Application of environmental performance assessment of CHP systems with local and global approaches

Applied Energy

Volumn 130, Issue , 2014, Pages 774-782

  Bianchi, Michele ^a   Branchini, Lisa ^a   De Pascale, Andrea ^a   Peretto, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Avoided Heat Generator; CHP; Energy saving; Environmental pressure; Gas emission; Prime mover

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; GAS EMISSIONS; HEAT GENERATION;

AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURES; HEAT GENERATORS; PRIME MOVERS;

POWER GENERATION;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 84904805657     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Directive 2004/08/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union 21.2.2004. p. 50-60.
2. Angrisani G., Roselli C., Sasso M. Distributed microtrigeneration systems. Progr Energy Combust Sci 2012, 38(4):502-521.
3. Cogeneration and District Heating, International Energy Agency (IEA); 2008.
4. Monitoraggio dello sviluppo degli impianti di generazione distribuita per l'anno 2010 (In Italian), AEEG (National Italian Autority for Electric Energy and Gas); 2011.
5. Kuhn V., Klemeš J., Bulatov I. MicroCHP: overview of selected technologies, products and field test results. Appl Therm Eng 2008, 28(16):2039-2048.
6. Bianchi M., De Pascale A. Bottoming cycles for electric energy generation: parametric investigation of available and innovative solutions for the exploitation of low and medium temperature heat sources. Appl Energy 2011, 88(5):1500-1509.
7. Wakui T., Yokoyama R. Optimal sizing of residential SOFC cogeneration system for power interchange operation in housing complex from energy-saving viewpoint. Energy 2012, 41(1):65-74.
8. Dentice d'Accadia M., Sasso M., Sibilio S., Vanoli L. Micro-combined heat and power in residential and light commercial applications. Appl Therm Eng 2003, 23(10):1247-1259.
9. 2 emissions. Appl Thermal Eng 2005, 25:2653-2676.
10. Bianchi M., De Pascale A., Spina P.R. Guidelines for residential micro-CHP systems design. Appl Energy 2012, 97:673-685.
11. US Federal Regulation, 18 C.F.R., PART 292, e-CFR; 2013.
12. Martens A. The energetic feasibility of CHP compared to separate production of heat and power. Appl Thermal Eng 1998, 18:935-946.
13. Gullí F. Small distributed generation versus centralised supply: a social cost-benefit analysis in the residential and service sectors. Energy Policy 2006, 34:804-832.
14. Canova A., Chicco G., Genon G., Mancarella P. Emission characterization and evaluation of natural gas-fueled cogeneration microturbines and internal combustion engines. Energy Convers Manage 2008, 49:2900-2909.
15. European Commission, IPPC, Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on LCP; May 2005.
16. Hill R., Mortimer N. Environmental implications. Appl Energy 1996, 53:89-117.
17. Meunier F. Co- and tri-generation contribution to climate change control. Appl Therm Eng 2002, 22:703-718.
18. Mancarella P., Chicco G. Global and local emission impact assessment of distributed cogeneration systems with partial-load models. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2096-2106.
19. Mancarella P., Chicco G. Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part II: Analysis techniques and application cases. Energy 2008, 33:418-430.
20. Fumo N., Mago P.J., Chamra L.M. Emission operational strategy for combined cooling, heating, and power systems. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2344-2350.
21. Rosen M.A. Allocating carbon dioxide emissions from cogeneration systems: descriptions of selected output-based methods. J Cleaner Prod 2008, 16:171-177.
22. Rosen M.A. Reductions in energy use and environmental emissions achievable with utility-based cogeneration: simplified illustrations for Ontario. Appl Energy 1998, 61:163-174.
23. Afgan N.H., Carvalho M.G., Hovanov N.V. Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy 2000, 28(9):603-612.
24. Udo de Haes H.A., Heijungs R. Life-cycle assessment for energy analysis and management. Appl Energy 2007, 84(7-8):817-827.
25. Branchini L., De Pascale A., Peretto A. Systematic comparison of ORC configurations by means of comprehensive performance indexes. Appl Therm Eng 2013, 61:129-140.
26. European Commission Eurostat. Environmental pressure indicators for the EU; 2001.
27. Bianchi M., De pascale A. Emission calculation methodologies for CHP plants. Energy Proc 2012, 14:1323-1330.
28. Accounting for CHP in Output-Based Regulations, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Combined Heat and Power Partnership; February 2013. http://www.epa.gov/chp/resources.html.
29. Commission Decision 2007/74/EC, Official Journal of the European Union 6.2.2007. p. 183-8.
30. European Standards EN N. 483; 2000.
31. AEEG, Delib. 296/05, in Italian; 2005.
32. Lombardia Region, Delib. VII/6501 19/10/01, regional deliberation, in Italian.
33. ENEL, Environmental Report; 2006.
34. Campana F., Bianchi M., Branchini L., De Pascale A., Peretto A., Baresi M., et al. ORC waste heat recovery in european energy intensive industries: energy and GHG savings. Energy Convers Manage December 2013, 76:244-252. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.041.