Approaches to IR: The relationship between Anglo-Saxon historiography and crosscommunity comparison

International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 225-252

  Holden, Gerard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905134622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203088142     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Albert, M. (1996) Fallen der (Welt-)Ordnung. Internationale Beziehungen und ihre Theorien zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
2. Albert, M. (1999) 'Observing World Politics: Luhmann's Systems Theory of Society and International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28(2): 239-65.
3. Albert, M. (2002) Zur Politik der Weltgesellschaft. Identität und Recht im Kontext internationaler Vergesellschaftung, Weilerswist: Velbrueck Wissenschaft.
4. Ashworth, L.M. (2002) 'Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations', International Relations 16(1): 33-51.
5. Aydinli, E. and Mathews, J. (2000) 'Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations', International Studies Perspectives 1(3): 289-303.
6. Baynes, K. (2001) 'Deliberative Politics, the Public Sphere, and Global Democracy', in R. Wyn Jones (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 161-70.
7. Bell, D.S.A. (2003) 'Political Theory and the Functions of Intellectual History: A Response to Emmanuel Navon', Review of International Studies 29(1): 151-60.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Homo academicus, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1990) 'Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées', Romanistische Zeitschrift für Literaturgeschichte/Cahiers d'histoire des Littératures Romanes 2(2-3): 1-10.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1996) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1999) 'The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas', in R. Shusterman (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 220-8.
12. Brown, C. (2000) 'International Political Theory-A British Political Science?', British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(1): 114-23.
13. Buzan, B. (2001) 'The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR', Review of International Studies 27(3): 471-88.
14. Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. and Simmons, B.A. (eds) (2002) Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage.
15. Castiglione, D. and Hampsher-Monk, I. (eds) (2001) The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Chan, G. (1999) Chinese Perspectives on International Relations: A Framework for Analysis, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
17. Chan, S., Mandaville, P. and Bleiker, R. (eds) (2001) The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
18. Checkel, J.T. (2001) 'Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change', International Organization 55(3): 553-88.
19. Cohen, R. (2001) 'Living and Teaching Across Cultures', International Studies Perspectives 2(2): 151-60.
20. Crawford, R.M.A. (2001) 'Where Have All the Theorists Gone-Gone to Britain, Every One? A Story of Two Parochialisms in International Relations', in R.M.A. Crawford and D.S. Jarvis (eds) International Relations-Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 221-42.
21. Drulák, P. and Druláková, R. (2000) 'International Relations in the Czech Republic: A Review of the Discipline', Journal of International Relations and Development 3(3): 256-82.
22. Drulák, P. and Königová, L. (2002) 'The Discipline of International Relations in Central and Eastern Europe', European Political Science 1(3): 47-53.
23. Fierke, K.M. and Jørgensen, K.E. (eds) (2001) Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe.
24. Friedrichs, J. (2001) 'International Relations Theory in France', Journal of International Relations and Development 4(2): 118-37.
25. Geeraerts, G. and Jeng, M. (2001) 'International Relations Theory in China', Global Society 15(3): 251-76.
26. Groom, A.J.R. and Mandaville, P. (2001) 'Hegemony and Autonomy in International Relations: The Continental Experience', in R.M.A. Crawford and D.S. Jarvis (eds) International Relations-Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 151-65.
27. Gunnell, J.G. (1993) The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
28. Gunnell, J.G. (1998) The Orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science, and Politics, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29. Guzzini, S. (1998) Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, London: Routledge.
30. Guzzini, S. (2000a) 'Making Sense of Constructivism in International Relations', in K. Segbers and K. Imbusch The Globalization of Eastern Europe, Münster: Lit-Verlag, pp. 53-76.
31. Guzzini, S. (2000b) 'A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations', European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147-82.
32. Habermas, J. (1992) 'Handlungen, Sprechakte, sprachlich vermittelte Interaktionen und Lebenswelt', in Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 63-104.
33. Habermas, J. (1998) 'Die postnationale Konstellation und die Zukunft der Demokratie', Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 7: 804-17.
34. Habermas, J. (2002a) 'Fundamentalismus und Terror. Antworten auf Fragen zum 11. September 2001', Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 2: 165-78.
35. Habermas, J. (2002b) 'Letter to America', The Nation 16 December.
36. Halliday, F. (1999) 'The Chimera of the "International University" ', International Affairs 75(1): 99-120.
37. Hampsher-Monk, I. (2001) 'The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought', in D. Castiglione and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds) The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159-74.
38. Hellmann, G., Wolf, K.D. and Zürn, M. (eds) (2003) Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
39. Hitzel-Cassagnes, T. (2002) 'Warten auf Godot: Anmerkungen zur Konzeptualisierung von Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 9(1): 139-54.
40. Hoffman, M. (1989) 'Critical Theory and the Inter-paradigm Debate', in H.C. Dyer and L. Mangasarian (eds) The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art, London: Macmillan, pp. 60-86.
41. Hoffmann, S. (1977) 'An American Social Science: International Relations', Daedalus 106(3): 41-60.
42. Holden, G. (2001) 'The Politer Kingdoms of the Globe: Context and Comparison in the Intellectual History of IR', Global Society 15(1): 27-51.
43. Holden, G. (2002) 'Who Contextualizes the Contextualizers? Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse', Review of International Studies 28(2): 253-70.
44. Holzinger, K. (2001) 'Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Anmerkungen zu einigen irreführenden Dichotomien', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8(2): 243-86.
45. Honneth, A. (2001) 'Universalismus aus dem Geist eines demokratischen Patriotismus. Jürgen Habermas als politischer Intellektuelle', Forschung Frankfurt 4: 4-9.
