Approaches to discourse in dementia

Approaches to Discourse in Dementia

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-299

  Guendouzi, Jacqueline ^a   Müller, Nicole ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905294114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617118     Document Type: Book

References (278)

1. Alajouanine, T. (1956). Verbal realization in aphasia. Brain, 79, 1-28.
2. Albert, M. S., Naeser,M.A., Levine, H. L.,Garvey, J. (1984). Ventricular size in patients with presenile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Archives of Neurology, 41, 1258-1263.
3. Althusser,L. (2001). Lenin, philosophy and other essays.NewYork:MonthlyReviewPress.
4. Alzheimer,A. (1907). über eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde [On a peculiar disease of the cerebral cortex]. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, 64, 146-148.
5. Alzheimer's Association. (2005) Retrieved January 9, 2005, fromAlzheimer's Association Web site: www.alz.org American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision. Washington, DC: Author.
6. Atkinson, J. M., and Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. London: Macmillan.
7. Atkinson, J. M.,andHeritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Austin, J. L. (1967). How to do things with words (2nd ed.) (J. O. Urmsson and M. Sbisa, Eds.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10. Bach, K., and Harnisch, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Bakhtin,M.(1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University ofTexas Press.
13. Ball, M. J., Esling, J., Dickson, C. (1999). Transcribing voice. In R. D. KentandM. J. Ball (Eds.),Voice quality measurement (pp. 49-58). San Diego,CA:Singular Publishing.
14. Ball, M. J., and Rahilly, J. (2002). Transcribing disordered speech: The segmental and prosodic layers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 329-344.
15. Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L.,andTooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Bauman, R., and Sherzer, J. (Eds.). (1974). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bayles, K. A. (1982). Language function in senile dementia. Brain and Language, 16, 265-280.
18. Bayles, K. A., and Kaszniak, A.W. (1987). Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston: College-Hill.
19. Bayles, K. A., and Kim, E. S. (2003). Improving the functioning of individuals with Alzheimer's disease: Emergence of behavioral interventions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 327-343.
20. Bayles,K. A., Tomoeda, C. K., Kaszniak, A., Stern, L. Z.,andEgans, K. K. (1985).Verbal perseveration of dementia patients. Brain and Language, 25, 102-116.
21. Bell, A. (1991). The language of new media. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
22. Ben-Yishay, Y. (2000).Aholistic perspective. In A. ChristensenandB. P.Uzzell (Eds.), International handbook of neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 127-136). New York: Kluwer.
23. Berrewaerts, J., Hupet, M.,andFeyereisen, P. (2003). Langage et démence: examen des capacités pragmatiques dans la maladie d'Alzheimer. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 13, 165-207.
24. Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., and Roth, M. (1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 797-811.
25. Bliss, L. (2002). Discourse Impairments: Assessment and intervention applications. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
26. Body, R., and Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, interactive behaviour. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 379-392.
27. Boller, F., Boller,M., Denes, G., TimberlakeW. H., Zieper, I., and Albert, M. (1973). Familial palilalia. Neurology, 23, 1117-1125.
28. Botella L. (2004). Constructivism and narrative psychology, p. 3. Retrieved October 11, 2004, fromhttp://www.infomed.es/constructivism/documsweb/andreas.html Bourdieu,P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
29. Brain, R. (1965). Speech disorders. London: Butterworth.
30. Brody, E. (1971). Excess disabilities of mentally impaired aged: Impact of individualized treatment. Gerontologist, 25, 124-133.
31. Brown, G., and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Brown, L. (Ed.). (1993). The new shorter Oxford English dictionary (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
33. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Buchan, R. J., Nagata, K., Yokoyama, E., Langman, P., Yuya, H., Hirata, Y., Hatazawa, J.,andKanno, I. (1997). Regional correlations between EEG and oxygen metabolism in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 103, 409-417.
35. Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439-1465.
36. Buckingham, H. W., Whitaker, H., and Whitaker, H. A. (1979). On linguistic perseveration. In H. WhitakerandH.A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 328-352). New York: Academic Press.
37. Button, G. (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
39. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton,M. B.H., and Richardson, K. (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and research. London: Routledge.
40. Candlin, C. (1995). General introduction. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical discourse analysis (pp. vii-xi). London: Longman.
41. Causino Lamar, M.A., Obler, L. K., Knoefel, J. A.,andAlbert, M. L. (1994). Cohesive devices and conversational discourse in Alzheimer's disease. In Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, and J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 201-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Charniak, E. (1972). Towards a model of childrens's story comprehension. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Monographs (Tech. rep. TR 226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Cheepen, C. (1987). The predictability of everyday conversation. London: Pinter.
44. Chen, M., and Fernandez, H. L. (2001). Alzheimer movement re-examined 25 years later: Is it a "disease" or a senile condition in medical nature? Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, e30-40.
45. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
46. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. (2002). Volume 16(5).
49. Coates, J. (1996).Women talk. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
50. Coates, J., and Thornborrow, J. (1999). Myth, lies and audiotapes: Some thoughts on data transcripts. Discourse and Society, 10, 594-597.
51. Code, C. F. S. (1982). Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterance in aphasia. Cortex, 18, 141-152.
52. Code, C. F. S. (1989). Recurrent utterances and automatisms in aphasia. In C. F. S.Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 155-172). London: Taylor and Francis.
53. Collerton, D.,andFairbairn, A. (1985). Alzheimer's and the hippocampus. The Lancet, 2, 278-279.
54. Coulter, J. (1989). The social construction of mind. London: Macmillan Coupland, J., Coupland, N., and Robinson, J. D. (1992). How are you? Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society, 21, 207-230 Creswell, J.W. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Creswell, J.W. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
56. Critchley, M. (1970). Aphasiology and other aspects of language. London: Arnold.
57. Cummings, J. L.,andBenson, D. F. (1983). Dementia of the Alzheimer type: An inventory of diagnostic clinical features. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 34, 12-19.
58. Cummings, J. L., Benson, D. F.,Hill, M. A.,andRead, S. (1985). Aphasia in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Neurology, 35, 394-397.
59. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
60. Damico, J. S. (1985) Clinical discourse analysis: A functional language assessment technique. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success: Assessment of language learning in disabled students (pp. 165-204). San Diego, CA: College Hill.
61. Damico, J. S. (1992). Systematic observation of communicative interaction: Avalid and practical descriptive assessment technique. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 133-143.
62. Damico, J. S., Oelschlaeger,M.,andSimmons-Mackie, N. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13, 667-679.
63. Damico, J. S., and Simmons-Mackie, N. (2002). The base layer and the gaze/gesture layer of transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 317-327.
64. Damico, J. S., Simmons-Mackie, N., Oelschlaeger, M., Elman, R., and Armstrong, E. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Basic issues. Aphasiology, 13, 651-665.
65. DeClercq, A. (2000). (Participant) observation in nursing home wards for people suffering from dementia: The problems of trust and emotional involvement. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1(1). Retrieved August 8, 2004, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-00/100declercq-e.htm DeLacoste, M.,andWhite, C. L. (1993). The role of cortical connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease pathogenesis: A review and model system. Neurobiology of Aging, 14, 1-16.
66. Dennett, D. C. (1990). True believers: The intentional strategy and why it works. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition (pp. 75-87). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
67. Dore, J. (1979). Conversation and preschool language development. In P. FletcherandM. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 279-308). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Duchan, J. (1994), Approaches to the study of discourse in the social sciences. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S.De Santi, and J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 1-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Duranti, A., and Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
71. Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (2001). Discursive psychology. In A. W. McHoul and M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyze talk in institutional settings:Acasebook of methods (pp. 12-24). London: Continuum International.
