Analysis of large screening data sets via adaptively grown phylogenetic-like trees

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1069-1079

  Nicolaou, C A ^a   Tamura, S Y ^a   Kelley, B P ^a   Bassett, S I ^a   Nutt, R F ^a  

^a Bioreason Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG DISCOVERY;

ALGORITHMS; DATA REDUCTION; DRUG PRODUCTS; SET THEORY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; PHYLOGENY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0036708527     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci010244i     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnard, J.M.; Downs, G.M. Clustering of chemical structures on the basis of two-dimensional similarity measures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 644-649.
2. Willett, P.; Winterman, V.; Bawden, D. Implementation of non-hierarchic cluster analysis methods in chemical information systems: Selection of compounds for biological testing and clustering of substructure search output. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1986, 26, 109-118.
3. Shemetulskis, N.E.; Dunbar, J.B.; Dunbar, B.W.; Moreland, D.W.; Humblet, C.H. Enhancing the diversity of a corporate database using chemical database clustering and analysis. J. Comput-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 407-416.
4. Engels, M.F.M.; Thielemans, T.; Verbinnen, D.; Tollenaere, J.P.; Verbeeck, R. CerBeruS: A System Supporting the Sequential Screening Process. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 241-245.
5. Stanton, D.T.; Morris, T.W.; Roychoudhury, S.; Parker, C.N. Application of Nearest-Neighbor and Cluster Analyses in Pharmaceutical Lead Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 21-27.
6. Menard, P.R.; Lewis, R.A.; Mason, J.S. Rational Screening Set Design and Compound Selection: Cascaded Clustering. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 497-505.
7. Rusinko, A., III; Farmen, M.W.; Lambert, C.G.; Brown, P.L.; Young, S.S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
8. Roberts, G.; Myatt, G.J.; Johnson, W.P.; Cross, K.P.; Blower, P.E., Jr. LeadScope: Software for Exploring Large Sets of Screening Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1302-1314.
9. Jain, A.K.; Dubes, R.C. Algorithms for Clustering Data; Prentice Hall Advanced Reference Series: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
10. Jarvis, R.A.; Patrick, E.A. Clustering using a similarity measure based on shared near neighbors. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1973, C-22(11), 1025-1034.
11. Chen, X.; Rusinko A., III; Young, S.S. Recursive Partitioning Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1054-1062.
12. Rhee, M.A. van; Stocker, J.; Printzenhoff, D.; Creech, C.; Wagoner, P.K.; Spear, K.L. Retrospective Analysis of an Experimental High-Throughput Screening Data Set by Recursive Partitioning. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 267-277.
13. Ladd, B. Intuitive Data Analysis: The next high-throughput technology demands advanced information tools. Modern Drug Discovery 2000, 3(1), 46-52.
14. Brown, R.D.; Martin, Y.C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
15. Hansch, C.; Fujita, T. ρ-σ-π analysis - A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1616-1626.
16. Frank R.B. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies Using Gaussian Processes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 830-835.
17. Gao, H.; Williams, C.; Labute, P.; Bajorath, J. Binary Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 164-168.
18. Chen, X.; Rusinko A., III; Tropsha, A.; Young, S.S. Automated Pharmacophore Identification for Large Chemical Data Sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 887-896.
19. Willet, P.; Barnard, J.M.; Downs, G.M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 39, 983-996.
20. Morize, I.; Menard, P.R.; Mason, J.S.; Bauerschmidt, S. Chemistry space metrics in diversity analysis, library design, and compound selection, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1204-1213.
21. Matter, H.; Potter, T. Comparing 3d pharmacophore triplets and 2d fingerprints for selecting diverse compounds subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1211-1225.
22. Fisanick, W. The Chemical Abstracts Service Generic Chemical (Markush) Structure Storage and Retrieval Capability. 1. Basic Concepts. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1990, 30, 145-154.
23. MDL Information Systems, Inc., San Leandro, CA. Home page: http://www.mdli.com/.
24. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., Mission Viejo, CA. Home page: http://www.daylight.com/.
25. Barnard Chemical Information Ltd., Sheffield, U.K. Home page: http://www.bci1.demon.co.uk/.
26. Wild, D.J.; Blankley, C.J. Comparison of 2d fingerprint types and hierarchy level selection methods for structural grouping using wards clustering. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 155-162.
27. Wagener, M.; Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J. Assessing similarity and diversity of combinatorial libraries by spatial autocorrelation functions and neural networks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34(23), 2674-2677.
28. Rhodes, N.; Willett, P.; Dunbar, J.B.; Humblet, C.H. Bit-string methods for selective compound acquisition. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 210-214.
29. Downs, G.M.; Willett, P.; Fisanick, W. Similarity Searching and Clustering of Chemical-Structure Databases Using Molecular Property Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1094-1102.
30. Godden, J.W.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Combinatorial preferences affect molecular similarity/diversity calculations using binary fingerprints and tanimoto coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 163-166.
31. Flower, D.R. On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386.
32. MacCuish J.D.; Nicolaou C.A.; MacCuish N.J. Ties in proximity and clustering compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41(1): 134-146.
33. Nicolaou, C.A.; MacCuish, J.D.; Tamura, S.Y. A new multidomain clustering algorithm for lead discovery that exploits ties in proximities. In Rational Approaches to Drug Design; Proceedings from the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, Dusseldorf, Aug. 27-Sept. 1, 2000; Prous Scientific.
34. Bioreason, Inc., home page: http://www.bioreason.com/.
35. Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps, 2nd ed; Springer: Heidelberg, 1997.
36. Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J. The Determination of Maximum Common Substructures by a Genetic Algorithm: Application in Synthesis Design and for the Structural Analysis of Biological Activity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1189-1192.
37. Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, home page: http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/.
38. Weislow, O.S.; Kiser, R.; Fine, D.L.; Bader, J.; Shoemaker, R.H.; Boyd, M.R. New soluble-formazan assay for HIV-1 cytopathic effects: application to high-flux screening of synthetic and natural products for AIDS-antiviral activity. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989, 81, 577-86.