Aerobic interval training vs. Moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sports Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 687-700

  Pattyn, Nele ^a   Coeckelberghs, Ellen ^a   Buys, Roselien ^a   Cornelissen, Véronique A ^a   Vanhees, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; META ANALYSIS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE THERAPY; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HUMANS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; RISK FACTORS; STROKE VOLUME; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 84905101020     PISSN: 01121642     EISSN: 11792035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0158-x     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, et al. European cardiovascular disease statistics: Edition 2012. http://www.ehnheart. org/cvd-statistics/cvd- statistics-2012.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2012.
2. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682-92.
3. Vanhees L, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Prognostic significance of peak exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(2):358-63.
4. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, et al. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793-801.
5. Shephard CW, While AE. Cardiac rehabilitation and quality of life: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(6):755-71.
6. Oldridge N. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: meta-analysis outcomes revisited. Future Cardiol. 2012;8(5):729-51.
7. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH. Effects of endurance training on blood pressure, blood pressure-regulating mechanisms, and cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension. 2005;46(4):667-75.
8. Vanhees L, Rauch B, Piepoli M, on behalf of the writing group of the EACPR, et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (part III). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(6):1333-56.
9. Vanhees L, Stevens A, Schepers D, et al. Determinants of the effects of physical training and of the complications requiring resuscitation during exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004;11(4):304-12.
10. Rankin AJ, Rankin AC, MacIntyre P, et al. Walk or run? Is highintensity exercise more effective than moderate-intensity exercise at reducing cardiovascular risk? Scott Med J. 2012;57(2):99-102.
11. Arena R, Myers J, Forman DE, et al. Should high-intensity-aerobic interval training become the clinical standard in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(1):95-105.
12. Cornish AK, Broadbent S, Cheema BS. Interval training for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(4):579-89.
13. O'Donovan G, Owen A, Bird SR, et al. Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary heart disease risk factors following 24 wk of moderate- or high-intensity exercise of equal energy cost. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98(5):1619-25.
14. Guiraud T, Nigam A, Gremeaux V, et al. High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation. Sports Med. 2012;42(7): 587-605.
15. Wisløff U, Støylen A, Loennechen JP, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007;115(24):3086-94.
16. Smart NA, Dieberg G, Giallauria F. Intermittent versus continuous exercise training in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(2):352-8.
17. Haykowsky MJ, Timmons MP, Kruger C, et al. Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(10):1466-9.
18. Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004;11(3):216-22.
19. Warburton DE, McKenzie DC, Haykowsky MJ, et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(9): 1080-4.
20. Rocco EA, Prado DM, Silva AG, et al. Effect of continuous and interval exercise training on the PETCO2 response during a graded exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinics. 2012;67(6):623-7.
21. Moholdt TT, Amundsen BH, Rustad LA, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J. 2009;158(6):1031-7.
22. Dimopoulos S, Anastatiou-Nana M, Sakellariou D, et al. Effects of exercise rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(1):67-73.
23. Vanhees L, Geladas N, Hansen D, on behalf of the writing group of the EACPR, et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: recommendations from the EACPR (part II). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(5):1005-33.
24. The George Institute for Global Health and the University of Sydney. Physiotherapy Evidence Database; 2012. http://www. pedro.org.au/english/ downloads/pedro-scale/. Accessed 18 Oct 2012.
25. De Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129-33.
26. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713-21.
27. Follman D, Elliott P, Suh I, et al. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(7):769-73.
28. Moholdt T, Aamot IL, Granøien I, et al. Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(1):33-44.
29. Dersimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-88.
30. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Fixed effects vs. random effects metaanalysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge. Int J Sel Assess. 2000;8(4):275-92.
31. Roditis P, Dimopoulos S, Sakellariou D, et al. The effects of exercise training on the kinetics of oxygen uptake in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007; 14(2):304-11.
32. Amundsen BH, Rognmo Ø, Hatlen-Rebhan G, et al. Highintensity aerobic exercise improves diastolic function in coronary artery disease. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008;42(2):110-7.
33. Fu TC, Wang CH, Lin PS, et al. Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(1):41-50.
34. Iellamo F, Manzi V, Caminiti G, et al. Dose-response relationship of baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability to individually- tailored exercise training in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(2):334-9.
35. Freyssin C, Verkindt C, Prieur F, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: effect of an 8-week, high intensity interval training versus continuous training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):1359-64.
36. Iellamo F, Manzi V, Caminiti G, et al. Matched dose interval and continuous exercise training induce similar cardiorespiratory and metabolic adaptations in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2561-5.
37. Moholdt T, Aamot IL, Granøien I, et al. Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study of usual care exercise training versus aerobic interval training after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2011;152(3):388-90.
38. Smart NA, Steele M. A comparison of 16 weeks of continuous vs intermittent exercise training in chronic heart failure patients. Congest Heart Fail. 2012;18(4):205-11.
39. Currie KD, Dubberley JB, McKelvie RS, et al. Low-volume, high-intensity interval training in patients with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(8):1436-42.
40. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104(14): 1694-740.
41. Mezzani A, Agostoni P, Cohen-Solal A, et al. Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009; 16(3):249-67.
42. Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Savage PD, et al. Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2008;156(2):292-300.
43. Hwang CL, Wu YT, Chou CH. Effect of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and metabolic risk factors in people with cardiometabolic disorders: a meta-analysis. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31(6):378-85.
44. Tomczak CR, Thompson RB, Paterson I, et al. Effect of acute high-intensity interval exercise on postexercise biventricular function in mild heart failure. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(2): 398-406.
45. Nechwatal RM, Duck C, Gruber G. Physical training as interval or continuous training in chronic heart failure for improving functional capacity, hemodynamics and quality of life: a controlled study. Z Kardiol. 2002;91(4):328-37.
46. Tjønna AE, Lee SJ, Rognmo Ø, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation. 2008;118(4):346-54.
47. Guazzi M, Vitelli A, Arena R. The effect of exercise training on plasma NT-pro-BNP levels and its correlation with improved exercise ventilator efficiency in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2012;158(2):290-1.
48. Van de Veire NR, Van Laethem C, Philippé J, et al. VE/VCO2 slope and oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease and intermediate peakVO2. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(6):916-23.
49. Sarullo FM, Fazio G, Brusca I, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure: prognostic comparison from peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2010;26(4):127-34.
50. Cahalin LP, Chase P, Arena R, et al. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(1):79-94.
51. Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V, et al. EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement: clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):2917-27.
52. Hansen D, Dendale P, van Loon LJ, Meeusen R. The impact of training modalities on the clinical benefits of exercise intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sports Med. 2010;40(11):921-40.
53. Thompson PD, Franklin BA, Balady GJ, et al. Exercise and acute cardiovascular events placing the risks into perspective: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2358-68.
54. Rognmo Ø, Moholdt T, Bakken H, et al. Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation. 2012;126(12):1436-40.
55. Fagard RH, Staessen JA, Thijs L. Advantages and disadvantages of the meta-analysis approach. J Hypertens Suppl. 1996;14(2):S9-12.