Developing an information literacy assessment rubric: A case study of collaboration, process, and outcomes

Communications in Information Literacy

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 131-144

  Gola, Christina H ^a   Ke, Irene ^a   Creelman, Kerry M ^a   Vaillancourt, Shawn P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905110687     PISSN: 19335954     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.157     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Association of College & Research Libraries. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved January, 2013, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
2. Diller, K. R., & Phelps, S. F. (2008). Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, Oh My! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 8(1), 75-89. doi:10.1353/pla.2008.0000
3. Helvoort, J. (2010). A scoring rubric for performance assessment of information literacy in Dutch Higher Education. Journal of Information Literacy, 4(1), 22-39. Retrieved April 26, 2013 from http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/PRA-V4-I1-2010-2/1444
4. Hoffmann, D., & LaBonte, K. (2012). Meeting Information Literacy outcomes: Partnering with faculty to create effective Information Literacy assessment. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 70-85. Retrieved April 26, 2013 from http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/LLC-V6-I2-2012-1/1725
5. Hoffman, D., & Wallace, A. (2009). Information competence assessment using first year and upper division writing samples. Proceedings of the 2008 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, Seattle, WA. 473-481.
6. Knight, L. A. (2006). Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 43-55. doi: 10.1108/00907320510631571
7. Oakleaf, M. (2009). Using rubrics to assess information literacy: An examination of methodology and interrater reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(5), 969-983. doi: 10.1002/asi.21030
8. Oakleaf, M. (2008). Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of Information Literacy assessment approaches. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 8(3), 233-253. doi: 10.1353/pla.0.0011
9. Oakleaf, M., Millet, M. S., & Kraus, L. (2011). All together now: Getting faculty, A administrators, and staff engaged in Information Literacy assessment. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 11(3), 831-852. doi: 10.1353/pla.2011.0035
10. UH at a Glance. Retrieved April, 2013, from http://www.uh.edu/about/uh-glance/.