Detection of significant bacteriuria by use of the iQ200 automated urine microscope

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2855-2860

  Stürenburg, Enno ^a   Kramer, Jan ^a   Schön, Gerhard ^b   Cachovan, Georg ^b   Sobottka, Ingo ^a  

^a LADR GmbH MVZ Dr Kramer and Kollegen   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTERASE; LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE; NITRITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CARBOXYLESTERASE;

ALPHA HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCUS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED URINE MICROSCOPE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BACTERIURIA; CANDIDA; CITROBACTER; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KLEBSIELLA; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LEUKOCYTE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSCOPE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEUS; PSEUDOMONAS; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE; URINALYSIS; URINE CULTURE; URINE CYTOLOGY; URINE MICROSCOPY; URINE REAGENT STRIP TEST; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDY; MASS SCREENING; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; URINE;

AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; BACTERIA; BACTERIURIA; CARBOXYLIC ESTER HYDROLASES; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MICROSCOPY; NITRITES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINE;

EID: 84905230937     PISSN: 00951137     EISSN: 1098660X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00112-14     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine. 2000. European urinalysis guidelines. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 231:1-86. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/00365510050184985.
2. Delanghe J. 2007. New screening diagnostic techniques in urinalysis. Acta Clin. Belg. 62:155-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/acb.2007.026. (Pubitemid 46999661)
3. Thompson R, Gammie A, Lewis D, Smith R, Edwards C. 2010. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency. Evidence review. Automated urine screening systems. http://www.akeah.gov.tr/download.php?d=0&f=201208103741-CEP10030-Automated- Urine-Screening-Evidence-Review.pdf.
4. Van Nostrand JD, Junkins AD, Bartholdi RK. 2000. Poor predictive ability of urinanalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 113:709-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/428N-60XK-UQ3Q-BXLC. (Pubitemid 33044312)
5. Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y. 2010. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133:577-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCP1GT2JXOCQBCZ.
6. Grosso S, Bruschetta G, De Rosa R, Avolio M, Camporese A. 2008. Improving the efficiency and efficacy of pre-analytical and analytical work-flow of urine cultures with urinary flow cytometry. New Microbiol. 31:501-505.
7. Pieretti B, Brunati P, Pini B, Colzani C, Congedo P, Rocci M, Terramocci R. 2010. Diagnosis of bacteriuria and leukocyturia by automated flow cytometry compared with urine culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3990-3996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00975-10.
8. Kadkhoda K, Manickam K, Degagne P, Sokolowski P, Pang P, Kontzie N, Alfa M. 2011. UF-1000i flow cytometry is an effective screening method for urine specimens. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 69:130-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.013.
9. Giesen CD, Greeno AM, Thompson KA, Patel R, Jenkins SM, Lieske JC. 2013. Performance of flow cytometry to screen urine for bacteria and white blood cells prior to urine culture. Clin. Biochem. 46:810-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. clinbiochem.2013.03.005.
10. De Rosa R, Grosso S, Bruschetta G, Avolio M, Stano P, Modolo ML, Camporese A. 2010. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin. Chim. Acta 411:1137-1142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.03.027.
11. Brilha S, Proença H, Cristino JM, Hänscheid T. 2010. Use of flow cytometry (Sysmex UF-100) to screen for positive urine cultures: in search for the ideal cut-off. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 48:289-292. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1515/CCLM.2010.047.
12. Broeren MA, Bahçeci S, Vader HL, Arents NL. 2011. Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:1025-1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01669-10.
13. Jolkkonen S, Paattiniemi EL, Kärpänoja P, Sarkkinen H. 2010. Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3117-3121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00617-10.
14. Manoni F, Fornasiero L, Ercolin M, Tinello A, Ferrian M, Hoffer P, Valverde S, Gessoni G. 2009. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 65:103-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.06.003.
15. Parta M, Hudson BY, Le TP, Ittmann M, Musher DM, Stager C. 2013. IRIS iQ200 workstation as a screen for performing urine culture. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 75:5-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.026.
16. Martinez MH, Bottini PV, Levy CE, Garlipp CR. 2013. UriSed as a screening tool for presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Clin. Chim. Acta 425:77-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.020.
17. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
18. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Müller M. 2011. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2105-12-77.
19. Seshan VE. 16 April 2013. clinfun: clinical trial design and data analysis functions, 2013. http://cran.r-project.org/package=clinfun.
20. van der Zwet WC, Hessels J, Canbolat F, Deckers MM. 2010. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer in the diagnostic work-up of suspected urinary tract infection in a Dutch general hospital. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 48:1765-1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.342.