Emerging pattern mining to aid toxicological knowledge discovery

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1864-1879

  Sherhod, Richard ^a,d   Judson, Philip N ^b   Hanser, Thierry ^c   Vessey, Jonathan D ^c   Webb, Samuel J ^c   Gillet, Valerie J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b Judson Consulting Service   (United Kingdom)

^c LHASA LIMITED   (United Kingdom)

^d Vernalis PLC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; TOXICITY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION; CHEMICAL CLASS; CONTRAST PATTERNS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; EMERGING PATTERNS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; STRUCTURAL FRAGMENTS; TOXICITY PREDICTIONS;

DATA MINING;

POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; POTASSIUM CHANNEL HERG;

ALGORITHM; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; BIOASSAY; DATA MINING; MUTAGEN TESTING; PROCEDURES; TOXICOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; ETHER-A-GO-GO POTASSIUM CHANNELS; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 84904980910     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci5001828     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cronin, M. T. D.; Madden, J. C. In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2010.
2. Dearden, J. C. In Silico Prediction of Drug Toxicity J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 119-127
3. Marchant, C. A. Computational Toxicology: A Tool for All Industries WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 424-434
4. Smithing, M. P.; Darvas, F. Hazardexpert-an Expert System for Predicting Chemical Toxicity ACS Symp. Ser. 1992, 484, 191-200
5. Saiakhov, R.; Chakravarti, S.; Klopman, G. Effectiveness of Case Ultra Expert System in Evaluating Adverse Effects of Drugs Mol. Inf. 2013, 32, 87-97
6. Nicolaou, C. A.; Tamura, S. Y.; Kelley, B. P.; Bassett, S. I.; Nutt, R. F. Analysis of Large Screening Data Sets Via Adaptively Grown Phylogenetic-Like Trees J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1069-1079
7. Harper, G.; Bravi, G. S.; Pickett, S. D.; Hussain, J.; Green, D. V. S. The Reduced Graph Descriptor in Virtual Screening and Data-Driven Clustering of High-Throughput Screening Data J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2145-2156
8. Takigawa, I.; Mamitsuka, H. Graph Mining: Procedure, Application to Drug Discovery and Recent Advances Drug Discovery Today 2013, 18, 50-57
9. Kazius, J.; Nijssen, S.; Kok, J.; Bäck, T.; Ijzerman, A. P. Substructure Mining Using Elaborate Chemical Representation J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 597-605
10. Lozano, S.; Poezevara, G.; Halm-Lemeille, M. P.; Lescot-Fontaine, E.; Lepailleur, A.; Bissell-Siders, R.; Crémilleux, B.; Rault, S.; Cuissart, B.; Bureau, R. Introduction of Jumping Fragments in Combination with QSARs for the Assessment of Classification in Ecotoxicology J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1330-1339
11. Poezevara, G.; Cuissart, B.; Crémilleux, B. Extracting and Summarizing the Frequent Emerging Graph Patterns from a Dataset of Graphs J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 2011, 37, 333-353
12. Ferrari, T.; Cattaneo, D.; Gini, G.; Bakhtyari, N. G.; Manganaro, A.; Benfenati, E. Automatic Knowledge Extraction from Chemical Structures: The Case of Mutagenicity Prediction SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2013, 24, 631-649
13. Jullian, N.; Afshar, M. Novel Rule-Based Method for Multi-Parametric Multi-Objective Decision Support in Lead Optimization Using Kem Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2008, 4, 35-45
14. Wolff, K. E. In A First Course in Formal Concept Analysis-How to Understand Line Diagrams, The 7th Conference on the Scientific Use of Statistical Software, Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Gustav Fischer Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; pp 429-438.
15. Carpineto, C.; Romano, G. In Galois: An Order-Theoretic Approach to Conceptual Clustering, Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Amherst, MA, USA, 1993; Morgan Kaufmann: Amherst, MA, USA, 1993; pp 33-40.
16. Sherhod, R.; Gillet, V. J.; Judson, P. N.; Vessey, J. D. Automating Knowledge Discovery for Toxicity Prediction Using Jumping Emerging Pattern Mining J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 3074-3087
17. Dong, G.; Li, J. Efficient Mining of Emerging Patterns: Discovering Trends and Differences. In The Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Chaudhuri, S.,; Fayyad, U.; Madigan, D., Eds.; Association for Computing Machinery Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; pp 43-52.
18. Auer, J.; Bajorath, J. Emerging Chemical Patterns: A New Methodology for Molecular Classification and Compound Selection J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2502-2514
19. Namasivayam, V.; Hu, Y.; Balfer, J.; Bajorath, J. Classification of Compounds with Distinct or Overlapping Multi-Target Activities and Diverse Molecular Mechanisms Using Emerging Chemical Patterns J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1272-1281
20. Garcia-Borroto, M.; Francisco Martinez-Trinidad, J.; Ariel Carrasco-Ochoa, J. A New Emerging Pattern Mining Algorithm and Its Application in Supervised Classification. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Pt I, Proceedings; Zaki, M. J.; Yu, J. X.; Ravindran, B.; Pudi, V., Eds.; 2010; Vol. 6118, pp 150-157.
21. Fan, H.; Ramamohanarao, K. Fast Discovery and the Generalization of Strong Jumping Emerging Patterns for Building Compact and Accurate Classifiers IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006, 18, 721-737
22. Hansen, K.; Mika, S.; Schroeter, T.; Sutter, A.; ter Laak, A.; Steger-Hartmann, T.; Heinrich, N.; Mueller, K.-R. Benchmark Data Set for in Silico Prediction of Ames Mutagenicity J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 2077-2081
23. PubChem. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assay/assay.cgi?q=r&version= 1.2&reqid=2831879572223393786 (accessed May 21, 2014).
24. ChemAxon Kft Máramaros köz 3/a, Budapest, 1037 Hungary.
25. Berthold, M. R.; Cebron, N.; Dill, F.; Gabriel, T. R.; Kotter, T.; Meinl, T.; Ohl, P.; Sieb, C.; Thiel, K.; Wiswedel, B. Knime: The Konstanz Information Miner Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications 2008, 319-326
26. Lhasa Limited Vitic Nexus 2013, 23 Blenheim Terrace, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9HD, UK.
27. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73
28. Daylight Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., 120 Vantis-Suite 550, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA. www.daylight.com at http://www.daylight.com (accessed May 21, 2014).
29. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Similarity Searching Using Reduced Graphs J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 338-345
30. Benigni, R. The Benigni/Bossa Rulebase for Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity-a Module of Toxtree; European Commission Report EUR, 23241: 2008.
31. Aronov, A. M. Predictive in Silico Modeling for Herg Channel Blockers Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 149-155
32. Mitcheson, J. S.; Chen, J.; Lin, M.; Culberson, C.; Sanguinetti, M. C. A Structural Basis for Drug-Induced Long Qt Syndrome Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97, 12329-12333
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Dsstox. http://www.epa.gov/ncct/dsstox/index.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
34. Morgan, H. L. The Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures-a Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 107-113
35. Rogers, D.; Hahn, M. Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 742-754