A novel computerized surgeon-machine interface for robot-assisted laser phonomicrosurgery

Laryngoscope

Volumn 124, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1887-1894

  Mattos, Leonardo S ^a   Deshpande, Nikhil ^a   Barresi, Giacinto ^a   Guastini, Luca ^b   Peretti, Giorgio ^b  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

microlaryngeal surgery; Robotics; surgeon interface

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE HAND COORDINATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER SURGERY; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; MICROMANIPULATOR; MICROSCOPE; MICROSURGERY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; ROBOTICS;

CO2 LASER; MICROLARYNGEAL SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON INTERFACE;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LARYNX; LASER THERAPY; MICROSURGERY; PILOT PROJECTS; ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84904764167     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24566     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Rosen J, Solazzo M, Hannaford B, Sinanan MN,. Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7: 49-61.
2. Solares CA, Strome M,. Transoral robot-assisted CO2 laser supraglottic laryngectomy: experimental and clinical data. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 817-820.
3. Dagnino G, Mattos LS, Caldwell DG,. New Software Tools for Enhanced Precision in Robot-Assisted Laser Phonomicrosurgery. In Proceedings of 34th International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2012:2804-2807, IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA.
4. Remacle M, Hassan F, Cohen D, Lawson G, Delos M,. New computer-guided scanner for improving CO2 laser-assisted microincision. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262: 113-119.
5. Remacle M, Lawson G, Nollevaux M, Delos M,. Current state of scanning micromanipulator applications with the carbon dioxide laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008; 117: 239-244.
6. Wong Y-T, Finley CC, Giallo JF Jr, Buckmire RA,. Novel CO2 laser robotic controller outperforms experienced laser operators in tasks of accuracy and performance repeatability. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 1738-1742.
7. Mattos LS, Dagnino G, Becattini G, Dellepiane M, Caldwell DG,. A virtual scalpel system for computer-assisted laser microsurgery. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2011:1359-1365, IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA.
8. Mattos LS, Dellepiane M, Caldwell DG,. Next generation micromanipulator for computer-assisted laser phonomicrosurgery. In: Proceedings of 33rd International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2011:4555-4559, IEEE, Boston, MA, USA.
9. Barresi G, Deshpande N, Mattos LS, et al. Comparative usability and performance evaluation of surgeon interfaces in laser phonomicrosurgery. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2013: 3610-3615, IEEE, Tokyo, Japan.
10. Brooke J., SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In:, Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, eds. Usability Evaluation in Industry. 1996: 189-194, Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
11. Deshpande N, Mattos LS, Barresi G, et al. Imaging based metrics for performance assessment in laser phonomicrosurgery. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2013: 4835-4841, IEEE, Karlsruhe, Germany.
12. Welch BL,. The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 1947; 34: 28-35.