Neoliberal confluences: The turbulent evolution of stream mitigation banking in the us

Political Power and Social Theory

Volumn 27, Issue , 2014, Pages 59-88

  Lave, Rebecca ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904813337     PISSN: 01988719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0198-871920140000027010     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bernhardt, E., & Palmer, M. A. (2011). River restoration: The fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecological Applications, 21(6), 1926 -1931.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12, 311-356.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and structure of the religious field. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Comparative social research: Religious institutions (pp. 1-44). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1996 a). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of powe r. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1996 b ). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original Edition, Sociological Theory, 1994.)
8. Bourdieu P.,Wacquant L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. J. D., & Farage, S. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1-18.
10. Camic, C. (2011). Bourdieu's cleft sociology of science. Minerva, 49, 275-293.
11. Canaan, J. E., & Shumar, W. (2008). Higher education in the era of globalization and neoliberalism. In J. E. Canaan & W. Shumar (Eds.), Structure and agency in the neoliberal university (pp. 1-30). London: Routledge.
12. Carter, J. (1978). Executive order 12044: Improving government regulations.
13. Carter, J. (1980, June 13). White House Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies.
14. Clinton, W. (1993). Exec utive order 12866: Regulatory planning and review. Washington, DC. Corps (US Army Corps of Engineers), & EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2008). Compensatory mitigation for losses of aquatic resources. Federal Register, 73.
15. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., ? van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260.
16. Cronon, W. (1991). Nature's metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
17. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18. Dempsey, J., & Robertson, M. (2012). Ecosystem services: Tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 758-779.
19. Denisoff, C. (2 006). President's Corner. National Mitigation Banking Association.
20. Doyle, M. W., & Shields, F. D. (2012). Compensatory mitigation for streams under the Clean Water Act: Reassessing science and redirecting policy. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(3), 494-509.
21. Doyle, M. W., Shields, F. D., Boyd, K. F., Skidmore, P. B., & Dominick, D. W. (2007). Channel-forming discharge selection in river restoration design. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(7), 831-837.
22. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1981). Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York, NY: Random House.
23. Ewoldt, D. (2008). President's Corner. National Mitigation Banking Association.
24. Eyal, G. (2013). Spaces between fields. In P. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 158-182). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25. Glubiak, P. G., Nowka, R. H., & Mitsch, W. J. (1986). Federal and state management of Inland Wetlands: Are states ready to assume control? Environmental Management, 10, 145-156.
26. Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes , C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209-1218.
27. Gomez-Baggethun, E., & Ruiz-Perez, M. (2012). Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 35(5), 613-628.
28. Greenwalt, L. (1979). Mitigation in our future. In G. A. Swanson (Ed.), The mitigation symposium (pp. 78-81). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
29. Harman, W., Starr, R., Carter, M., Tweedy, K., Clemmons, M., Suggs, K., & Miller, C. (2012). A function-based framework for stream assessment and restoration projects. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
30. Harvey D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Helliwell, D. R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional studies, 3, 41-49.
32. Hess, D. J. (2011). Electricity transformed: Neoliberalism and local energy in the United States. Antipode, 43(4), 1056-1077.
33. Hilts, P. J. (1991). At heart of debate on Quayle council: Who controls Federal regulations? The New York Times, December 16.
34. Horak, G. C. (1979). The status and success of fish and wildlife mitigation in wes tern water resource projects, 1946-1979. In G. A. Swanson (Ed.), The mitigation symposium (pp. 391-395). Fort Collins, CO: RockyMountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
35. Hough, P., & Robertson, M. M. (2009). Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Where it comes from, what it means. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17, 15-33.
