Modifiable factors in access to living-donor kidney transplantation among diverse populations

Transplantation

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 586-590

  Ismail, Sohal Y ^a   Luchtenburg, Annemarie E ^a   Kal V Gestel, Judith A ^a   Zuidema, Willij C ^a   Weimar, Willem ^a   Busschbach, Jan J V ^a   Massey, Emma K ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Counseling.; Ethnicity; Family communication; Living kidney donation; Patient support program

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; KNOWLEDGE; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMMUNICATION; COUNSELING; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84884816381     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829b754c     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dutch Transplant Foundation. Leiden: Nederlandse Transplantatie Stichting, 2011. http://www.transplantatiestichting.nl.
2. Roodnat JI, van de Wetering J, Zuidema W, et al. Ethnically diverse populations and their participation in living kidney donation programs. Transplantation 2010; 89: 1263.
3. Roodnat JI, Laging M, Massey EK, et al. Accumulation of unfavorable clinical and socioeconomic factors precludes living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 93: 518.
4. Udayaraj U, Ben-Shlomo Y, Roderick P, et al. Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2012; 93: 610.
5. Kucirka LM, Grams ME, Balkara KS, et al. Disparities in provision of transplant information affect access to kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 351.
6. Ismail SY, Claassens L, Luchtenburg AE, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: A model for breaking the hurdles. Patient Educ Counsel 2013; 90: 118.
7. Garonzik-Wang JM, Berger JC, Ros RL, et al. Live donor champion: finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient. Transplantation 2012; 93: 1147.
8. Taylor LA, Bahreman N, Hayat MJ, et al. Living kidney donors and their family caregivers: developing an evidence-based educational and social support website. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 119.
9. De Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P. Self-efficacy the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 273.
10. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179.
11. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
12. Lee JW, Jones PS, Mineyama Y, et al. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health 2002; 25: 295.
13. Lunsford SL, Simpson KS, Chavin KD, et al. Racial differences in coping with the need for kidney transplantation and willingness to ask for live organ donation. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47: 324.
14. Reese PP, Shea JA, Bloom RD, et al. Predictors of having a potential live donor: a prospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 2792.
15. Ismail SY, Massey EK, Luchtenburg AE, et al. Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients. Med Health Care Philos 2012; 15: 221.
16. Yosef AR. Health beliefs, practice, and priorities for health care of Arab Muslims in the United States. J Transcult Nurs 2008; 19: 284.
17. Pradel FG, Suwannaprom P, Mullins CD, et al. Short-term impact of an educational program promoting live donor kidney transplantation in dialysis centers. Prog Transplant 2008; 18: 263.
18. Kranenburg LW, Richards M, Zuidema WC, et al. Avoiding the issue: patients? (non)communication with potential living kidney donors. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 39.
19. Barnieh L, McLaughlin K, Manns BJ, et al. Evaluation of an education intervention to increase the pursuit of living kidney donation: a randomized controlled trial. Prog Transplant 2011; 21: 36.
20. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Kaplan B, et al. A randomized trial of a homebased educational approach to increase live donor kidney transplantation: effects in blacks and whites. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 663.
21. Ephraim PL, Powe NR, Rabb H, et al. The providing resources to enhance African American patients? readiness to make decisions about kidney disease (PREPARED) study: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13: 135.
22. Ismail SY, Luchtenburg AE, Boonstra AC, et al. Multisystemic engagement & nephrology based educational intervention: a randomized controlled trial protocol on the kidney team at home-study. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13: 62.
23. Ismail SY, Massey EK, Luchtenburg AE, et al. Development of the Rotterdam Renal Knowledge-Test (R3K-T), 2011. Available from: http://repub.eur.nl/res/ pub/23968/Manuscript-Development%20of-R3K-T.pdf.
24. Moors G. Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement. Qual Quant 2008; 42: 779.
25. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2011). http://www.CBS.nl.
26. Kleinbum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, eds. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 1998.
27. Hosmer D, Lemmeshow S, eds. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.