Scene interpretation for self-aware cognitive robots

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-14-06, Issue , 2014, Pages 89-96

  Ozturk, Melodi Deniz ^a   Ersen, Mustafa ^a   Kapotoglu, Melis ^a   Koc, Cagatay ^a   Sariel Talay, Sanem ^a   Yalcin, Hulya ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY RELATION; COGNITIVE ROBOTS; EXPERIMENTAL LEARNING; INTERPRETATION SYSTEMS; SCENE INTERPRETATION; SPATIAL PREDICATES; SPATIAL RELATIONS; SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION;

ROBOTS;

EID: 84904858443     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aldoma, A.; Marton, Z.-C.; Tombari, F.; Wohlkinger, W.; Potthast, C.; Zeisl, B.; Rusu, R. B.; Gedikli, S.; and Vincze, M. 2012. Tutorial: Point cloud library: Three-dimensional object recognition and 6 DOF pose estimation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 19(3):80-91.
2. Elfring, J.; van den Dries, S.; van de Molengraft, M. J. G.; and Steinbuch, M. 2013. Semantic world modeling using probabilistic multiple hypothesis anchoring. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61(2):95-105.
3. Ersen, M.; Sariel-Talay, S.; and Yalcin, H. 2013. Extracting spatial relations among objects for failure detection. In Proc. of the KI 2013 Workshop on Visual and Spatial Cognition, 13-20.
4. Falomir, Z.; Jiménez-Ruiz, E.; Escrig, M. T.; and Museros, L. 2011. Describing images using qualitative models and description logics. Spatial Cognition and Computation 11(1):45-74.
5. Frank, A. U. 1991. Qualitative spatial reasoning with cardinal directions. In Proceedings of the 7th Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 157-167.
6. Gurǎu, C., and Nüchter, A. 2013. Challenges in using semantic knowledge for 3D object classification. In Proc. of the KI 2013 Workshop on Visual and Spatial Cognition, 29-35.
7. Hawes, N.; Klenk, M.; Lockwood, K.; Horn, G. S.; and Kelleher, J. D. 2012. Towards a cognitive system that can recognize spatial regions based on context. In Proc. of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'12), 200-206.
8. Hinterstoisser, S.; Cagniart, C.; Ilic, S.; Sturm, P. F.; Navab, N.; Fua, P.; and Lepetit, V. 2012. Gradient response maps for real-time detection of textureless objects. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34(5):876-888.
9. Karapinar, S.; Altan, D.; and Sariel-Talay, S. 2012. A robust planning framework for cognitive robots. In Proc. of the AAAI-12 Workshop on Cognitive Robotics, 102-108.
10. Karapinar, S.; Sariel-Talay, S.; Yildiz, P.; and Ersen, M. 2013. Learning guided planning for robust task execution in cognitive robotics. In Proc. of the AAAI-13 Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems, 26-31.
11. Kasper, A.; Jäkel, R.; and Dillmann, R. 2011. Using spatial relations of objects in real world scenes for scene structuring and scene understanding. In Proc. of the 15th IEEE Intl. Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR'11), 421-426.
12. Lowe, D. G. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proc. of the 7th IEEE Intl. Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'99), 1150-1157.
13. Neumann, B., and Möller, R. 2008. On scene interpretation with description logics. Image and Vision Computing (Cognitive Vision Special Issue) 26(1):82-101. (Pubitemid 350051535)
14. Randell, D. A.; Cui, Z.; and Cohn, A. G. 1992. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), 165-176.
15. Sjöö, K.; Aydemir, A.; and Jensfelt, P. 2012. Topological spatial relations for active visual search. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60(9):1093-1107.
16. Sokeh, H. S.; Gould, S.; and Renz, J. 2013. Efficient extraction and representation of spatial information from video data. In Proc. of the 23rd Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'13), 1076-1082.