Net earthquake hazard and elements at risk (NEaR) map creation for city of Istanbul via spatial multi-criteria decision analysis

Natural Hazards

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 685-709

  Karaman, Himmet ^a   Erden, Turan ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP; Attenuation relations; Earthquake hazard map; GIS; Multi criteria decision analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; GIS; GROUND MOTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MAPPING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; SEISMIC HAZARD;

ISTANBUL [ISTANBUL (PRV)]; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84905364397     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1099-2     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abella EAC, Westen CJ (2007) Generation of a landslide risk index map for Cuba using spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Landslides 4(4): 311-325.
2. Alexander DE (1993) Natural disasters. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Ambraseys NN (1995) The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct 24(4): 467-490.
4. Ambraseys NN, Bommer JJ (1991) The attenuation of ground accelerations in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct 20(12): 1179-1202.
5. Anbazhagan P, Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK, Narendara Kumar JN, Sitharam TG (2010) Multi-criteria seismic hazard evaluation for Bangalore city, India. J Asian Earth Sci 38(5): 186-198.
6. Ansal A, Akinci A, Cultrera G, Erdik M, Pessina V, Tönük G, Ameri G (2009) Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(4): 699-709. doi: 10. 1016/j. soildyn. 2008. 07. 006.
7. Assimaki D, Kausel E, Gazetas G (2005) Soil-dependent topographic effects: a case study from the 1999 Athens earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21(4): 929-966. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2068135.
8. Banai-Kashani R (1989) A new method for site suitability analysis: the analytic hierarchy process. Environ Manag 13(6): 685-693. doi: 10. 1007/bf01868308.
9. Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson NA (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2): 377-389. doi: 10. 1785/0120040073.
10. Boore DM (1972) A note on the effect of simple topography on seismic SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(1): 275-284.
11. Boore DM (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work (vol 68, pg 128, 1997). Seismol Res Lett 68(3): 128-153.
12. Boore DM (2004) Can site response be predicted. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(Special Issue 1): 1-41.
13. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2007) Boore-Atkinson NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters (trans: Engineering Co, University of California B). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
14. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0. 01 s and 10. 0 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1): 99. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2830434.
15. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(2): 327-341.
16. Bouchon M (1973) Effect of topography on the surface motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 615(3): 615-632.
17. Bouchon M, Schultz CA, Toksöz MN (1996) Effect of three-dimensional topography on seismic motion. J Geophys Res 101(B3): 5835-5846.
18. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2007) Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Pacific Earthquake Engineering.
19. Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multicriteria evaluation with geographical information-systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5(3): 321-339.
20. Çelebi M (1991) Topographical and geological amplification: case studies and engineering implications. Struct Saf 10: 199-217.
21. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. Comité Européen de Normalisation.
22. Cheng EWL, Li H (2001) Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Inf Manag Comput Secur 9(2): 61-70.
23. Davies M (2001) Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions. Eur J Market 35(7/8): 872-893.
24. DEE-KOERI (2003) Earthquake risk assessment for the Istanbul metropolitan area (trans: Engineering E). Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul.
25. Douglas J (2004) Ground motion estimation equations 1964-2003: reissue of ESEE Report No. 01-1: 'A comprehensive worldwide summary of strong-motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969 to 2000)' with corrections and additions (trans: Mechanics DoCEES). Imperial College London, London.
26. Douglas J, Akkar S, Ameri G, Bard P-Y, Bindi D, Bommer J, Bora S, Cotton F, Derras B, Hermkes M, Kuehn N, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F, Riggelsen C, Sandi{dotless}kkaya MA, Scherbaum F, Stafford P, Traversa P (2013) Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 1-18. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-013-9522-8.
27. Elnashai AS, Di Sarno L (2008) Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. Wiley, Chichester.
28. Erden T (2012) Disaster and emergency management activities by geospatial tools with special reference to Turkey. Disaster Adv 5(1): 29-36.
29. Erden T, Coskun MZ (2010) Multi-criteria site selection for fire services: the interaction with analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 10(10): 2127-2134. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-10-2127-2010.
30. Erden T, Karaman H (2012) Analysis of earthquake parameters to generate hazard maps by integrating AHP and GIS for Küçükçekmece region. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(2): 475-483. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-12-475-2012.
31. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Resource Center. Esri. com. http://help. arcgis. com/en/arcgisdesktop/10. 0/help/index. html#/Classifying_numerical_fields_for_graduated_symbology/00s50000001r000000/. Accessed May 5, 2011.
32. Ganapathy GP (2011) First level seismic microzonation map of Chennai city-a GIS approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(2): 549-559.
33. Giardini D, Gruenthal G, Shedlock K, Zhang P (2003) GSHAP global seismic hazard map. In: William HK, Lee HKPCJ, Carl K (eds) International geophysics, vol 81, Part B. Academic Press, New York, pp 1233-1239. doi: 10. 1016/S0074-6142(03)80188-2.
34. Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (2005) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, New York.
35. Godinho L, Amado Mendes P, Tadeu A, Cadena-Isaza A, Smerzini C, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Madec R, Komatitsch D (2009) Numerical simulation of ground rotations along 2D topographical profiles under the incidence of elastic plane waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B): 1147-1161. doi: 10. 1785/0120080096.
36. Golden BL, Harker PT, Alexander JM, Wasil EA (1989) The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies. Springer, New York.