46. Honneth, A. (ed.) (2002) Befreiung aus der Mündigkeit. Paradoxien des gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
47. Humrich, C. (2003) 'Kritische Theorie', in Siegfried Schieder and Manuela Spindler (eds) Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen, Opladen: UTB/Leske & Budrich, pp. 421-47.
48. Inoguchi, T. and Bacon, P. (2001) 'The Study of International Relations in Japan: Towards a More International Discipline', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1(1): 1-20.
49. Jahn, B. (1998) 'One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism', Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(3): 613-41.
50. Jenkins, R. (1992) Pierre Bourdieu, London and New York: Routledge.
51. Jones, D.L. (2001) 'Creating Cosmopolitan Power: International Mediation as Communicative Action', in R. Wyn Jones (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 171-87.
52. Jørgensen, K.E. (2000) 'Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret', European Journal of International Relations 6(1): 9-42.
53. Keck, O. (1995) 'Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ist eine Verbindung von Rational-Choice-Theorie und Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns möglich?', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 2(1): 5-48.
54. Linklater, A. (1996) 'Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State', European Journal of International Relations 2(1): 77-103.
55. Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
56. Linklater, A. (2001) 'The Changing Contours of Critical International Relations Theory', in R. Wyn Jones Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 23-43.
57. Little, R. (1999) 'Historiography and International Relations', Review of International Studies 25(2): 291-9.
58. Long, D. and Schmidt, B.C. (2004) 'Introduction', in D. Long and B.C. Schmidt (eds) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations, Albany, State University of New York (manuscript).
59. Lucarelli, S. and Menotti, R. (2002) 'No-constructivists' Land: International Relations in Italy in the 1990s', Journal of International Relations and Development 5(2): 114-42.
60. Lynch, M. (2002) 'Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement', European Journal of International Relations 8(2): 187-230.
61. Mandaville, P. (2001) Transnational Muslim Politics: Reimagining the umma, London and New York: Routledge.
62. Meyer, J.-B., Kaplan, D. and Charum, J. (2001) 'Scientific Nomadism and the New Geopolitics of Knowledge', International Social Science Journal 168 (June): 309-21.
63. Müller, H. (1994) 'Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln. Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1(1): 15-44.
64. Neufeld, M. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Neufeld, M. (2001) 'What's Critical About Critical International Relations Theory?', in R. Wyn Jones (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 127-45.
66. Neufeld, M. and Healy, T. (2001) 'Above the "American Discipline": A Canadian Perspective on Epistemological Diversity', in R.M.A. Crawford and D.S. Jarvis (eds) International Relations-Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 243-53.
67. Palmer, N.D. (1980) 'The Study of International Relations in the United States: Perspectives of Half a Century', International Studies Quarterly 24(3): 343-64.
68. Porter, T. (2001) 'Can There Be National Perspectives in Inter(National) Relations?', in R.M.A. Crawford and D.S. Jarvis (eds) International Relations-Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 131-47.
69. Puchala, D.J. (1997) 'Some Non-Western Perspectives on International Relations', Journal of Peace Research 34(2): 129-34.
70. Risse, T. (2000) ' "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics', International Organization 54(1): 1-39.
71. Risse, T. (2003) 'Konstruktivismus, Rationalismus und Theorien Internationaler Beziehungen-warum empirisch nichts so heiß gegessen wird, wie es theoretisch gekocht wurde', in G. Hellmann, K.D. Wolf and M. Zürn (eds) Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 99-132.
72. Runciman, D. (2001) 'History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline', British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3(1): 84-104.
73. Schmidt, B.C. (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany: State University of New York Press.
74. Schmidt, B.C. (2002a) 'On the History and Historiography of International Relations', in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 3-22.
75. Schmidt, B.C. (2002b) 'Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism', International Relations 16(1): 9-31.
76. Sergounin, A.A. (2000) 'Russian Post-Communist Foreign Policy at the Crossroads: Changing Paradigms', Journal of International Relations and Development 3(3): 216-55.
77. Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics, Volume 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Smith, S. (1995) 'The Self-images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory', in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1-37.
79. Smith, S. (2000) 'The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?', British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3): 374-402.
80. Söllner, A. (2002) 'Adorno und die politische Kultur der frühen Bundesrepublik', Mittelweg 36 11(2): 37-52.
81. Sylvester, C. (2002) Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Thies, C.G. (2002) 'Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate', European Journal of International Relations 8(2): 147-85.
83. Tickner, A.B. (2003) 'Hearing Latin American Voices in IR Studies', International Studies Perspectives 4(4): 325-50.
84. Tsygankov, A. and Tsygankov, P. (1999) 'Pluralism or Isolation of Civilisations? Russia's Foreign Policy Discourse and the Reception of Huntington's Paradigm of the Post-Cold War World', Geopolitics 4(3): 47-72.
85. Vitalis, R. (2000) 'The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(2): 331-56.
86. Wæver, O. (1998) 'The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations', International Organization 52(4): 687-727.
87. Wæver, O. (2003) 'The Structure of the IR Discipline: A Proto-comparative Analysis', paper prepared for the annual convention of ISA, Portland panel on 'Knowledge About IR Knowledge: The Discipline According to the Sociology of Science'.
88. Whitley, R. (2000) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2nd edn).
89. Wilson, P. (1998) 'The Myth of the "First Great Debate"', Review of International Studies 24(Special Issue): 1-15.
90. Wyn Jones, R. (1999) Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.
91. Wyn Jones, R. (ed.) (2001) Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.
92. Zhang, Y. (2003) 'The "English School" in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and their Diffusion', European Journal of International Relations 9(1): 87-114.