Assessment for career and citizenship

The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 221-230

  Yorke, Mantz ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904844014     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203892596     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
2. Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an uncertain future. Higher Education Research and Development 23 (3), 247-260.
3. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum. Maidenhead: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.
4. Becker, G.S. (1975). Human capital. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
5. Belbin, R.M. (1981). Management teams: why they succeed or fail. London: Heinemann.
6. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university, 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
7. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman.
8. Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens. preparing America's undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Committee on Higher Education (1963). Higher education [Report of the Committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the chairmanship of Lord Robbins, 1961-63]. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
10. Council of Europe (2005). Message from the Council of Europe to the meeting of ministers of the European Higher Education Area, Bergen, 19-20 May. Atwww.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/Part_org/Council_of_Europe/050425_CoE.pdf (accessed 26 November2007).
11. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
12. Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
13. Eisner, E.W. (1979). The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
14. Eraut, M. (2004). A wider perspective on assessment. Medical Education, 38(8), pp.803-4.
15. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
16. HEQC(1997a). Assessment in higher education and the role of 'graduateness'. London: Higher Education Quality Council.
17. HEQC(1997b). Graduate Standards Program: final report (2 vols.). London: Higher Education Quality Council.
18. Hornby, W. (2003). Assessing using grade-related criteria: A single currency for universities? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 435-54.
19. Hurtado, S., Sax, L.J., Saenz, V., Harper, C.E., Oseguera, L., Curley, J., Lopez, L., Wolf, D. & Arellano, L. (2007). Findings from the 2005 administration of Your First College Year. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
20. Knight, P.T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.
21. Knight, P. (2006). The local practices of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 435-52.
22. Knight, P. (2007a). Fostering and assessing 'wicked' competences. Atwww.open.ac.uk/cetl-workspace/cetlcontent/documents/460d1d1481d0f.pdf (accessed 28 November 2007).
23. Knight, P. (2007b). Grading, classifying and future learning. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 72-86). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
24. Marzano, R.J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
25. Meyers, N.M., Whelan, K.A., Nulty, D., & Ryan, Y. (2004). Enhancing the transition of first year science students - a strategic and systematic approach. Paper presented at the 8th Pacific Rim Conference on the First Year in Higher Education, Monash University, 14-16 July.
26. Milton, O., Pollio, H.R., & Eison, J. (1986). Making sense of college grades. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Noel-Levitz (2007). Second annual national freshman attitudes report. Iowa City, IA: Noel-Levitz.
28. Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students [Vol 2: A third decade of research]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). New York: Academic Press.
30. Reich, R.B. (2002). The future of success. London: Vintage.
31. Rogers, C. (2002). Developing a positive approach to failure. In M. Peelo & T. Wareham (Eds.), Failing students in higher education (pp. 113-123). Buckingham: SRHE and the Open University Press.
32. Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
33. Stephenson, J. (1992). Capability and quality in higher education. In J. Stephenson & S. Weil (Eds.), Quality in learning: a capability approach to higher education (pp. 1-9). London: Kogan Page.
34. Tinto, V. (1997). Classroom as communities: exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education 68 (6), 599-623.
35. Wolf, A. (2002). Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth. London: Penguin.
36. Yorke, M. (2008). Grading student achievement: signals and shortcomings. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
37. Yorke, M., & Knight, P.T. (2006). Embedding employability into the curriculum. York: The Higher Education Academy. Available atwww.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/tla/employability/id460_embedding_employability_into_the_curriculum_338.pdf (accessed 6 January2008).