37. HAZTURK (2007) Developing a loss estimation program, HAZTURK based on HAZUS (hazards us) to be used before, during and after a disaster: a case study for Istanbul. TUBITAK, Ankara.
38. Ince G (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the historical peninsula of Istanbul. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(11): 3483-3493.
39. Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of 3rd international earthquake microzonation conference, Seattle, Washington, pp 1319-1330.
40. Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information-systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(3): 251-273.
41. JICA, IMM (2002) The study on a disaster prevention/mitigation basic plan in Istanbul including seismic microzonation in the republic of Turkey. Final report to T. C. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality. Pacific Consultants International, OYO Corporation, Istanbul.
42. Kamp U, Growley B, Khattak G, Owen L (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101(4): 631-642.
43. Karaman H, Sahin M, Elnashai AS (2008a) Earthquake loss assessment features of Maeviz-Istanbul (Hazturk). J Earthq Eng 12: 175-186. doi: 10. 1080/13632460802014006.
44. Karaman H, Sahin M, Elnashai AS, Pineda O (2008b) Loss assessment study for the Zeytinburnu district of Istanbul using Maeviz-Istanbul (HAZTURK). J Earthq Eng 12: 187-198. doi: 10. 1080/13632460802014030.
45. Kayen RE, Mitchell JK, Seed R, Lodge A, Nishio S, Coutinho R (1992) Evaluation of SPT-, CPT-, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data. Technical report NCEER, vol 1.
46. Kim SC, Min KJ (2004) Determining multi-criteria priorities in the planning of electric power generation: the development of an analytic hierarchy process for using the opinions of experts. Int J Manag 21(2): 186-193.
47. Komatitsch D, Vilotte J-P, Vai R, Castillo-Covarrubias JM, Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1999) The spectral element method for elastic wave equations-application to 2-D and 3-D seismic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45: 1139-1164.
48. Ladas I, Fountoulis I, Mariolakos I (2007) Using GIS & multicriteria decision analysis in landslide susceptibility mapping-a case study in Messinia Prefecture Area (SW Ploponnesus, Greece). Bull Geol Soc Greece 40(4): 1973-1985.
49. Lay T, Wallace TC (1995) Modern global seismology. International geophysics series, vol 58. Academic Press, San Diego.
50. Le Brun B, Hatzfeld D, Bard PY, Bouchon M (1999) Experimental study of the ground motion on a large scale topographic hill at Kitherion (Greece). J Seismol 3: 1-15.
51. Lee WHK (2002) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, vol Part B. International geophysics series, vol 81. Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston.
52. Lin W-T (2008) Earthquake-induced landslide hazard monitoring and assessment using SOM and PROMETHEE techniques: a case study at the Chiufenershan area in Central Taiwan. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(9): 995-1012.
53. Luna R, Frost JD (1998) Spatial liquefaction analysis system. J Comput Civil Eng 12(1): 48-56.
54. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York.
55. Millet I, Wedley WC (2002) Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 11(2): 97-107.
56. Min H (1994) Location analysis of international consolidation terminals using the analytic hierarchy process. J Bus Logist 15(2): 25-44.
57. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (U. S.), United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Geological Survey (U. S.) (2004) 2003 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures and accompanying commentary and maps.
58. OYO IC (2007) Microzonation Maps and Reports (South Section of European Side). Final Report to Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, vol 1. T. C. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul.
59. OYO IC (2009) Production of Microzonation Report and Maps on Asian Side. Final report to Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, vol 2. T. C. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul.
60. Pal I, Nath SK, Shukla K, Pal DK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Bansal BK (2007) Earthquake hazard zonation of Sikkim Himalaya using a GIS platform. Nat Hazards 45(3): 333-377.
61. Paolucci R (2002) Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities. Earthq Eng Struct 31: 1831-1853. doi: 10. 1002/eqe. 192.
62. Parsons T (2004) Recalculated probability of M ≥ 7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. North 109: 1-21. doi: 10. 1029/2003jb002667.
63. Pedersen H, Le Brun B, Hatzfeld D, Campillo M, Bard PY (1994) Ground-motion amplitude across ridges. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(6): 1786-1800.
64. Pulido N, Ojeda A, Atakan K, Kubo T (2004) Strong ground motion estimation in the Sea of Marmara region (Turkey) based on a scenario earthquake. Tectonophysics 391(1-4): 357-374. doi: 10. 1016/j. tecto. 2004. 07. 023.
65. Ramanathan R (2001) A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manage 63(1): 27-35.
66. Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3): 442-459. doi: 10. 1139/t98-017.
67. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, setting priorities, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, London.
68. Saaty TL, France JW, Valentine KR (1991) Modeling the graduate business school admissions process. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 25(2): 155-162.
69. Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1983) Diffraction of elastic waves by three-dimensional surface irregularities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6): 1621-1636.
70. Sato T, Kasahara J, Taymaz T, Ito M, Kamimura A, Hayakawa T, Tan O (2004) A study of microearthquake seismicity and focal mechanisms within the Sea of Marmara (NW Turkey) using ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs). Tectonophysics 391(1-4): 303-314. doi: 10. 1016/j. tecto. 2004. 07. 018.
71. Schoppmeyer J (1978) Die Wahrnehmung von Rastern und die Abstufung von Tonwertskalen in der Kartographie. Dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Bonn.
72. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97(9): 1249-1273.
73. Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1996) What is a reference site? Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6): 1733-1748.
74. Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1997) Erratum for what is a reference site? Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 516.
75. Stein S, Wysession M (2003) An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
76. Toprak S, Holzer TL (2003) Liquefaction potential index: field assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron 129(4): 315-322. doi: 10. 1061/(Asce)1090-0241(2003)129: 4(315.
77. Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2009) Landslide hazard zonation using quantitative methods in GIS. Int J Civil Eng 7(3): 176-189.
78. Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1): 1-29.
79. Varnes DJ, Landslides IAoEGCo, Slopes OMMo (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice, vol. 19. Unesco.