The relationship between feature binding and consciousness: Evidence from asynchronous multi-modal stimuli

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 586-593

  Zmigrod, Sharon ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Multimodal perception; Perception and action; The binding problem

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEATURE BINDING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051668381     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akyürek E.G., Toffanin P., Hommel B. Adaptive control of event integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:569-577.
2. Baars B.J. A cognitive theory of consciousness 1988, Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Bar M. The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009, 364:1235-1243.
4. Crick F., Koch C. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences 1990, 2:263-275.
5. Dehaene S., Naccache L. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 2001, 79:1-37.
6. Engel A.K., Singer W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Science 2001, 5:16-25.
7. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
8. Hommel B. Event files: Evidences for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:183-216.
9. Hommel B. The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 247-273. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
10. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500.
11. Hommel B. Consciousness and control: Not identical twins. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2007, 14:155-176.
12. Hyun J., Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. The role of attention in the binding surface features to locations. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:10-24.
13. Kaas J.H., Hackett T.A. 'What' and 'Where' processing in auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:1045-1047.
14. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object specific information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
15. Keizer A.W., Nieuwenhuis S., Colzato L.S., Theeuwisse W., Rombouts S.A.R.B., Hommel B. When moving faces activate the house area: An fMRI study of object file retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:50.
16. Kühn S., Keizer A., Colzato L.S., Rombouts S.A.R.B., Hommel B. The neural underpinnings of event-file management: Evidence for stimulus-induced activation of, and competition among stimulus-response bindings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:896-904.
17. LaRock E. Disambiguation, binding, and the unity of visual consciousness. Theory Psychology 2007, 17:747-777.
18. Lewald J., Ehrenstein W.H., Guski R. Spatio-temporal constraints for auditory-visual integration. Behavioural Brain Research 2001, 121:69-79.
19. Lewkowicz D.J. Perception of auditory-visual temporal synchrony in human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1094-1106.
20. Mitroff S.R., Scholl B.J., Wynn K. The relationship between object files and conscious perception. Cognition 2005, 96:67-92.
21. Mondor T.A., Hurlburt J., Thorne L. Categorizing sounds by pitch: Effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:107-114.
22. Neisser U. Cognition and reality 1976, Freeman, San Francisco.
23. Schubotz R.I. Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:211-218.
24. Treisman A. Consciousness and perceptual binding. The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, and dissociation 2003, 95-113. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Cleeremans (Ed.).
25. Treisman A. Object tokens, binding and visual memory. Handbook of binding and memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience 2006, Oxford University Press, New York, (pp. 315-338). H. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, U. Lindenberge (Eds.).
26. van Leeuwen C. Synchrony, binding, and consciousness: How are they related?. Theory Psychology 2007, 17:779-790.
27. van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Temporal window of integration in bimodal speech. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:598-607.
28. von der Malsburg C. The what and why of binding: The modeleŕs perspective. Neuron 1999, 24:95-104.
29. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N. Implicit visual attribute binding following bilateral parietal damage. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:157-181.
30. Zacks J.M., Speer N.L., Swallow K.M., Braver T.S., Reynolds J.R. Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:273-293.
31. Zeki S., Bartels A. Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness & Cognition 1999, 8:225-259.
32. Zmigrod S., Hommel B. Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2009, 71:352-362.
33. Zmigrod S., Spapé M., Hommel B. Intermodal event files: Integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action. Psychological Research 2009, 73:674-684.