Allocating carbon dioxide emissions from cogeneration systems: descriptions of selected output-based methods

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-177

  Rosen, Marc A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide emissions; Cogeneration; Emissions allocation; Exergy

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; COGENERATION PLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXERGY; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

EMISSIONS ALLOCATION; EXERGY-BASED METHOD; OUTPUT-BASED METHODS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 34948893391     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Strickland C, Nyober J. Cogeneration potential in Canada: phase 2. Report for Natural Resources Canada, by MK Jaccard and Associates, 2002.
2. Strickland C, Nyober J. A review of existing cogeneration facilities in Canada. Report by Canadian Industrial Energy End-Use Data and Analysis Center, Simon Fraser University, 2002.
3. Phylipsen G.J.M., Blok K., and Worrell E. Handbook on international comparisons of energy efficiency in the manufacturing industry (1998), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
4. Klein M. The need for standards to promote low emission, high efficiency gas turbine facilities. In: Paper 99-GT-405 presented at the ASME international gas turbine and aeroengine congress and exhibition. Indianapolis, IN; 1999. p. 1-10.
5. Klein M. Full fuel cycle emissions estimations. In: Paper 99-IAGT-402 presented at the 13th symposium on industrial applications of gas turbines. Banff, Alberta; 1999. p. 1-22.
6. Klein M., High efficiency combined heat and power facilities: benefits and barriers. In: Proceedings of the Canadian technology development conference. Toronto; 2001. p. 1-20.
7. Klein M. Cogeneration and district energy in Canada. Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production 2 (2001) 2
8. FVB/Eltec. Potential heat production from existing and future electric generating plants. Report No. 9102-G-806 for Canadian Electrical Association, 1993.
9. MacLaren Engineers Inc. Cogeneration sourcebook. Report for Ontario Ministry of Energy, Toronto, 1988.
10. Henneforth J.C., and Todd D.M. Cogeneration on a large scale. Mechanical Engineering 110 August (1988) 51-53
11. Acres International Limited. Cogeneration potential in Ontario and barriers to its development. Report for Ontario Ministry of Energy, Toronto, 1987.
12. Horlock J.H. Some practical CHP schemes. Cogeneration: combined heat and power (CHP) (1987), Pergamon, Oxford, UK [chapter 5]. p. 158-74
13. Rosen M.A. Assessment of various scenarios for utility-based cogeneration in Ontario. Energy-The International Journal 19 (1994) 1143-1149
14. Rosen M.A. Reductions in energy use and environmental emissions achievable with utility-based cogeneration: simplified illustrations for Ontario. Applied Energy 61 (1998) 163-174
15. Rosen M.A., Le M.N., and Dimitriu J. Efficiency improvement for large energy systems through utility-based cogeneration and district energy: investigation for Ontario, Canada. World Energy System: An International Journal 1 (1997) 56-63
16. Hart D.R., and Rosen M.A. Environmental and health benefits of utility-based cogeneration in Ontario, Canada. Energy and Environment 5 (1994) 363-378
17. Kotas T.J. The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Reprint ed. (1995), Krieger, Malabar, FL
18. Moran M.J. Availability analysis: a guide to efficient energy use. Revised ed. (1989), ASME, New York
19. Moran M.J., and Sciubba E. Exergy analysis: principles and practice. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 116 (1994) 285-290
20. Moran M.J., and Shapiro H.N. Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics. 4th ed. (2000), Wiley, New York
21. Szargut J., Morris D.R., and Steward F.R. Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes (1988), Hemisphere, New York
22. Rosen M.A. Second law analysis: approaches and implications. International Journal of Energy Research 23 (1999) 415-429
23. Sciubba E. Exergy as a direct measure of environmental impact. In: Aceves SM, et al. editors. Proceedings of the ASME advanced energy systems division, AES-vol. 39; 1999. p. 573-81.
24. Rosen M.A., and Dincer I. On exergy and environmental impact. International Journal of Energy Research 21 (1997) 643-654
25. Rosen M.A., and Dincer I. Exergy analysis of waste emissions. International Journal of Energy Research 23 (1999) 1153-1163
26. Rosen M.A., and Dincer I. Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development. Exergy, An International Journal 1 (2001) 3-13
27. Gunnewiek L.H., and Rosen M.A. Relation between the exergy of waste emissions and measures of environmental impact. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 10 (1998) 261-272
28. Daniel JJ, Rosen MA. Exergy-based environmental assessment of life cycle emissions for various automobiles and fuels. In: Proceedings of CSME Forum 2002. Kingston, Ontario, Sec. 20, Paper 4; 2002. p. 1-14.
29. Cownden R., Nahon M., and Rosen M.A. Exergy analysis of a fuel cell power system for transportation applications. Exergy, An International Journal 1 (2001) 112-121
30. Rosen M.A., and Dincer I. Energy and exergy analyses of thermal energy storage systems. Thermal energy storage systems and applications (2002), Wiley, London [chapter 10]. p. 411-510
31. Rosen M.A., and Horazak D.A. Energy and exergy analyses of PFBC power plants. In: Alvarez Cuenca M., and Anthony E.J. (Eds). Pressurized fluidized bed combustion (1995), Chapman and Hall, London, UK 419-448
32. Rosen M.A. Comparison based on energy and exergy analyses of the potential cogeneration efficiencies for fuel cells and other electricity generation devices. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 15 (1990) 267-274