Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Basic issues

Aphasiology

Volumn 13, Issue 9-11, 1999, Pages 651-665

  Damico, Jack S ^a   Simmons Mackie, Nina ^b   Oelschlaeger, Mary ^c   Elman, Roberta ^d   Armstrong, Elizabeth ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Aphasia Center of California   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0032852269     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026870399401768     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (78)

1. AGAR, M. 1986, Speaking of Ethnography (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
2. BATESON, G. 1972, Steps to an Ecology of Mind (San Francisco: Chandler Press).
3. BLOOM, L. 1971, Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
4. BROWN, R. 1973, A First Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
5. BRUNER, J. 1975, The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-19.
6. BRYMAN, A. 1988, Quantity and Quality in Social Research (London: Unwin Hyman).
7. CAMPBELL, D. T. and STANLEY, J. C. 1966, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Chicago: Rand-McNally).
8. CRESWELL, J. W. 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
9. DAMICO, J. S., SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. N. and SCHWEITZER, L. A. 1995, Addressing the third law of gardening: methodological alternatives in aphasiology. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 83-93.
10. DARLEY, F. L. 1991, I think it begins with an 'A'. Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 9-20.
11. DENZIN, N. 1970, The Research Act in Sociology (London: Butterworth).
12. DENZIN, N. 1989, Interpretive Interactionalism (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
13. DENZIN, N. K. and LINCOLN, Y. S. (Eds), 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
14. DURANTI, A. and GOODWIN, C. (Eds) 1992, Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
15. EISNER, E. 1991, The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice (New York: Macmillian).
16. ELMAN, R. J. 1995, Multimethod research: a search for understanding. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 77-82.
17. FERGUSON, A. 1996. Describing competence in aphasic/normal conversation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 10, 55-63.
18. FIELDING, N. G. (Ed) 1988, Actions and Structure (London: Sage).
19. FIELDING, N. G. and FIELDING, J. L. 1986, Linking Data (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
20. FLICK U. 1992, Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 27, 175-198.
21. GARFINKEL, H. 1967, Studies in Ethnomethology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
22. GEERTZ, C. 1973, The Interpretation of Culture (New York: Basic Books).
23. GLASER, B. and STRAUSS, A. 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (New York: Aldine).
24. GOFFMAN, E. 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
25. GOODWIN, C. 1981, Conversational organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers (New York: Academic Press).
26. GOODWIN, C. 1995, Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. In S. Jacoby and E. Ochs (Eds) Research in Language and Social Interaction (Special issue of Construction). 28, 233-260.
27. GUBA, E. G. and LINCOLN, Y. S. 1994, Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 105-117.
28. HAMMERSLEY, M. 1992, What's Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations (London: Routledge).
29. HAMMERSLEY, M. and ATKINSON, P. 1983, Ethnography: Principles in Practice (London: Tavistock).
30. HARRE, R. 1980, Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology (Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Littlefield).
31. HERITAGE, J. 1984, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polity Press).
32. HOLLAND, A. L. 1980, Communicative Abilities in Daily Living: A test of functional communication for aphasic adults (Baltimore: University Park Press).
33. HOLLAND, A. L. 1982, Observing functional communication in aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50-56.
34. HOLLAND, A. L 1994, A look into a cloudy crystal ball for specialists in neurogenic language disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 34-36.
35. JACKSON, J. H. 1874, On the nature of the duality of the brain. Reprinted in Brain, 38, 81-103, 1915.
36. JANESICK, V. L. 1994, The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 209-219.
37. KEARNS, K. P. and THOMPSON, C. K. 1991, Technical drift and conceptual myopia: the Merlin Effect. Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 31-40.
38. KERLINGER, F. 1973, Foundations of Behavioral Research. (2nd Edition) (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
39. KIRK, J. and MILLER, M. 1986, Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. (London: Sage).
