Bridging political ecology and STS: A field analysis of the Rosgen Wars

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 366-382

  Lave, Rebecca ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bourdieu; political ecology; Rosgen; science and technology studies; stream restoration

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; PLANNING THEORY; POLITICAL ECONOMY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STREAM; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84857933289     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: 14678306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2011.641884     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Ashmore, P. 1999. What would we do without Rosgen?: Rational regime relations and natural channels. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Natural Systems Design, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada
2. Bavington, D. 2010. Managed annihilation: An unnatural history of the Newfoundland cod collapse., Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
3. Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S.Carr, J. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science, 308: 636-37.
4. Blaikie, P. 1985. The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries, New York: Wiley.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6): 19-47.
6. Bourdieu, P. 1983. The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12: 311-56.
7. Bourdieu, P. 1991. "Genesis and structure of the religious field". In Comparative social research: Religious institutions, Edited by: Calhoun, C. 1-44. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8. Bourdieu, P. 1996a. The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Bourdieu, P. 1996b. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Bourdieu, P. 1998. "Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field". In Practical reason: On the theory of action, Edited by: Bourdieu, P. 35-63. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. J. D. and Farage, S. 1994. Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1): 1-18.
13. Braun, B. 2002. The intemperate rainforest: Nature, culture and power on Canada's west coast, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Braun, B. and Castree, N. 1998. Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium, London and New York: Routledge.
15. Davis, D. K. 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome: Environmental history and French colonial expansion in North Africa, Athens: Ohio University Press.
16. Demeritt, D. 1998. "Science, social constructivism and nature". In Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium, Edited by: Braun, B. and Castree, N. 173-93. London and New York: Routledge.
17. Demeritt, D. 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2): 307-37.
18. Doyle, M. W. and Harbor, J. M. 2000. Discussion of "Evaluation of Rosgen's streambank erosion potential assessment in northeast Oklahoma" by Harmel. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(5): 1191-92.
19. Doyle, M. W., Miller, D. E. and Harbor, J. M. 1999. Should river restoration be based on classification schemes or process models? Insights from the history of geomorphology. Paper presented at the ASCE International Conference on Water Resources Engineering, Seattle, WA
20. Duvall, C. 2011. "Ferricrete, forests, and temporal scale in the production of colonial science in Africa". In Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Edited by: Goldman, M., Nadasy, P. and Turner, M. 113-27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Environmental Law Institute. 2006. Status report on compensatory mitigation in the United States, Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
22. Fairhead, J. and Leach, M. 1996. Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Fairhead, J. and Leach, M. 2003. Science, society and power: Environmental knowledge and policy in West Africa and the Caribbean, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group. 1998. Stream corridor restoration: Principles, processes, and practices
25. Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science, London and New York: Routledge.
26. Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Gillilan, S. 1996. Use and misuse of channel classification schemes. Stream Notes, October:2-3
28. Goldman, M. 2005. Imperial nature: The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P. and Turner, M. 2011. Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Goldman, M. and Turner, M. 2011. "Introduction". In Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Edited by: Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P. and Turner, M. 1-23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Hecht, S. 1985. Environment, development and politics: Capital accumulation and the livestock sector in Eastern Amazonia. World Development, 13(6): 663-84.
32. Jordan, W. R. III. 2000. "Restoration, community, and wilderness". In Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities, Edited by: Gobster, P. H. and Hull, R. B. 21-36. Washington, DC: Island Press.
33. Juracek, K. E. and Fitzpatrick, F. A. 2003. Limitations and implications of stream classification. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(3): 659-70.
34. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: Uses and limitations. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 5: 127-41.
35. Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8: 39-52.
36. Kondolf, G. M. 2007. River restoration in North America: Meandering channels for all?. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, CA
37. Kondolf, G. M., Smeltzer, M. W. and Railsback, S. 2001. Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environmental Management, 28(6): 761-76.
38. Lave, R. 2008. The Rosgen Wars and the shifting construction of scientific expertise. Doctoral dissertation, Geography Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
39. Lave, R. 2009. The controversy over Natural Channel Design: Substantive explanations and potential avenues for resolution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45(6): 1519-32.
