HyperModules: Identifying clinically and phenotypically significant network modules with disease mutations for biomarker discovery

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 2230-2232

  Leung, Alvin ^a   Bader, Gary D ^a   Reimand, Jüri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; NEOPLASM; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MUTATION; NEOPLASMS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84905011411     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu172     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Altmae, S. et al. (2012) Research resource: Interactome of human embryo implantation: Identification of gene expression pathways, regulation, and integrated regulatory networks. Mol. Endocrinol., 26, 203-217.
2. Barabasi, A.L. et al. (2011) Network medicine: A network-based approach to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 12, 56-68.
3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. (2008) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature, 474, 609-615.
4. Chuang, H.Y. et al. (2007) Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 140.
5. Gilman, S.R. et al. (2011) Rare de novo variants associated with autism implicate a large functional network of genes involved in formation and function of synapses. Neuron, 70, 898-907.
6. Gonzalez-Perez, A. et al. (2013) Computational approaches to identify functional genetic variants in cancer genomes. Nat. Methods, 10, 723-729.
7. Hardy, J. and Singleton, A. (2009) Genomewide association studies and human disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 360, 1759-1768.
8. Hofree, M. et al. (2013) Network-based stratification of tumor mutations. Nat. Methods, 10, 1108-1115.
9. Reimand, J. and Bader, G.D. (2013) Systematic analysis of somatic mutations in phosphorylation signaling predicts novel cancer drivers. Mol. Syst. Biol., 9, 637.
10. Reimand, J. et al. (2008) GraphWeb: Mining heterogeneous biological networks for gene modules with functional significance. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W452-W459.
11. Reimand, J. et al. (2013) The mutational landscape of phosphorylation signaling in cancer. Sci. Rep., 3, 2651.
12. Shannon, P. et al. (2003) Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res., 13, 2498-2504.
13. Turner, B. et al. (2010) iRefWeb: Interactive analysis of consolidated protein interaction data and their supporting evidence. Database (Oxford), 2010, baq023.
14. Vandin, F. et al. (2011) Algorithms for detecting significantly mutated pathways in cancer. J. Comput. Biol., 18, 507-522.
15. Vandin, F. et al. (2012) Discovery of mutated subnetworks associated with clinical data in cancer. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 1, 55-66.
16. Vogelstein, B. et al. (2013) Cancer genome landscapes. Science, 339, 1546-1558.
17. Weinstein, J.N. et al. (2013) The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat. Genet., 45, 1113-1120.
18. Wu, G. and Stein, L. (2012) A network module-based method for identifying cancer prognostic signatures. Genome Biol., 13, R112.
19. Zhang, W. et al. (2013) Network-based survival analysis reveals subnetwork signatures for predicting outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1002975.