40. KLIPPI, A. 1991, Conversational dynamics between aphasics. Aphasiology, 5, 373-378.
41. LEDORZE, G. and BRASSARD, C. 1995, A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology, 9, 239-255.
42. LEVI-STRAUSS, C. 1966, The Savage Mind. (2nd Edition) (Chicago: University of Chicago).
43. LINCOLN, Y. S. and GUBA, E. G. 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry (Beverly Hills, CA; Sage).
44. LURIA, A. R. 1970, Traumatic Aphasia. (The Hague: Mouton).
45. LYND, R. S. and LYND, H. M. 1929, Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture (New York: Harcourt Brace).
46. LYON, J. G. 1992, Communication use and participation in life for adults with aphasia in natural settings: the scope of the problem. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 7-14.
47. MALINOWSKI, B. 1922, Argonauts of the Western Pacific. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
48. MAXWELL, J. A. 1996, Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications).
49. MEEHL, P. 1954, Clinical and Statistical Prediction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
50. MILROY, L. and PERKINS, L. 1992, Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 27-40.
51. MOUSTAKIS, C. 1990, Heuristic Research Design, Methodology, and Applications. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
52. NELSON, C., TREICHLER, P. and GROSSBERG, L. 1992, Cultural studies. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. Treichler (Eds), Cultural Studies (New York: Routledge), pp. 1-16.
53. OELSCHLAEGER, M. and DAMICO, J. S. 1998, Spontaneous verbal repetition: a social strategy in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 12, 971-988.
54. OXENHAM, D., SHEARD, C. and ADAMS, R. 1995, Comparison of clinician and spouse perceptions of the handicap of aphasia: everybody understands 'understanding'. Aphasiology, 9, 477-493.
55. PARR, S. 1994, Coping with aphasia: conversations with 20 aphasic people. Aphasiology, 8, 457-466.
56. PERKINS, L. 1995, Applying conversational analysis to aphasia: clinical implications and analytic issues. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 372-383.
57. PIAGET, J. 1974, The Language and Thought of the Child (New York: New American Library).
58. PIKE, K. 1967, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour (The Hague: Mouton).
59. POPPER, K. 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books).
60. PORCH, B. E. 1967, Porch Index of Communicative Ability. (Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press).
61. RAGIN, C. C. 1987, The Comparative Method: Moving Bejond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
62. SACKS, H. 1992, Lectures on Conversation, Vol I & II. (Oxford: Blackwell).
63. SCHEGLOFF, E. 1968, Sequencings in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
64. SCHUELL, H. 1965, Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia with the Minnesota Test (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
65. SIDMAN, M. 1960, Tactics of Scientific Research (New York: Basic Books).
66. SILVERMAN, D. 1993, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction (London: Sage Publications).
67. SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. N. and DAMICO, J. S. 1997, Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 761-781.
68. SMITH, N. 1970, Replication studies: a neglected aspect of psychological research. American Psychologist, 25, 970-975.
69. SPRADLEY, J. P. 1980 Participant Observation (New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston).
70. TAYLOR, M. 1965, A measurement of functional communication in aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 46, 101-107.
71. THOMPSON, C. K. and KEARNS, K. P. 1991, Analytic and technical directions in applied aphasia analysis: the midas touch. Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 41-54.
72. VEBLEN, T. 1918, The Higher Learning in Americas: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Businessmen (New York: Augustus M. Kelley).
73. VIDICH, A. J. and LYMAN, S. M. 1994, Qualitative methods: their history in Sociology and Anthropology. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 23-59.
74. WEBER, M. 1949, Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press).
75. WERTZ, R. T. 1987, Language treatment of aphasia is efficacious, but for whom? Topics in Language Disorders, 8, 1-10.
76. WHYTE, W. F. 1943, Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
77. WILKINSON, R. 1995, Aphasia: conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic person. In M. Perkins and S. Howard (Eds), Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics. (London: Whurr), pp. 277-292.
78. WOLCOTT, H. F. 1994, Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation (Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage).