Diagnostic performance of dedicated positron emission mammography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in women with suspicious breast lesions: A meta-analysis

Clinical Breast Cancer

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 241-248

  Caldarella, Carmelo ^a   Treglia, Giorgio ^b   Giordano, Alessandro ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy of diagnostic studies; Breast malignancy; PEM; Sensitivity and specificity; Statistical pooled evaluation

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84904706478     PISSN: 15268209     EISSN: 19380666     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. Jemal, F. Bray, and M.M. Center et al. Global cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 61 2011 69 90
2. M. Kalager, T. Haldorsen, and M. Bretthauer et al. Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study Breast Cancer Res 11 2009 R44
3. A.I. Mushlin, R.W. Kouides, and D.E. Shapiro Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis Am J Prev Med 14 1998 143 153 (Pubitemid 28360950)
4. S. Njor, L. Nyström, and S. Moss et al. Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies J Med Screen 19 suppl 1 2012 33 41
5. L. Tafra, R. Fine, and P. Whitworth et al. Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors Am J Surg 192 2006 462 470 (Pubitemid 44344197)
6. F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, and A. Roselli et al. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound Invest Radiol 44 2009 412 421
7. J.Y. Kim, N. Cho, and H.R. Koo et al. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer Radiology 267 2013 57 66
8. X.C. Fan, T. Nemoto, and K. Blatto et al. Impact of presurgical breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical planning - a retrospective analysis from a private radiology group Breast J 19 2013 134 141
9. M. Dietzel, P.A. Baltzer, and T. Vag et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions Rofo 183 2011 126 135
10. L.C. Kropcho, S.T. Steen, and A.P. Chung et al. Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ Breast J 18 2012 151 156
11. S.H. Heywang-Köbrunner, P. Viehweg, and A. Heinig et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions Eur J Radiol 24 1997 94 108 (Pubitemid 27165349)
12. N. Avril, and L.P. Adler F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging for primary breast cancer and loco-regional staging Radiol Clin North Am 45 2007 645 657 (Pubitemid 47238389)
13. V. Kalles, G.C. Zografos, and X. Provatopoulou et al. The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis Breast Cancer 20 2013 123 130
14. P.F. Whiting, M.E. Weswood, and A.W. Rutjes et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies BMC Med Res Methodol 6 2006 9
15. J. Zamora, V. Abraira, and A. Muriel et al. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data BMC Med Res Methodol 6 2006 31
16. K. Murthy, M. Aznar, and C.J. Thompson et al. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG J Nucl Med 41 2000 1851 1858
17. E.A. Levine, R.I. Freimanis, and N.D. Perrier et al. Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results Ann Surg Oncol 10 2003 86 91
18. E.L. Rosen, T.G. Turkington, and M.S. Soo et al. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience Radiology 234 2005 527 534 (Pubitemid 40139925)
19. L. Tafra, Z. Cheng, and J. Uddo et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer Am J Surg 190 2005 628 632 (Pubitemid 41306092)
20. W.A. Berg, I.N. Weinberg, and D. Narayanan et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer Breast J 12 2006 309 323 (Pubitemid 43989975)
21. W.A. Berg, K.S. Madsen, and K. Schilling et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast Radiology 258 2011 59 72
22. K. Schilling, D. Narayanan, and J.E. Kalinyak et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38 2011 23 36
23. J.S. Eo, I.K. Chun, and J.C. Paeng et al. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size Breast 21 2012 66 71
24. J.R. Halladay, B.C. Yankaskas, and J.M. Bowling et al. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 782 785
25. M.L. Brown, F. Houn, and E.A. Sickles et al. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 1995 1373 1377
26. V.P. Jackson, R.E. Hendrick, and S.A. Feig et al. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast Radiology 188 1993 297 301 (Pubitemid 23216242)
27. T. Uematsu, M. Kasami, and J. Watanabe Should breast MRI be performed with adjustment for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle? Correlation between mammographic density, age, and background enhancement on breast MRI without adjusting for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle Eur J Radiol 81 2012 1539 1542
28. T. Uematsu, M. Kasami, and J. Watanabe Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21 2011 2261 2267
29. H. Nomori, K. Watanabe, and T. Ohtsuka et al. The size of metastatic foci and lymph nodes yielding false-negative and false-positive lymph node staging with positron emission tomography in patients with lung cancer J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127 2004 1087 1092 (Pubitemid 38451942)
30. M. Heinisch, H.J. Gallowitsch, and P. Mikosch et al. Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions Breast 12 2003 17 22 (Pubitemid 36395482)