Desalination 2011, 270:98-104.
45. Matsuyama H., Ohga K., Maki T., Tearamoto M., Nakatsuka S. Porous cellulose acetate membrane prepared by thermally induced phase separation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89:3951-3955.
46. Wenjun L., Youxin Y., Cabbasso Formation and microstructure of polyethylene microporous membrane through thermaly induced phase separation. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 1995, 13:7-19.
47. Zeng Y., Wang Z., Wan L., Shi Y., Chen G., Bai C. Surface morphology and nodule formation mechanism of cellulose acetate membranes by atomic force microscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88:1328-1335.
48. Khulbe K.C., Feng C.Y., Matsuura T. Synthetic Polymeric Membranes: Characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy 2007, Springer.
49. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:115-118.
50. Mazid M.A. Mechanisms of transport through reverse osmosis membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1984, 19:357-373.
51. Burghoff H.G., Lee K.L., Pusch W. Characterization of transport across cellulose acetate membranes in the presence of strong solute-membrane interactions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1980, 25:323-347.
52. Malaisamy R., Mahendran R., Mohan D., Rajendran M., Mohan V. Cellulose acetate and sulfonated polysulfone blend ultrafiltration membranes. I. Preparation and characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86:1749-1761.
53. Chakrabarty B., Ghoshal A.K., Purkait M.K. Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport propertie. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309:209-221.
54. Arthanareeswaran G., Mohan D., Raajenthiren M. Preparation, characterization and performance studies of ultrafiltration membranes with polymeric Additives. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 350:130-138.
55. Bai H., Zhou Y., Wang X., Zhang L. The permeability and mechanical properties of cellulose acetate membranes blended with polyethylene glycol 600 for treatment of municipal sewage, Prece. Environ. Sci. 2012, 16:346-351.
56. Arthanareeswaran G., Thanikaivelan P., Srinivasn K., Mohan D., Rajendran M. Synthesis, characterization and thermal studies on cellulose acetate membranes with additive. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40:2153-2159.
57. Theresa M., Pendergast M., Hoek E.M.V. A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4:1946-1971.
58. Yang T., Zall R.R. Chitosan membranes for reverse osmosis application. J. Food Sci. 1984, 49:91-93.
59. Li Q., Mahendra S., Lyon D.Y., Brunet L., Liga M.V., Li D., Alvarez P.J.J. Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: Potential applications and implications. Water Res. 2008, 42:4591-4602.