Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 779-794

  Moors, Guy ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Latent class factor analysis; Number of response categories; Response style; Survey research

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949092790     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. D.F. Alwin 1992 Information transmission in the survey interview: number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement Sociol. Methodo. 22 83 118
2. G.F. Bishop 1987 Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions The Public Opin. Q. 51 220 232
3. N.H. Berkowitz G.H. Wolkon 1964 A forced-choice form of the F-scale free of acquiescent response set Sociometry 24 54 56
4. J.B. Billiet M.J. McClendon 2000 Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items Struct. Equation Model. 7 608 628
5. G.W. Cheung R.B. Rensvold 2000 Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 31 187 212
6. A. Couch K. Keniston 1960 Yeasayers and Naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 60 151 74
7. P.E. Ferrando L. Condon E. Chico 2004 The convergent validity of acquiescence: an empirical study relating balanced scales and separate acquiescence scales Pers. Individ. Dif. 37 1331 1340
8. L.A. Goodman 1974 The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable. Part I-a modified latent structure approach Am. J. Sociol. 79 1179 1259
9. Hagenaars J.A. (1990) Categorical Longitudinal Data-Loglinear Analysis of Panel, Trend and Cohort Data. Newbury Park, Sage
10. Heinen T. (1996) Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
11. J.R. Hurley 1998 Timidity as a response style to psychological questionnaires J. Psychol. 132 201 210
12. Inglehart R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton
13. D.N. Jackson S.J. Messick 1965 Acquiescence: the nonvanishing variance component Am. Psychol. 20 498
14. G. Katlon J. Roberts D. Holt 1980 The effects of offering a middle response option with opinion questions Statistician. 29 65 78
15. J. Magidson J.K. Vermunt 2001 Latent class factor and cluster models, bi-plots, and related graphical displays Sociol. Methodo. 31 223 264
16. Mellenbergh G.J. (2001) Outline of a faceted theory of item response data. In: Boomsma A., van Duijn M.A.J., Snijders T.A.B. (eds) Essays on Item Response Theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 415-432
17. G. Moors 2003 Diagnosing response style behavior by means of a latent-class factor approach. Socio- demographic correlates of gender role attitudes and perceptions of ethnic discrimination reexamined Qual. Quant. 37 277 302
18. G. Moors 2004 Facts and artifacts in the comparison of attitudes among ethnic minorities. A multigroup latent class structure model with adjustment for response style behavior Eur. Sociol. Rev. 20 303 320
19. Nunnally J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York
20. Presser, S., Schuman, H.: The Measurement of a Middle Position in Attitude Surveys. Public. Opin. Q. 44, 70-85
21. L.G. Rorer 1965 The great response-style myth Psychol. Bull. 63 129 156
22. W.E. Saris A. Satorra G. Coenders 2004 A new approach to evaluating the quality of measurement instruments: the split-ballot MTMM design Sociol. Methodol. 34 311 347
23. Shuman H., Presser S. (2004) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. Academic, New Yorkx
24. B. Toner 1987 The impact of agreement bias on the ranking of questionnaire response J. Soc. Psychol. 127 221 222
25. van der Veld, W.M., Saris, W.E.: A unified model for the survey response process. Estimating the stability and crystallization of public opinion. In: Paper Presented at the European Association for Survey Research, Barcelona, July 18-21 (2005)
26. Vermunt J.K. (1997) Log-linear Models for Event Histories. Sage Publications, Thousand Oakes, CA
27. M. Viswanathan S. Sudman M. Johnson 2004 Maximum versus meaningful discrimiation in scale response: implications for validity of measurement of consumer perceptions about products J. Bus. Res. 57 108 124