Home-based family intervention increases knowledge, communication and living donation rates: A randomized controlled trial

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1862-1869

  Ismail, S Y ^a   Luchtenburg, A E ^a   Timman, R ^a   Zuidema, W C ^a   Boonstra, C ^b   Weimar, W ^a   Busschbach, J J V ^a,b   Massey, E K ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Netherlands Institute for Personality Disorders De Viersprong   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Counseling; ethnicity; family communication; living kidney donation; patient support program

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; END STAGE RENAL DISEASE; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; KNOWLEDGE; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL NETWORK; AGED; CULTURAL FACTOR; INTERVENTION STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COMMUNICATION; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904608012     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12751     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mahillo B, Carmona M, Alvarez M, White S, Noel L, Matesanz R., 2009 Global data in organ donation and transplantation: Activities, laws, and organization. Transplantation 2011; 92: 1069-1074.
2. Udayaraj U, Ben-Shlomo Y, Roderick P, et al. Social deprivation, ethnicity, and access to the deceased donor kidney transplant waiting list in England and Wales. Transplantation 2010; 90: 279-285.
3. Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, et al. Measuring and explaining racial and ethnic differences in willingness to donate live kidneys in the United States. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: 673-683.
4. Roodnat JI, van de Wetering J, Zuidema W, et al. Ethnically diverse populations and their participation in living kidney donation programs. Transplantation 2010; 89: 1263-1269.
5. Roodnat JI, Laging M, Massey EK, et al. Accumulation of unfavorable clinical and socioeconomic factors precludes living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 93: 518-523.
6. Udayaraj U, Ben-Shlomo Y, Roderick P, et al. Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2012; 93: 610-616.
7. Joshi S, Gaynor JJ, Bayers S, et al. Disparities among Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites in time from starting dialysis to kidney transplant waitlisting. Transplantation 2013; 95: 309-318.
8. Kucirka LM, Grams ME, Balkara KS, Jaar BG, Segev DL., Disparities in provision of transplant information affect access to kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 351-357.
9. Ismail SY, Claassens L, Luchtenburg AE, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: A model for breaking the hurdles. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90: 118-124.
10. Garonzik-Wang JM, Berger JC, Ros RL, et al. Live donor champion: Finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient. Transplantation 2012; 93: 1147-1150.
11. Taylor LA, Bahreman N, Hayat MJ, Hoey F, Rajasekaran G, Segev DL., Living kidney donors and their family caregivers: Developing an evidence-based educational and social support website. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 119-128.
12. Ismail SY, Luchtenburg AE, Kal-van Gestel JA, et al. Modifiable factors in access to living-donor kidney transplantation among diverse populations. Transplantation 2013, 96: 586-590.
13. Danovitch GM, Cohen DJ, Weir MR, et al. Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States 1994-2003. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 904-915.
14. Waterman AD, Rodrigue JR, Purnell TS, Ladin K, Boulware LE., Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in live donor kidney transplantation: Priorities for research and intervention. Semin Nephrol 2010; 30: 90-98.
15. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Lin JK, Kaplan B, Howard RJ., Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: A randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 394-401.
16. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Kaplan B, Howard RJ., A randomized trial of a home-based educational approach to increase live donor kidney transplantation: Effects in blacks and whites. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 663-670.
17. Rodrigue JR, Schold JD, Mandelbrot DA., The decline in living kidney donation in the United States: Random variation or cause for concern ? Transplantation 2013; 96: 767-773.
18. Ismail SY, Luchtenburg AE, Boonstra AC, et al. Multisystemic engagement & nephrology based educational intervention: A randomized controlled trial protocol on the Kidney Team at Home-Study. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13: 62-70.
19. Henggeler SW., Delinquency and adolescent psychopathology: A family-ecological systems approach. Littleton, MA: Wright-PSG, 1982.
20. De Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P., Self-efficacy the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 273-282.
21. Ismail SY, Timmerman L, Timman R, et al. A psychometric analysis of the Rotterdam Renal Replacement Knowledge-Test (R3K-T) using item response theory. Transpl Int 2013; 26: 1164-1172.
22. Moors G., Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement. Qual Quant 2008; 42: 779-794.
23. Little RJA, Rubin DB., Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
24. Hox J., Multilevel analysis-Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.
25. Cohen J., A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159.
26. Lee JW, Jones PS, Mineyama Y, Zhang XE., Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health 2002; 25: 295-306.
27. Lunsford SL, Simpson KS, Chavin KD, et al. Racial differences in coping with the need for kidney transplantation and willingness to ask for live organ donation. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47: 324-331.
28. Reese PP, Shea JA, Bloom RD, et al. Predictors of having a potential live donor: A prospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 2792-2799.
29. Kranenburg LW, Zuidema WC, Weimar W, et al. Psychological barriers for living kidney donation: How to inform the potential donors ? Transplantation 2007; 84: 965-971.
30. Dy SM, Purnell TS., Key concepts relevant to quality of complex and shared decision-making in health care: A literature review. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 582-587.
31. Horvat LD, Shariff SZ, Garg AX, Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research Network. Global trends in the rates of living kidney donation. Kidney Int 2009; 75: 1088-1098.
32. Roodnat JI, Kal-van Gestel JA, Zuidema W, et al. Successful expansion of the living donor pool by alternative living donation programs. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 2150-2156.
33. Dutch Transplant Foundation. Leiden: Nederlandse Transplantatie Stichting, 2013. Available at: http://www.transplantatiestichting.nl/webshop/ data. Accessed November 1, 2013.
34. Massey EK, Hilhorst MT, Nette RW, et al. Justification for a home-based education programme for kidney patients and their social network prior to initiation of renal replacement therapy. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 677-681.
35. Hilhorst MT, Kranenburg LW, Busschbach JJ., Should health care professionals encourage living kidney donation ? Med Health Care Philos 2007; 10: 81-90.