Non-radiological method for three-dimensional implant position evaluation using an intraoral scan method

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1091-1093

  von See, Constantin ^a   Wagner, Maximilian E H ^a   Schumann, Paul ^a   Lindhorst, Daniel ^a   Gellrich, Nils Claudius ^a   Stoetzer, Marcus ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Implant position; Non radiological determination; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MANDIBLE; PIG; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SWINE;

EID: 84904579209     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12214     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Al-Ekrish, A.A. & Ekram, M. (2011) A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 40: 67-75.
2. Kühl, S., Zürcher, S., Mahid, T., Müller-Gerbl, M., Filippi, A. & Cattin, P. (2013) Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery. Clinical Oral Implants Research 24: 763-769.
3. Neugebauer, J., Stachulla, G., Ritter, L., Dreiseidler, T., Mischkowski, R.A., Keeve, E. & Zöller, J.E. (2010) Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert Review of Medical Devices 7: 113-129.
4. Nickenig, H.J. & Eitner, S. (2010) An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates-a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I). Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery: Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 38: 436-440.
5. Ortorp, A., Jemt, T. & Bäck, T. (2005) Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 7: 43-50.
6. Stimmelmayr, M., Guth, J.F., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D. & Beuer, F. (2012) Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Investigations 16: 851-856.