36. Joeres, E. F., & David, M. (1983). Is a viable implementation of TDPs transferable? In E. F. Joeres & M. David (Eds.), Buying a better environment: Cost-effective regulation through permit trading. Land Economics Monograp h No. 6. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Juracek, K. E., & Fitzpatrick, F. A. (2003). Limitations and implications of stream classification. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(3), 659-670.
38. Kenney, A. (2008 a ). New EPA wetland guidelines to boost mitigation banks. Ecosystem Marketplace.
39. Kenney, A. (2008 b). Environmentalists sound off on EPA wetland regs. Ecosystem Marketplace.
40. King, D. M. (1992). Avoiding another taxpayer bailout. National Wetlands Newsletter, 14(1), 11-12.
41. King, R. T. (1966). Wildlife and man. New York Conservationist, 20(6), 8-11.
42. Lave, R. (2012a). Bridging political ecology and STS: A field analysis of the Rosgen Wars. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(2), 366-382.
43. Lave, R. (2012b). Fields and streams: Stream restoration, neoliberalism, and the future of environmental science. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
44. Lave, R. (2012c). Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge. Environment & Society: Advances in Research, 3(1), 19-38.
45. Lave, R., Doyle, M., & Robertson, M. (2010). Privatizing stream restoration in the US. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 677-703.
46. Lave, R., Mirowski, P., & Randalls, S. (2010). Introduction: STS and neoliberal science. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 659-675.
47. Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. National Performance Review. (1993). Improving regulatory systems. REGO2: Encourage more innovative approaches to regulation. Office of the Vice President, Washington, DC.
49. National Performance Review. (1995). Reinventing environmental regulation.
50. Nedeva, M., & Boden, R. (2006). Changing science: The advent of neoliberalism. Prometheus, 24(3), 269-281.
51. NMBA. (2001). NMBA newsletter. National Mitigation Banking Association.
52. Norgaard, R. B. (2010). Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1219-1227.
53. Odum, E. P., & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas as necessary com ponents of man's total environment. Transactions of the thirty seventh North American wildlife and natural resources conference (Vol. 37, pp. 178-189). Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute.
54. OIRA. (1998). The role of economic analysis in regulatory reform. Report to congress on the costs and benefits of Federal regulations. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
55. Palmer, M. A., Ambrose, R. F., & LeRoy Poff, N. (1997). Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 5, 291-300.
56. Reagan, R. (1981). Executive order 12291: Federal Regulation. Washington, DC.
57. Redmond, A. (1992). How successful is mitigation? National Wetlands Newsletter, 14(1), 5-6.
58. Robertson, M. M. (2004). The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum, 35(3), 361-373.
59. Robertson, M. M. (2006). The nature that capital can see: Science, state and market in the commodifi cation of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3), 367-387.
60. Robertson, M. M. (2013a). Jimmy Carter and the archaeology of market environmentalism, Part 1. Retrieved from http://wetlandia.blogspot.com/2013/07/ coase-carter-and-archaeology-of-market.html. Accessed on August 17, 2013.
61. Robertson, M. M. (2013b). Jimmy Carter and the archaeology of market environmentalism, Part 2. Retrieved from htt p://wetlandia.blogspot.com/2013/08/ jimmy-carter-andarchaeology-of-market.html. Accessed on August 17, 2013.
62. Roper, B. B., Buffington, J. M., Archer, E., Moyer, C., & Ward, M. (2008). The role of obse rver variation in determining Rosgen stream types in Northeastern Oregon mountain streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(2), 417-427.
63. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Short, C. (1988). Mitigation banking. Washington, DC: US Fish & Wildlife Service.
65. Sudduth, E., Hassett, B. A., Cada, P., & Bernhardt, E. (2011). Testing the field of dreams hypothesis: Functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 21(6), 1972-1988.
66. US Congress. (1958). Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC 661-666). Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
67. US Regulatory Council. (1980). Innovative techniques in theory and practice. Proceedings of a regulatory council conference, Washington, DC.
68. Violin, C. R., Cada, P., Sudduth, E., Hassett, B. A., Penrose, D. L., & Bernhardt, E. (2011). Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 21(6), 1932- 1949.
69. Weidenbaum, M. (1997). Regulatory process reform from Ford to Clinton. In Regulation. Washington DC: Cato Institute.