Temporal dynamics of fibrolytic and methanogenic rumen microorganisms during in situ incubation of switchgrass determined by 16s rRNA gene profiling

Frontiers in Microbiology

Volumn 5, Issue JULY, 2014, Pages

  Piao, Hailan ^a   Lachman, Medora ^b   Malfatti, Stephanie ^c   Sczyrba, Alexander ^d   Knierim, Bernhard ^e   Auer, Manfred ^e   Tringe, Susannah G ^f   Mackie, Roderick I ^g   Yeoman, Carl J ^b   Hess, Matthias ^a,f,h  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^h PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulolytic bacteria; Methanogenic archaea; Microbe microbe interactions; Rumen microbiology

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; RNA 16S;

AMPLICON; ARTICLE; BACILLI; BACTEROIDIA; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; CLOSTRIDIA; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DNA BARCODING; DNA EXTRACTION; EURYARCHAEOTA; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHANOGENESIS; METHANOGENIC ARCHAEON; METHANOGENIC FERMENTATION; MICROBIAL COLONIZATION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; MICROBIOME; NONHUMAN; PANICUM VIRGATUM; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PYROSEQUENCING; RNA GENE; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84905165145     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1664302X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00307     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bauchop, T., and Mountfort, D. O. (1981). Cellulose fermentation by a rumen anaerobic fungus in both the absence and presence of rumen methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42, 1103-1110.
2. Bowman, J. G., and Firkins, J. L. (1993). Effects of forage species and particle size on bacterial cellulolytic activity and colonization in situ. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1623-1633.
3. Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335-336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
4. Coleman, G. S. (1992). The rate of uptake and metabolism of starch grains and cellulose particles by Entodinium species, Eudiplodinium maggii, some other entodiniomorphid protozoa and natural protozoal populations taken from the ovine rumen. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 73, 507-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb05013.x
5. Corpe, W. A. (1985). A method for detecting methylotrophic bacteria on solid-surfaces. J. Microbiol. Methods 3, 215-221. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(85)90049-1
6. Edgar, R. C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460-2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
7. Edwards, J. E., Huws, S. A., Kim, E. J., and Kingston-Smith, A. H. (2007). Characterization of the dynamics of initial bacterial colonization of nonconserved forage in the bovine rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 323-335. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00392.x
8. Edwards, J. E., Kingston-Smith, A. H., Jimenez, H. R., Huws, S. A., Skot, K. P., Griffith, G. W., et al. (2008). Dynamics of initial colonization of nonconserved perennial ryegrass by anaerobic fungi in the bovine rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 66, 537-545. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00563.x
9. Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., Wrighton, K. C., Zvenigorodsky, N., Chen, F., Ochman, H., et al. (2010). Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J. 4, 642-647. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.153
10. Fondevila, M., and Dehority, B. A. (1996). Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 678-684.
11. Goering, H. K., and Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis. Vol. 379. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
12. Green, P. N. (2006). Methylobacterium. Prokaryotes 5, 257-265. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30745-1_14
13. Heredia, A., Jimenez, A., and Guillen, R. (1995). Composition of plant-cell walls. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung -Forschung 200, 24-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01192903
14. Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T. W., Chokhawala, H., Schroth, G., et al. (2011). Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331, 463-467. doi: 10.1126/science.1200387
15. Hungate, R. E., Smith, W., Bauchop, T., Yu, I., and Rabinowitz, J. C. (1970). Formate as an intermediate in the bovine rumen fermentation. J. Bacteriol. 102, 389-397.
16. Huws, S. A., Mayorga, O. L., Theodorou, M. K., Onime, L. A., Kim, E. J., Cookson, A. H., et al. (2013). Successional colonization of perennial ryegrass by rumen bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 56, 186-196. doi: 10.1111/lam.12033
17. Ishii, S., Kosaka, T., Hotta, Y., and Watanabe, K. (2006). Simulating the contribution of coaggregation to interspecies hydrogen fluxes in syntrophic methanogenic consortia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5093-5096. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00333-06
18. Janssen, P. H., and Kirs, M. (2008). Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3619-3625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02812-07
19. Joblin, K. N., Campbell, G. P., Richardson, A. J., and Stewart, C. S. (1989). Fermentation of barley straw by anaerobic rumen bacteria and fungi in axenic culture and in co-culture with methanogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 9, 195-197. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1989.tb00323.x
20. Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H.-P., and Bohn, A. (2005). Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3358-3393. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460587
21. Kudo, H., Cheng, K. J., and Costerton, J. W. (1987). Interactions between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Can. J. Microbiol. 33, 244-248. doi: 10.1139/m87-041
22. Latham, M. J., and Wolin, M. J. (1977). Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34, 297-301.
23. Leahy, S. C., Kelly, W. J., Altermann, E., Ronimus, R. S., Yeoman, C. J., Pacheco, D. M., et al. (2010). The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLoS ONE 5:e8926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008926
24. McDonald, D., Price, M. N., Goodrich, J., Nawrocki, E. P., DeSantis, T. Z., Probst, A., et al. (2012). An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610-618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139
25. Rychlik, J. L., and May, T. (2000). The effect of a methanogen, Methanobrevibacter smithii, on the growth rate, organic acid production, and specific ATP activity of three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 40, 176-180. doi: 10.1007/s002849910035
26. Sabine, J. R., and Johnson, B. C. (1964). Acetate metabolism in the ruminant. J. Biol. Chem. 239, 89-93.
27. Stams, A. J. M. (1994). Metabolic interactions between anaerobic-bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 66, 271-294. doi: 10.1007/BF00871644
28. Stevenson, D. M., and Weimer, P. J. (2007). Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75, 165-174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0802-y
29. Theodorou, M. K., Mennim, G., Davies, D. R., Zhu, W. Y., Trinci, A. P., and Brookman, J. L. (1996). Anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of mammalian herbivores and their potential for exploitation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 55, 913-926. doi: 10.1079/PNS19960088
30. Weimer, P. J. (1996). Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster? J. Dairy Sci. 79, 1496-1502. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76509-8
31. Weimer, P. J., Russell, J. B., and Muck, R. E. (2009). Lessons from the cow: what the ruminant animal can teach us about consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol. 100, 5323-5331. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.075