72. Edwards, J. A. (1993). Principles and contrasting systems of discourse description. In J. A. Edwards andM. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse Research (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Edwards, J. A. (2001.) The transcription of discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen,andH. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 321-348). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
74. Eggins, S., and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Caswell.
75. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
76. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London Longman.
77. Fasold, R. (1990). Sociolinguistics of language. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
78. Feil, N. (1982).Validation: The Feil method. Cleveland,OH:EdwardFeil Productions.
79. Feiser, J. (Ed). (2004). The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Section 6. Retrieved October 2004 from NWW.iep.utm.edu Fine, E. (1983). In defense of literary dialect:Aresponse to Dennis R. Preston. Journal of American Folklore, 96, 323-330.
80. Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. London: OxfordUniversity Press.
81. Foucault, M. (1984). The order of discourse. In M. Shapiro (Ed.), Language and politics. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
82. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
83. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
84. Fox, P. (1989). From senility to Alzheimer's disease: The rise of the Alzheimer's disease movement. Millbank Quarterly, 67, 58-102.
85. Friedland, D.,andMiller,N. (1999). Language mixing in bilingual speakers with Alzheimer's dementia: A conversation analysis approach. Aphasiology 13, 427-444.
86. Gaik, F. (1992). Radio talk-show therapy and the pragmatics of possible worlds. In A. DurantiandC. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 271-289). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
87. Galtung, J., and Ruge, M. (1973). Structuring and selecting news. In S. Cohen and J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media (pp. 62-72). London: Constable.
88. Garcia, L. J., and Joanette, Y. (1994). Conversational topic-shifting analysis in dementia. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S.De Santi, and J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 161-184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
89. Garcia, L. J., and Joanette, Y. (1997). Analysis of topic shifts: A multiple case study. Brain and Language, 58, 92-114.
90. Gardner,H. (1974). The shattered mind: The person after brain damage. New York: Random House.
91. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
92. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
93. Gergen K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in everyday life. New York: Greenwood.
94. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretive sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
95. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
96. Giles, H.,andCoupland, N. (1991). Language contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
97. Glasgow University Media Group. (1976). Bad news. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
98. Glosser, G.,andDeser, T. (1990). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67-88.
99. Goffman, E. (1964). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.
100. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon.
101. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
102. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
103. Golander, H.,andRaz, A. E. (1996). The mask of dementia: Images of "demented residents" in a nursing ward. Ageing and Society, 16, 269-285.
104. Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003). Conversation and brain damage.New York: Oxford University Press.
105. Goodwin, C., and Duranti, A. (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
106. Goodwin C., and Harness-Goodwin, M. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. DurantiandC. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
107. Goodwin, C., and Harness-Goodwin, M. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 239-257). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
108. Goodwin, C., and Heritage, J. (1990). Conversational analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
109. Goodwin, J. S. (1991). Geriatric ideology: The myth of the myth of senility. In J. A. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Aging and everyday life (pp. 331-339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, 627-231.
110. Gott, P. (2004). Ask Dr Gott: Alzheimer's devastates lives of patient, family. Hammond Daily Star, March 28, 2004, Section G, p. 4.
111. Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
112. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377-388.
113. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L.Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic.
114. Grimes, J. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
115. Grundy, P. (1995). Doing pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
116. Guendouzi, J. (2001). "You'll think we're always bitching": The functions of cooperativity and competition in women's gossip. Discourse Studies, 3, 55-77.
117. Guendouzi, J. (2003). Caregiver beliefs about communication in dementia. Unpublished data.
118. Guendouzi, J., and Müller, N. (2002). Defining trouble sources in dementia: Repair strategies and conversational satisfaction in interactions with an Alzheimer's patient. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, and N. Hewlett (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
119. Gumperz, J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
120. Gumperz, J. (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
121. Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
122. Gurland, B., Copeland, J., Kuriansky, J., Kelleher,M., Sharpe, L.,andDean, L. L. (1983). The mind and mood of aging. London: Croom Helm.
123. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
124. Hainsworth, S. (2000). Gramsci's hegemony theory and the ideological role of mass media. Retrieved October 11, 2004, from http://www.cultsock.ndirect.co.uk/MUHome/cshtml/contributions/gramsci.html Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe A., andWillis, P. (1980). Culture, media, language. London: Hutchinson.
125. Halliday,M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
126. Halliday,M.A.K. (1985). Anintroduction to functional grammar. London: EdwardArnold.
127. Halliday,M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
128. Hamilton, H. E. (1994a). Conversations with an alzheimer's patient: An interactional sociolinguistic study. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
129. Hamilton, H. E. (1994b). Requests for clarification as evidence of pragmatic comprehension difficulty: The case of Alzheimer's disease. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, and J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 185-200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
130. Hancher,M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 8, 1-14.
131. Harness-Goodwin, M. (1994). Social differentiation and alliance formation in an urban black children's peer group. In M. R. Stevenson (Ed.), Gender roles through the life span (pp. 31-43). Muncie, IN: Ball State University Press.
132. Harness-Goodwin, M.,andGoodwin, C. (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. AuerandA. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77-99). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
133. Harré, R. (1983). Personal being. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
134. Harré, R. (1991). The discursive production of selves. Theory and Psychology, 1, 51-63.
135. Harré, R., and van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
136. Hays, S. J., Niven, B., Godfrey,H. P. D.,andLinscott, R. J. (2004). Clinical assessment of pragmatic language impairment: A generalisability study of older people with Alzheimer's disease. Aphasiology, 18, 693-714.
137. Hecaen, H., and Albert, M. L. (1978). Human neuropsychology. New York: Wiley.
138. Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
139. Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. RogerandP. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 21-47). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
140. Hodge, R., and Kress, G. (1992). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
141. Huber, W., Poeck, K., and Weniger, D. (1982). Aphasie [Aphasia]. In K. Poeck (Ed.), Klinische Neuropsychologie (pp. 241-260). Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
142. Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
143. Hustad, K. C.,andBeukelman, D. R. (2001). Effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion on intelligibility of severely dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 497-510.
144. Hustad, K. C., and Beukelman, D. R. (2002). Listener comprehension of severely dysarthric speech: Effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 45, 545-558.
145. Hyltenstam, K.,andStroud, C. (1993). Second language regression in Alzheimer's dementia. In K. Hyltenstam and Å.Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 222-242). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
146. Hymes, D. (1972a). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. GumperzandD.Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
147. Hymes, D. (1972b). Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 21-44). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
148. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
149. Hymes, D. (1981). "In vain I tried to tell you." Essays in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
150. Jaworski, A., and Coupland, N. (1999). The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
151. Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47-96.
152. Kafka, F. (1915/1988). The metamorphosis (Bantam Classics). New York: Chelsea House Publishers.
153. Kazui, H., Mori, E., Hashimoto, M., and Hirono, N. (2003). Enhancement of declarative memory by emotional arousal and visual memeory function in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 15, 221-226.
154. Kempler, D. (1995). Language changes in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. In R. Lubinski (Ed.), Dementia and communication (pp. 98-114). San Diego,CA:Singular.
155. Kent, R. D. (Ed.). (1992a). Intelligibility in speech disorders. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
156. Kent, R. D. (1992b). Introduction. In R. D. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders (pp 1-10). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
157. Kent, R. D., Miolo, G.,andBloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of children's speech:A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 3, 81-95.
158. Kent, R. D.,Weismer, G., Kent, J. F.,andRosenbeck, J. C. (1989). Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 482-499.
159. Kitwood, T. (1988). The technical, the personal, and the framing of dementia. Social Behaviour, 3, 161-179.
160. Kitwood, T. (1990). The dialectics of dementia:With particular reference to Alzheimer's disease. Ageing and Society, 10,177-196.
161. Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
162. Kitwood, T., and Bredin, K. (1992). Towards a theory of dementia care: Personhood and well-being. Ageing and Society, 12, 269-287.
