Reconceiving gender for an "excellent" future in public relations scholarship

The Future of Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management: Challenges for the Next Generation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 399-411

  Aldoory, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905308800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613967     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Aldoory, L. (1998). The language of leadership for women in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 73-101.
2. Aldoory, L. (2001a). Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement and the situational theory of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 163-185.
3. Aldoory, L. (2001b). The standard white woman in public relations. In E. L. Toth & L. Aldoory (Eds.), The gender challenge to media: Diverse voices from the field (pp. 105-149). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
4. Aldoory, L. (2003). The empowerment of feminist scholarship in public relations and the building of a feminist paradigm. Communication Yearbook, 27, 221-255.
5. Aldoory, L. (2005). A (re)conceived feminist paradigm for public relations: A case for substantial improvement. Journal of Communication, 55, 668-684.
6. Aldoory, L., & Toth, E. L. (2002). Gender discrepancies in a gendered profession: A developing theory for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 103-126.
7. Aldoory, L., & Toth, E. L. (2004). Leadership and gender in public relations: Perceived effectiveness of transformational and transactional leadership styles. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 157-184.
8. Baker Miller, J. (1992). Women and power. In T. E. Wartenburg (Ed.), Rethinking power (pp. 240-248). Albany: State University of New York.
9. Buzzanell, P. M. (1997). Toward an emotion-based feminist framework for research on dual career couples. Women and Language, 20(2), 40-48.
10. Buzzanell, P. M. (Ed.). (2000). Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Choi, Y., & Hon, L. C. (2002). The influence of gender composition in powerful positions on public relations practitioners' gender-related perceptions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 229-264.
12. Cline, C. G., Toth, E. L., Turk, J. V, Walters, L. M., Johnson, N., & Smith, H. (1986). The velvet ghetto: The impact of the increasing percentage of women in public relations and business communication. San Francisco: IABC Foundation.
13. Creedon, P. J. (1989). Public relations history misses "her story." Journalism Educator, 44, 26-30.
14. Creedon, P. J. (1991). Public relations and "women's work": Toward a feminist analysis of public relations roles. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 67-84.
15. Creedon, P J. (1993). Acknowledging the infrasystem: A critical feminist analysis of systems theory. Public Relations Review, 19, 15 7-166.
16. DeRosa, D., & Wilcox, D. L. (1989). Gaps are narrowing between female and male students. Public Relations Review, 15, 80-89.
17. Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1995). Manager's guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Engstrom, E. (2000). Looking through a gendered lens: Local U.S. television news anchors' perceived career barriers. Journal ofBroadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 614-635.
19. Engstrom, E., & Ferri, A. J. (1998). From barriers to challenges: Career perceptions of women TV news anchors. Journalism andMass Communication Quarterly, 75, 789-802.
20. Farley-Lucas, B. S. (2000). Communicating the (in)visibility of motherhood: Family talk and the ties to motherhood with/in the workplace. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(3/4). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://wwwcios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400.htm
21. Farmer, B., & Waugh, L. (1999). Gender differences in public relations students' career attitudes: A benchmark study. Public Relations Review, 25, 235-237.
22. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
23. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Trans. & Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
24. Golden, A. (2000). What we talk about when we talk about work and family: A discourse analysis of parental accounts. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10, 3/4, n.p. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400htm
25. Golden, A. (2001). Modernity and the communicative management of multiple roles: The case of the worker-parent. The Journal of Family Communication, 1, 233-264.
26. Golden, A. (2002). Speaking of work and family: Spousal collaboration on defining role-identities and developing shared meanings. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 122-141.
27. Grimes, D. S. (2002). Challenging the status quo? Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 381-410.
28. Grunig, J. E. (Ed.). (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Grunig, L. A. (1988). A research agenda for women in public relations. Public Relations Review, 14, 48-5 7.
30. Grunig, L. A. (1989). Sex discrimination in promotion and tenure injournalism education. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 93-100, 229.
31. Grunig, L. A. (1991). Court-ordered relief from sex discrimination in the foreign service: Implications for women working in development communication. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 85-113.
32. Grunig, L. A. (1993). The "glass ceiling" effect on mass communications students. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication (2nd ed., pp. 276-300). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Grunig, L. A. (2000). A feminist phase analysis of research on women in postmodern public relations. In D. Moss, D. Vercic, & G. Warnaby (Eds.), Perspectives on public relations research. London: Routledge.
34. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Grunig, L. A., Toth, E. L., & Hon, L. C. (2000). Feminist values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 49-68.
36. Grunig, L. A., Toth, E. L., & Hon, L. C. (2001). Women in public relations. New York: Guilford.
37. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575-599.
38. Henry, S. (1995). Dissonant notes of a retiring feminist: Doris E. Fleishman's later years. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 1-33.
