Impact of batch variability on physicochemical properties of manufactured TiO2 and SiO2 nanopowders

Powder Technology

Volumn 267, Issue , 2014, Pages 39-53

  Motzkus, C ^a   Gaie Levrel, F ^a   Ausset, P ^b   Maille M ^b   Baccile, N ^c,d,e   Vaslin Reimann, S ^a   Idrac, J ^a   Oster, D ^a   Fischer, N ^a   Mace T ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE NATIONAL DE MÉTROLOGIE ET D ESSAIS LNE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE INTERUNIVERSITAIRE DES SYSTÈMES ATMOSPHÉRIQUES   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Batch variability; Manufactured nanopowders; Metrology; Nanoparticles; Physico chemical characterization

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; MANUFACTURE; MEASUREMENTS; NANOPARTICLES; OXIDES; PARTICLE SIZE; SILICA; SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION;

AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER; BATCH VARIABILITY; BRUNAUER-EMMETT-TELLER METHOD; NANO POWDERS; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION; SCANNING MOBILITY PARTICLE SIZER; SILICON DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLES;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

METAL NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BATCH PROCESS; BRUNAUER EMMETT TELLER METHOD; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DESORPTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NANOANALYSIS; NANOFABRICATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NITROGEN CONCENTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POWDER; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING MOBILITY PARTICLE SIZER; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 84904747206     PISSN: 00325910     EISSN: 1873328X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.055     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Oberdörster G. Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2001, 74:1-8.
2. Maynard A.D., Kuempel E.D. Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005, 7:587-614.
3. Oberdörster G., Maynard A.D., Donaldson K., Castranova V., Fritzpatrick J., Ausman K., Carter J., Karn B., Kreyling W., Lai D., Olin S., Monteiro-Riviere N., Warheit D., Yang H. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2005, 2:1-35.
4. Witschger O., Fabriès J.F. Particules ultra-fines et santé au travail. 1 - Caractérisation des effets potentiels sur la santé. Hyg. Sécur. Trav. 2005, 199:21-35.
5. Nel A., Xia T., Madler L., Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622-627.
6. Tsuji J.S., Maynard A.D., Howard P.C., James J.T., Lam C.W., Warheit D.B., Santamaria A.B. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part IV: risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 89:42-50.
7. Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Environnement et du Travail AFSSET Les nanomatériaux, effets sur la santé de l'homme et de l'environnement 2006, Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'environnement et du Travail.
8. Hervé-Bazin B. Nanoparticles: A Major Challenge for Occupational Health? 2007, Les Ulis EDP Sciences. 1st ed.
9. Lahmani M., Marano F., Houdy P. Les nanosciences. Tome 4: Nanotoxicologie et nanoéthique 2010, 2010. Éditions Belin, Paris.
10. Hamelmann F., Schmidt E. Methods for estimating the dustiness of industrial powders - a review. KONA 2003, 21:7-18.
11. ISO/TR 13014 Nanotechnologies - Guidance on Physico-chemical Characterization of Engineered Nanoscale Materials for Toxicologic Assessment 2012.
12. Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail ANSES report Développement d'un outil de gestion graduée des risques spécifique au cas des nanomatériaux (control banding) http://www.anses.fr/sites/default/files/documents/AP2008sa0407.pdf.
13. Gaffet E., Block D., Gouget B., Herlin-Boime N., Honnert B., Lombard A., Riediker M., Tardif F. Nanomaterials and occupational safety report, AFSSET report http://www.afssa.fr/ET/DocumentsET/08_07_ED_nanomateriaux_2_rapport_EV_opti.pdf.
14. European Commission report Types and uses of nanomaterials, including safety aspects http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/second_regulatory_review_on_nanomaterials_-_staff_working_paper_accompanying_com(2012)_572.pdf.
15. Laurent S., Forge D., Port M., Roch A., Robic C., Vander Elst L., Muller R.N. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:2064-2110.
16. Maynard A.D., Pui D.Y.H. Nanotechnology and occupational health: new technologies - new challenges. J. Nanopart. Res. 2007, 9:1-3.
17. ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results - Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method 1994.
18. Nanogenotox project Facilitating the safety evaluation of manufactured nanomaterials by characterising their potential genotoxic hazard http://www.nanogenotox.eu/.
19. Song N.W., Park K.M., Lee I.-H., Huh H. Uncertainty estimation of nanoparticle size distribution from a finite number of data obtained by microscopic analysis. Metrologia 2009, 46:480-488.
20. ISO 9277, JIS Z 8830 Determination of the Specific Surface Area of Powders (Solids) by Gas Adsorption Method 2010.
21. ISO TS 12025 Nanomaterials - Quantification of Nano-object Release From Powders by Generation of Aerosols 2012.
22. Hinds W. Aerosol Technology - Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, Wiley-interscience 1999, 2nd edition.
23. Sem G.J. Design and performance characteristics of three continuous-flow condensation particle counters: a summary. Atmos. Res. 2002, 62:267-294.
24. 2. Rev. Fr. Métrol. 2012, 2012-1:31-37.
25. 2 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 429(1):012012.
26. 2 nanoparticles with on-line and off-line measurement techniques: an interlaboratory comparison study. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15:1919-1955.
27. ISO 15900 Determination of Particle Size Distribution-differential Electrical Mobility Analysis for Aerosol Particles 2009.
28. De Temmerman P.-J., Mast J., Guiot C., Spalla O., Rousset D., Shivachev B., Trassov M. Transmission electron microscopic characterization of NANOGENOTOX nanomaterials and comparison with and atomic force microscopy - final report, NANOGENOTOX joint action (nanomaterials-final report, http://nanogenotox.eu/files/PDF/Deliverables/d4.2_tem_characterisation.pdf, 2012). http://nanogenotox.eu/files/PDF/Deliverables/d4.2_tem_characterisation.pdf.
29. F. Rouquerol, J. Rouquerol, K. Sing, Adsorption by Porous solids, Principles, Methodology and Applications, chapter 10, Eds., Academic Press Inc., London, 1999.