163. Kress, G. (1988). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
164. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
165. Kuiper, K., and Everaert, M. (2000). Constraints on the phrase structural properties of English phrasal lexical items. In B. Roswadowska (Ed.), PASE papers in language studies (pp. 152-170). Wroclaw, Poland: Aksel s. c.
166. Kurzweil, R. (1999) The age of spiritual machines. New York: Penguin.
167. Labov,W., and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.
168. Labov,W.,andWaletsky, J. (1966). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
169. LeDoux, J. (2002). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
170. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
171. Lincoln, Y., and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
172. Lindsay, J., andWilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: Acomparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305-325.
173. Linscott, R. J., Knight, R. G.,andGodfrey,H. P.D. (1996). The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): Ameasure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury, 10, 397-412.
174. Littlejohn, S.W. (1999). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
175. Lubinski, R. (Ed.). (1995). Dementia and communication. San Diego, CA: Singular.
176. Ludlow, C. L., Polinsky, R. J., Caine, E. D., Bassich, C. J., and Ebert, M. H. (1982). Language and speech abnormalities in Tourette syndrome. Advances in Neurology, 35, 351-361.
177. Luria, A. R. (1987a). The man with a shattered world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
178. Luria, A. R. (1987b). The mind of a mnemonist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
179. Lyman, K. A. (1989). Bringing the social back in: a critique of the biomedicalization of dementia. The Gerontologist, 229, 597-605.
180. Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
181. Machetanz, J., Schönle, P.W., Benecke, R. (1988). Iterative Dysarthrie beim M. Parkinson [Iterative dysarthria in Parkinson's disease]. Nervenarzt, 59, 559-661.
182. Malinowski, B. (1972). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement to C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1923) Malmkjaer,K. (1991). The linguistics encyclopedia. London: RoutledgeandKegan Paul.
183. McDermott, R. (1977). The ethnography of speaking and reading. In R. Shuy (Ed.), Linguistic theory (pp. 198-213). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
184. Mentis, M., Briggs-Whittaker, J.,andGramigna,G.D. (1995). Discourse topic management in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1054-1066.
185. Mey, J. L. (1985). Whose language: A study in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
186. Minsky, M. (1977). Frame-system theory. In P. N. Johnson-Laird and P. C. Watson (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 355-376). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
187. Molloy,D.W.,andLubinski, R. (1995). Dementia: Impact and clinical perspectives. In R. Lubinski (Ed. ), Dementia and communication (pp. 2-21). San Diego, CA: Singular.
188. Müller,N. (2003). Intelligibility and negotiated meaning in interaction. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 317-324.
189. Müller, N., and Damico, J. S. (2002). A transcription toolkit: Theoretical and clinical considerations. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 299-316.
190. Müller,N.,andGuendouzi, J. A. (2002). Transcribing discourse: Interactions with Alzheimer's disease. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 345-359.
191. Müller, N., and Guendouzi, J. A. (2005). Order and disorder in conversation: Encounters with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 393-404.
192. Obler, L. K., De Santi, S.,andGoldberger,M.A. (1995). Bilingual dementia: Pragmatic breakdown. In R. Lubinski (Ed.), Dementia and communication (pp. 133-139). San Diego, CA: Singular.
193. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic.
194. Ogden, J. A. (1996). Fractured minds: Acase study approach to clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
195. Pawley, A., and Syder, F. H. (2000). The one-clause-at-a-time-hypothesis. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 163-199). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
196. Peccei, J. S (1999). Pragmatics. Routledge LanguageWorkbooks. London: Routledge.
197. Perkins, L., Whitworth, A.,andLesser,R. (1998). Conversing in dementia:Aconversation analytical approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 33-53.
198. Perkins, M. (2000). The scope of pragmatic disability: A cognitive approach. In N. Müller (Ed.), Pragmatics in speech-language pathology (pp. 7-28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
199. Perkins, M. (2002). An emergentist approach to clinical pragmatics. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, and N. Hewlett (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
200. Perkins, M. (2003). Clinical pragmatics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert, and C. Bulcaen (Eds), Handbook of pragmatics: 2001 installment (pp. 1-29). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
201. Perkins, M. (2005). Pragmatic ability and disability as emergent phenomena. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 367-378.