40. Lave, R. 2011. "Constructing scientific expertise outside of the academy". In Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Edited by: Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P. and Turner, M. 263-79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Lave, R., Doyle, M. W. and Robertson, M. M. 2010. Privatizing stream restoration in the U.S. Social Studies of Science, 40(5): 677-703.
42. Lave, R., Mirowski, P. and Randalls, S. 2010. Introduction: STS and neoliberal science. Social Studies of Science, 40(5): 659-75.
43. Lave, R., Robertson, M. M. and Doyle, M. W. 2008. Why you should pay attention to stream mitigation banking. Ecological Restoration, 26(4): 287-89.
44. Leach, M. and Mearns, R. 1996. The lie of the land: Challenging received wisdom on the African environment, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
45. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46. Miller, J. R. and Ritter, J. B. 1996. An examination of the Rosgen classification of natural rivers. Catena, 27: 295-99.
47. Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-Mart: Privatizing American science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Neumann, R. P. 1998. Imposing wilderness: Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa, Berkeley: University of California Press.
49. O'Neill, K. M. 2006. Rivers by design: State power and the origins of U.S. flood control, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50. Raffles, H. 2002. In Amazonia: A natural history, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Randalls, S. 2010. Weather profits: Weather derivatives and the commercialization of meteorology. Social Studies of Science, 40(5): 705-30.
52. Robertson, M. M. 2006. The nature that capital can see: Science, state and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3): 367-87.
53. Roper, B. B., Buffington, J. M., Archer, E., Moyer, C. and Ward, M. 2008. The role of observer variation in determining Rosgen stream types in northeastern Oregon mountain streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(2): 417-27.
54. Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 22(3): 169-99.
55. Rosgen, D. L. 1996. Applied river morphology, 2nd ed, Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology.
56. Rosgen, D. L. 2006. The application of stream classification using the fluvial geomorphology approach for natural channel design: The rest of the story. Paper presented at the ASCE Environmental & Water Resources Institute, Omaha, NE
57. Rosgen, D. L. 2007. "The Rosgen geomorphic approach for natural channel design". In Stream Restoration Design. National Engineering Handbook Part 654, LANDCARE, 11-1-11-76. Des Moines, IA: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service.
58. Sayre, N. F. 2002. Ranching, endangered species, and urbanization in the Southwest: Species of capital, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
59. Sayre, N. F. 2008. The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(1): 120-34.
60. Sear, D. A. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4: 169-77.
61. Shields, F. D., Brookes, A. and Haltiner, J. P. 1999. "Geomorphological approaches to incised stream channel restoration in the United States and Europe". In Incised river channels, Edited by: Darby, S. and Simon, A. 371-94. New York: Wiley.
62. Shields, F. D. and Copeland, R. 2006. Empirical and analytical approaches for stream channel design. Paper presented at the Federal Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV
63. Shields, F. D., Copeland, R. W., Klingeman, P. C., Doyle, M. W. and Simon, A. 2009. "Chapter 9. Stream restoration". In Manual 54 update, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
64. Shields, F. D., Copeland, R. W., Klingeman, P. C., Doyle, M. W. and Simon, A. 2009. "Stream restoration". In Manual 54 update
65. Simon, A. 2006. Flow energy, time, and evolution of dynamic fluvial systems: Implications for stabilization and restoration of unstable systems. Paper presented at the 2006 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Omaha, NE
66. Simon, A., Doyle, M. W., Kondolf, G. M., Shields, F. D., Rhoads, B., Grant, G., Fitzpatrick, F. A., Juracek, K. E., McPhillips, M. and MacBroom, J. 2005. How well do the Rosgen classification and associated "Natural Channel Design" methods integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel response?. Paper presented at ASCE EWRI, Anchorage, AK
67. Simon, A., Doyle, M. W., Kondolf, G. M., Shields, F. D., Rhoads, B. and McPhillips, M. 2007. Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated "Natural Channel Design" methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel response. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(5): 1-15.
68. Simon, A. and Langendoen, E. J. 2006. A deterministic bank-stability and toe-erosion model for stream restoration. Paper presented at the Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Omaha, NE
69. Slate, L. O., Shields, F. D., Schwartz, J. S., Carpenter, D. D. and Freeman, G. E. 2007. Engineering design standards and liability for stream channel restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133: 1099-1102.
70. Smith, S. M. and Prestegaard, K. L. 2005. Hydraulic performance of a morphology-based stream channel design. Water Resources Research, 41: W11413
71. Thompson, D. M. and Stull, G. N. 2002. The development and historic use of habitat structures in channel restoration in the United States: The grand experiment in fisheries management. Geographie Physique et Quaternaire, 56(1): 45-60.
72. Walker, J. and Cooper, M. 2011. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2): 143-60.
73. Watts, M. and McCarthy, J. 1997. "Nature as artifice, nature as artefact: Development, environment and modernity in the late twentieth century". In Geographies of economies, Edited by: Lee, R. and Wills, J. 71-86. London: Arnold.
74. Wilshusen, P. R. 2007. Shades of social capital: Elite persistence and the everyday politics of community forestry in southeastern Mexico. Environment and Planning A, 41(2): 389-406.