39. Hon, L. C. (1995). Toward a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 27-88.
40. Hon, L. C., Grunig, L. A., & Dozier, D. M. (1992). Women in public relations: Problems and opportunities. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence inpublic relations and communication management (pp. 419-438). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Jorgenson, J. (2000). In terpreting the intersections of work and family: Frame conflicts in women's work. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(3/4), n.p. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://cios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400.htm
42. Kern-Foxworth, M. (1989a). An assessment of minority female roles and status in public relations: Trying to unlock the acrylic vault and assimilate into the velvet ghetto. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 241-286). San Francisco, CA: IABC Foundation.
43. Kern-Foxworth, M. (1989b). Status and roles of minority public relations practitioners. Public Relations Review, 5, 14-22.
44. Kern-Foxworth, M., Gandy, O., Hines, B., & Miller, D. A. (1994). Assessing the managerial roles of black female public relations practitioners using individual and organizational discriminants. Journal of Black Studies, 24(4), 416-434.
45. Kirby, E. L. (2000). Should I do as you say, or do as you do?: Mixed messages about work and family. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10, 3/4, n.p. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400.htm
46. Kirby, E. L., Golden, A. G., Medved, C. E., Jorgenson, J., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2003). An organizational communication challenge to the discourse of work and family research: From problematics to empowerment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 1-43.
47. Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). "The policy exists but you can't really use it": Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
48. Lamme, M. O. (2001). Furious desires and victorious careers: Doris E. Fleischman, counsel on public relations and advocate for working women. American Journalism, 18, 13-33.
49. Lauzen, M. (1992). Effects of gender on professional encroachment in public relations. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 173-180.
50. Lesly, P. (1988). Public relations numbers are up but stature down. Public Relations Review, 14, 3-7.
51. Mallia, K. L., & Ferris, S. P (2000). Telework: A consideration of its impact on individuals and organizations. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10, 3/4, n.p. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400.htm
52. Molleda, J. C., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Public relations roles in Brazil: Hierarchy eclipses gender differences. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 327-352.
53. Mumby, D. K. (2001). Power and politics. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods (pp. 585-623). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. O'Neil, J. (2003). An analysis of the relationships among structure, influence, and gender: Helping to build a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 151-179.
55. Rakow, L. F. (1989). From the feminization of public relations to the promise of feminism. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 287-298). San Francisco: IABC Foundation.
56. Rakow, L. F. (1992). The field reconsidered. In L. F. Rakow (Ed.), Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication (pp. 3-17). New York: Routledge.
57. Scrimger, J. (1989). Women communicators in Canada: A case for optimism. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 219-240). San Francisco: IABC Foundation.
58. Serini, S.A., Toth, E., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. (1996). Watchfor falling glass. .. women, men and job satisfaction in public relations: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9, 99-118.
59. Serini, S.A., Toth, E., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. (1998). Power, gender, and public relations: Sexual harassment as a threat to the practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 193-218.
60. Sha, B. L. (1996, May). Does feminization of the field make public relations more ethical? Paper presented to the In ternational Communication Association, Chicago.
61. Sha, B. L., & Toth, E. L. (2004). Future professionals' perceptions of work, life, and gender issues in public relations. Public Relations Review, 31, 93-100.
62. Slater, M. D., Chipman, H., Auld, G., Keefe, T., & Kendall, P. (1992). In formation processing and situational theory: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 189-203.
63. Tam, S. Y., Dozier, D. M., Lauzen, M. M., & Real, M. R. (1995). The impact of superior-subordinate gender on the career advancement of public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 259-272.
64. Toth, E. L. (1988). Making peace with gender issues in public relations. PublicRe-lations Review, 14, 36-47.
65. Toth, E. L. (1989). Whose freedom and equity in public relations? The gender balance argument. Mass Comm Review, 16, 70-76.
66. Toth, E. L. (2001). How feminist theory advanced the practice of public relations. In R. L. Heath & G. Vasquez (Eds.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 237-246). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. Toth, E. L., & Cline, C. G. (Eds.). (1989). Beyond the velvet ghetto. San Francisco: IABC Foundation.
68. Toth, E. L., & Cline, C. G. (1991). Public relations practitioner attitudes toward gender issues: A benchmark study. Public Relations Review, 17, 161-174.
69. Toth, E. L., & Grunig, L. A. (1993). The missing story of women in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5, 153-175.
70. Toth, E. L., Serini, S.A., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. G. (1998). Trends in publicrela-tions roles: 1990-1995. Public Relations Review, 24, 145-163.
71. van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Wood, J. T. (2001). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (4th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
73. Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., Sallot, L., & Cameron, G. T. (1996). Justice and gender: An instrumental and symbolic explication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 107-121.
74. Wright, D. K., Grunig, L. A., Springston, J. K., & Toth, E. L. (1991). Under the glass ceiling: An analysis of gender issues in American public relations. New York: PRSA Foundation.
75. Wrigley, B. J. (2002). Glass ceiling? What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how women view the glass ceiling in public relations and communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 27-55.
76. Zerbinos, E., & Clanton, G. A. (1993). Minority practitioners: Career influences, job satisfaction, and discrimination. Public Relations Review, 19, 75-91.