202. Perkins, M. (in press). Pragmatics and communication impairment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
203. Perkins, M., Body, R., and Parker, M. (1995). Closed head injury: Assessment and remediation of topic bias and repetitiveness. In M. Perkins and S. Howards (Eds.), Case studies in clinical linguistics (pp. 293-320). London: Whurr.
204. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate. New York: Viking.
205. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Scheinken (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-101). New York Academic.
206. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. M. Atkinson and J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
207. Potter, J. (2003).Adiscursive psychology of institutions.Paper presented at the BPS Social Psychology Section Annual Conference, London School of Economics, London.
208. Potter, J., andWetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
209. Powell, J. A., Hale, M. A.,andBayer,A. J. (1995). Symptoms of communication breakdown in dementia: Carers' perspectives. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 65-75.
210. Prigatano, G. P. (2000).Abrief overview of four principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation. In A. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), International handbook of Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 115-125). New York: Kluwer.
211. Psathas, G., and Anderson, T. (1990). The "practices" of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78, 75-99.
212. Pye, C.,Wilcox, K. A., and Siren, K. A. (1988). Refining transcription: The significance of transcriber errors. Journal of Child Language, 15, 17-37.
213. Ramanathan,V. (1997). Alzheimer discourse: Some sociolinguistic dimensions.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
214. Ramanathan-Abbot,V. (1994). Interactional differences in Alzheimer's discourse: An examination of AD speech across two audiences. Language and Society, 23, 31-58.
215. Reisberg, B. (1983). Alzheimer's disease: The standard reference.NewYork: Free Press.
216. Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J., and Crook, T. (1982) The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136-1139.
217. Rempusheski, V. F. (1999). Qualitative research and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer disease and related disorders, 13 (Suppl. 1), S45-S49.
218. Ripich, D. N.,andTerrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 8-19.
219. Ripich, D. N., Vertes, D., Whitehouse, P., Fulton, S., and Ekelman, B. (1991). Turn-taking and speech act patterns in the discourse of senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type patients. Brain and Language, 40, 330-343.
220. Roberts, C. (1997). Transcribing talk: Issues of representation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 167-172.
221. Sabat, S. R. (1991). Turn-taking and turn-giving, and Alzheimer's disease: A case study in conversation. Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 2, 161-175.
222. Sabat, S. R. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer's disease: Life through a tangled web. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
223. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A.,andJefferson, G. (1974).Asimplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
224. Salmon, D. P.,Heindel,W. C.,andButters, N. (1995). Patterns of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. In R. Lubinski (Ed.), Dementia and communication (pp. 37-46). San Diego, CA: Singular.
225. Santo Pietro, M. J., and Ostuni, E. (2003). Successful communication with persons with Alzheimer's disease: An in-service manual. St Louis, MO: Heinemann.
226. Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication. An introduction. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
227. Schegloff, E. (1987). Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Gressen, R. Munch, and N. Smelser (Eds.), The macro link (pp. 207-234). Berkeley: University of California Press.
228. Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 21-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
229. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
230. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (2001). (Eds.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
231. Schwartz, J. M.,andBegley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain.NewYork: HarperCollins.
232. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
233. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic
234. Searle, J. (1979). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In J. Searle (Ed.), Expression and meaning (pp. 1-29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
235. Shenk, D. (2001). The forgetting. Alzheimer's disease: Portrait of an epidemic.New York: Anchor.
236. Sherzer, J. (1994). Transcription, representation and translation: Repetition and performance in Kuna discourse. In B. Johnstone (Ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 37-52). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
237. Shindler, A. G., Caplan, L. R., and Hier, D. B. (1984). Intrusions and perseverations. Brain and Language, 23, 148-158.
