What's in store: Lessons from implementing CCS

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 9, Issue , 2012, Pages 402-409

  Ashworth, Peta ^a   Bradbury, Judith ^a   Wade, Sarah ^c   Ynke Feenstra, C F J ^d,f   Greenberg, Sallie ^e   Hund, Gretchen ^b   Mikunda, Thomas ^d  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c AJW Inc   (United States)

^d TNO   (Netherlands)

^e ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^f FYnergy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; CCS; Communication; Engagement; Public perceptions; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMMUNICATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR; EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION; ENGAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS; STAKEHOLDERS;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMMUNICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PERCEPTION; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLLUTION POLICY; RESEARCH WORK; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

AUSTRALIA; NETHERLANDS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861677618     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ashworth P., Boughen N., Mayhew M., Millar F. From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:426-433.
2. Ashworth, P., Bradbury, J., Feenstra, C.F.J., Greenberg, S., Hund, G., Mikunda, T., Wade, S., 2010b. Communication, Project Planning and Management for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects: An International Comparison. EP104273. CSIRO, Pullenvale, Australia.
3. Ashworth, P., Rodriguez, S., Miller, A., 2010c. Case Study of the CO2CRC Otway Project. EP103388. CSIRO, Pullenvale, Australia.
4. Ashworth, P., Rodriguez, S., Miller, A., 2010d. Case Study of the ZeroGen Project. EP103387. CSIRO, Pullenvale, Australia.
5. Bradbury, J., Branch, K., Malone, E.L., 2003. An Evaluation of DOE-EM Public Participation Programs. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830. PNNL-14200.
6. Bradbury J., Ray I., Peterson T., Wade S., Wong-Parodi G., Feldpausch A. Social factors in shaping perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the U.S. Procedia 1, Proceedings of GHGT-9 2009, 4664-4672. Elsevier.
7. Bradbury, J., Wade, S., 2010. Case study of the Carson CCS project. Prepared for CSIRO on Behalf of the Global CCS Institute: International Comparison of Public Outreach Practices Associated with Large Scale CCS Projects.
8. Bradbury J., Greenberg S., Wade S. Communicating the Risks of CCS 2011, Wade LLC, Washington, DC. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/communicating-risks-ccs.
9. Bradbury J. Public understanding of and engagement with CCS. The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding Representation, Governance and Innovation 2012, Routledge, London and New York. N. Markusson, S. Shackley, B. Evar (Eds.).
10. Brunsting S., de Best-Waldhober M., Feenstra C.F.J., Mikunda T. Stakeholder participation and onshore CCS: lessons from the Dutch CCS case Barendrecht. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6376-6383.
11. Brunsting, S., van Bree, B., Feenstra, C.F.J., Hekkenberg, M., 2011b. Public perceptions of low carbon energy technologies. Outcomes from a Dutch Large Group Workshop. Prepared for CSIRO on Behalf of the Global CCS Institute. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, Petten, The Netherlands.
12. Breukers, S., Pol, M., Upham, P., Lis, A., Desbarats, J., Roberts, T., Duetschke, E., Oltra, C., Brunsting, S., de Best-Waldhober, M., Reiner, D., Riesch, H., 2011. Engagement and Communication Strategies for CCS Projects: Gaps between Current and Desired Practiced and Exemplary Strategies. Deliverable 3.1 of the NearCO2 Project, Funded by the EC under FP7. Accessed from: http://www.communicationnearco2.eu/fileadmin/communicationnearco2/user/docs/WP3.1_Report_Final.pdf.
13. Desbarats J., Upham P., Riesch H., Reiner D., Brunsting S., de Best-Waldhober M., Duetschke E., Oltra C., Sala R., McLachlan C. Review of the Public Participation Practices for CCS and Non-CCS Projects in Europe 2010, Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels.
14. Ding D., Maibach E.W., Zhao X., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change 2011, 1:462-466.
15. Feenstra C.F.J., Mikunda T., Brunsting D. What Happened in Barendrecht? Case Study on the Planned Onshore Carbon Dioxide Storage in Barendrecht, The Netherlands 2010, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, Petten, The Netherlands.
16. Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Journal of Risk Analysis 1995, 15:137-145.
17. FutureGen Results of Site Offeror Proposal Evaluation: Submitted to the US DOE 2006, FutureGen Alliance, pp. 14-15.
18. Hammond, J., Shackley, S., 2010. Towards a Public Communication and Engagement Strategy for CCS Projects in Scotland: A Review of Research Findings, CCS Project Experiences, Tools, Resources and Best Practices. SCCS Working Paper 2010-08. Accessed from: http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/sccs/SCCTS_WP4_Final_Report.pdf.
19. Huijts N.M.A., Midden C.J.H., Meijnders A.L. Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2780-2789.
20. Hund, G., Greenberg, S., 2010. FutureGen case study. Prepared for CSIRO on Behalf of the Global CCS Institute: International Comparison of Public Outreach Practices Associated with Large Scale CCS Projects.
21. Hund G., Engel-Cox J., Fowler K. A Communication Guide for Sustainable Development: How Interested Parties Become Partners 2004, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
22. International Energy Agency (IEA) Technology Roadmap, Carbon Capture and Storage 2009, OECD/IEA, (accessed 26.12.11). http://www.iea.org/papers/2009/CCS_Roadmap.pdf.
23. Kahan D.M., Jenkins-Smith H., Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 2011, 14:147-174.
24. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., 2010. Global Warming's Six Americas. Yale Project on Climate Change, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/SixAmericasJune2010.pdf.
25. National Research Council (NRC) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
26. Oltra C., Sala R., Solà R., Di Masso M., Rowe G. Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:698-706.
27. Rayner S., Cantor R. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal and technological choice. Risk Analysis 1987, 7:3-9.
28. Rayner S. Disagreeing about risk: the institutional cultures of risk management. Risk Analysis Institutions and Public Policy 1984, Associated Faculty Press, Port Washington, NY. S.G. Hadden (Ed.).
29. Schwartz M., Thompson M. Divided We Stand. Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice 1992, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
30. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236.
31. Ter Mors E., Weenig M.W.H., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Effective communication about complex environmental issues: perceived quality of information about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010, 30:347-357.
32. Ter Mors E., Weenig M., Ellemers N. The influence of (in)congruence of communicator expertise and trustworthiness on acceptance of CCS technologies. International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2006.
33. Terwel B.W., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Risk Analysis 2009, 29:1129-1140.
34. Tuler S., Webler T. How preferences for public participation are linked to perceptions of context, preferences for outcomes and individual characteristics. Environmental Management 2010, 46:254-267.
35. Upham P., Roberts T. Public perceptions of CCS: emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5(5):1359-1367.
36. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2010. Best Practices for Site Screening, Site Selection, and Initial Characterization for Storage of CO2 in Deep Geologic Formations. DOE/NETL-401/090808.
37. Webler T., Tuler S., Krueger R. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 2001, 27:435-450.
38. World Resources Institute (WRI), 2010. CCS and Community Engagement: Guidelines for Community Engagement in Carbon Dioxide Capture, Transport and Storage Projects. WRI Report, Washington, DC.