238. Shweder, R. (1983). Beyond self-constructed knowledge: The study of culture and morality. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 41-69.
239. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage.
240. Simmons-Mackie, N., and Damico, J. S. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Ethnography. Aphasiology, 13, 681-687.
241. Simmons-Mackie, N., and Kagan, A. (1999). Communication strategies used by "good" versus "poor" speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13, 807-820.
242. Sinclair, J., and Coultard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. New York: Oxford University Press.
243. Sjogren, T., Sjogren, H.,andLindgren, A. G. H. (1952). Morbus Alzheimer and morbus Pick.Agenetic, clinical and pathoanatomical study. Acta Psychiatrica Neurologica Scandinavica, 82, 1-152.
244. Snowden, D. (2001). Aging with grace. New York: Bantam.
245. Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
246. Strawson, P. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439-460.
247. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
248. Tajfel, H. (1979). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61-76).NewYork: Academic.
249. Tannen,D.(1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talkamongfriends.Norwood,NJ: Ablex.
250. Tannen, D. (1990). Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends talk. Discourse Processes, 13, 73-90.
251. Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., and Roth, M. (1968). Observations on the brains of non-demented old people. Journal of Neurological Science, 7, 331-336.
252. Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., and Roth, M. (1970). Observations on the brains of demented old people. Journal of Neurological Science, 11, 205-242.
253. Trees, A. R., and Manusov, V. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism: Integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female dyads. Human Communication Research, 24, 564-683.
254. Turner, R. (1974). Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
255. Tyler, S. (1986). Post-modern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In J. CliffordandG. Marcus (Eds.),Writing culture (pp. 122-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
256. Ulatowska, H. K. (Ed.). (1985). The aging brain: Communication in the elderly. San Diego, CA: College Hill.
257. Ulatowska, H. K., and Chapman, S. B. (1995). Discourse studies. In R. Lubinski (Ed.), Dementia and communication (pp. 115-130). San Diego, CA: Singular.
258. Van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (1985a). Handbook of discourse analysis. Volume 1: Disciplines of discourse. New York: Academic.
259. VanDijk, T. (1985b). Introduction: Discourse as a newcross-discipline. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Volume 1: Disciplines of discourse (pp. 1-10). New York: Academic.
260. Van Dijk,T. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
261. Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage.
262. Van Dijk, T. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and M. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
263. Van Lancker-Sidtis, D. (2004). When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-processing model of language. International Journal of Disorders of Communication, 39, 1-44.
264. Verschueren, J. (2001). Predicaments of criticism. Critique of Anthropology, 21, 59-81.
265. Wallesch, C. W. (1990). Repetitive verbal behaviour: Functional and neurological considerations. Aphasiology, 4, 133-154.
266. Wallesch, C. W., and Blanken, B. G. (2000). Recurring utterances-How, where, and why are they generated. Brain and Language, 71, 225-227.
267. Watson, C. M., Chenery, H. J., and Carter,M. S. (1999). An analysis of trouble and repair in the natural conversations of people with the Alzheimer's type. Aphasiology, 13, 195-218.
268. Weismer,G., Jeng, J. Y., Laures, J. S., Kent, R. D.,andKent, J. F. (2001). Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 53, 1-18.
269. Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13, 327-343.
270. Williams, A., and Guendouzi, J. (2000). Adjusting to the home: Dialectical dilemmas and personal relationships in a retirement community. Journal of Communiction, 50, 365-382
271. Williams, A., and Nussbaum, J. (2001). Intergenerational communication across the life span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
272. Wilson, E. O. (1978).Onhuman nature. Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversity Press.
273. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)
274. Wootton, A. (1989). The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences. Semiotica, 37, 59-89
275. Wray,A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
276. Yorkston, K. M.,andBeukelman, D. R. (1978).Acomparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 499-512.
277. Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., and Bell, K. R. (1999). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: ProEd.
278. Zimmerman, D. (1988). On conversation: The conversation analytic perspective. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 406-432). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.